28.11.2012 Views

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On the experimental foundation of Maxwell’s equations 303<br />

tional constancy, the isotropy, of <strong>and</strong> Kennedy–Thorndike–experiments<br />

[15, 16] <strong>and</strong> experiments like that of Alväger <strong>and</strong> coworkers [27] the <strong>in</strong><strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce<br />

of from the velocity of the laboratory <strong>and</strong> of the source.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Robertson [28] from the Michelson–Morley <strong>and</strong> Kennedy–<br />

Thorndike experiments together with experiments yield<strong>in</strong>g the time dilation<br />

factor one can <strong>de</strong>rive Special Relativity. The most<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>rn version of these experiments give for the<br />

isotropy of light [14] <strong>and</strong> for the <strong>in</strong><strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce of the<br />

velocity of light from the velocity of the source [16].<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the properties of the used <strong>in</strong>terferometer arms or cavities are <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />

by the electromagnetic field, too, one has to be careful about the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation of these experiments: It could be shown [17] that with<strong>in</strong><br />

the mo<strong>de</strong>l (19) un<strong>de</strong>r certa<strong>in</strong> conditions no effect <strong>in</strong> these experiments<br />

can be <strong>de</strong>tected though there is an anisotropic speed of light. However,<br />

these conditions, though be<strong>in</strong>g not exotic, are not fulfilled by the above<br />

mentioned experiments so that the usual <strong>in</strong>terpretation is still valid.<br />

4.5. SUPERPOSITION PRINCIPLE<br />

For a non–l<strong>in</strong>ear theory like the Heisenberg–Euler or Born–Infeld theory<br />

the superposition pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is no longer valid. That the effective<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rly<strong>in</strong>g theory for the electromagnetic field should be non–l<strong>in</strong>ear has<br />

been <strong>de</strong>monstrated through <strong>in</strong>elastic photon–photon scatter<strong>in</strong>g [29]. But<br />

also other effects should occur: In the frame of the Heisenberg–Euler<br />

theory the effect of birefr<strong>in</strong>gence of a propagat<strong>in</strong>g weak electromagnetic<br />

wave <strong>in</strong> strong electromagnetic fields has first been calculated by Adler<br />

[30]. This effect now seems to be <strong>in</strong> the range of <strong>de</strong>tectability [31]. Also<br />

<strong>in</strong> the case of the Born–Infeld theory the dispersion of propagat<strong>in</strong>g waves<br />

has been <strong>de</strong>rived <strong>and</strong> shown to be measurable [32, 33].<br />

5. ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATIONS<br />

Although <strong>in</strong> astrophysical observations the observer cannot manipulate<br />

the creation of electromagnetic waves <strong>and</strong> the boundary conditions<br />

<strong>and</strong> cannot move arbitrarily <strong>in</strong> space but is rigidly attached to the earth,<br />

strong estimates can be drawn on those terms <strong>de</strong>scrib<strong>in</strong>g <strong>de</strong>viations from<br />

the usual Maxwell equation. The ma<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t is that if the source emits a<br />

unique signal, then this signal usually is distributed over all frequencies<br />

<strong>and</strong> polarizations. In this case we can make two k<strong>in</strong>ds of observations<br />

relevant for our analysis: First we compare the time–of–arrival of the signal<br />

<strong>in</strong> one frequency range with the time–of–arrival of the same signal<br />

<strong>in</strong> another frequency range, that is we compare the velocities connected<br />

with the two frequencies, <strong>and</strong> second we compare the ar-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!