11.07.2015 Views

Barts Health Equality and Human Rights Impact Assessment Report

Barts Health Equality and Human Rights Impact Assessment Report

Barts Health Equality and Human Rights Impact Assessment Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Barts</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Equality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Report</strong>EthnicityLooking at conflated in- <strong>and</strong> outpatient data for all three Trusts, it appears that people fromAfrican <strong>and</strong> Caribbean are much more likely to say they are not always as involved indiscussions about their treatment as they would like to be. 67.42% of Caribbean people saidthis was the case, compared to 61.05% of African people <strong>and</strong> 42.30% of White Britishpeople. This pattern is discernible within individual Trusts, <strong>and</strong> does not appear to beconcentrated in any one organisation or type of care.When looking at groups who categorically state they were not satisfactorily involved indiscussions about their treatment, people from an African background still featureprominently (20.00%). Interestingly, however, the next two most disadvantaged groups areWhite Other (18.26%) <strong>and</strong> White Irish (18.18%). See figure 3.4.1a below.Figure 3.4.1a: % of people who were as involved in decisions about their treatment <strong>and</strong> care as theywould like to be by ethnicity (2010/11) (merged total for all Trusts)149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!