28.11.2012 Views

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 EXACT SOLUTIONS AND SCALAR FIELDS IN GRAVITY<br />

with a compact boundary are the Maclaur<strong>in</strong> ellipsoids <strong>in</strong> the stationary<br />

axisymmetric case, <strong>and</strong> the Jacobi, De<strong>de</strong>k<strong>in</strong>d, <strong>and</strong> Riemann ellipsoids<br />

<strong>in</strong> the (<strong>in</strong> general) non-axisymmetric case [1, 2]. It is remarkable that<br />

the Jacobi ellipsoids, triaxial figures rotat<strong>in</strong>g around a pr<strong>in</strong>cipal axis<br />

as a whole (rigidly) with constant angular velocity, can be consi<strong>de</strong>red<br />

formally as stationary, due to the fact that the equations (1)-(3) can<br />

be transformed to the rotat<strong>in</strong>g frame anchored to the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal axes so<br />

that does not appear explicitly; obviously, the analog of such nonaxisymmetric<br />

configurations <strong>in</strong> general relativity (whatever they might<br />

be) would not be stationary, as they would emit gravitational radiation.<br />

Another <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g stationary axisymmetric configuration is a torus-like<br />

figure rotat<strong>in</strong>g around its symmetry axis. It was shown to exist (among<br />

other highly <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g results) <strong>in</strong> a very important paper of Po<strong>in</strong>caré<br />

[3], <strong>and</strong> was further analyzed <strong>in</strong> [4] by means of power series expansions.<br />

In what follows, we shall concentrate on the stationary, axisymmetric<br />

case with azimuthal flow of equations (1)-(4); the is taken to be<br />

the symmetry axis. By impos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> (where<br />

<strong>de</strong>notes the Lie <strong>de</strong>rivative <strong>in</strong> the direction of the vectorfield<br />

<strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g the azimuthal angle), one f<strong>in</strong>ds<br />

where is the angular velocity,<br />

<strong>de</strong>pend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> general on the position with<strong>in</strong> the fluid (possible differential<br />

rotation). Tak<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>to account, one has <strong>and</strong><br />

From these <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegrability conditions for the set of<br />

three scalar equations aris<strong>in</strong>g from (2), one gets (tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to<br />

account that <strong>and</strong> are functionally <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt, accord<strong>in</strong>g to (4)), so<br />

that the angular velocity <strong>de</strong>pends only on the distance to the rotation<br />

axis: where we have <strong>de</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ed It is easy to see that<br />

the cont<strong>in</strong>uity equation (1) is automatically satisfied un<strong>de</strong>r the assumed<br />

symmetries (which also require <strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> particular, the<br />

fluid flow has vanish<strong>in</strong>g expansion. Equations (l)-(3) now reduce to the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g ones:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!