Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...
Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...
Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8 EXACT SOLUTIONS AND SCALAR FIELDS IN GRAVITY<br />
fluids rotat<strong>in</strong>g rigidly have been subsequently found. Unfortunately,<br />
none of them has been shown so far to possess a correspond<strong>in</strong>g asymptotically<br />
flat exterior solution, <strong>in</strong> such a way that the over<strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
match<strong>in</strong>g conditions (which <strong>in</strong> general relativity are the cont<strong>in</strong>uity of<br />
the metric <strong>and</strong> of its first <strong>de</strong>rivatives across the boundary of the object)<br />
are satisfied. (Obviously, we are disregard<strong>in</strong>g stationary axisymmetric<br />
configurations with extra Kill<strong>in</strong>g vectors, such as the case of cyl<strong>in</strong>drical<br />
symmetry, which is irrelevant for astrophysical objects.)<br />
The first stationary axisymmetric <strong>in</strong>terior solution <strong>in</strong> general relativity<br />
for a barotropic perfect fluid with differential (i.e. non-rigid) rotation<br />
<strong>and</strong> only two Kill<strong>in</strong>g vectors appeared <strong>in</strong> 1990 [8]; the case consi<strong>de</strong>red<br />
there was one of vanish<strong>in</strong>g vorticity (irrotational case). Let me now<br />
<strong>de</strong>scribe briefly the formalism we <strong>de</strong>veloped for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that solution<br />
(the formalism itself was published later <strong>in</strong> <strong>de</strong>tail <strong>in</strong> a separate, larger<br />
paper [9]).<br />
An orthonormal tetrad of 1-forms, is <strong>in</strong>troduced, with<br />
the choice (where is the velocity 1-form of the fluid). The<br />
presence of two commut<strong>in</strong>g Kill<strong>in</strong>g fields <strong>and</strong> such that they can<br />
be i<strong>de</strong>ntified with <strong>and</strong> is assumed (where is a time<br />
coord<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>and</strong> a cyclic one, <strong>and</strong> <strong>de</strong>notes the contravariant expression<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the 1-form etc.). The flow is assumed to be<br />
azimuthal: If we are <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> non-trivial situations, we<br />
have to make sure (perhaps a posteriori, after some solution is found)<br />
that we are not <strong>de</strong>al<strong>in</strong>g with a static case, by check<strong>in</strong>g that there does<br />
not exist a timelike Kill<strong>in</strong>g vector such that For the reasons<br />
given above, we f<strong>in</strong>d it preferable that there be no additional <strong>in</strong><strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt<br />
Kill<strong>in</strong>g vectors (especially if the extra Kill<strong>in</strong>g field commutes with<br />
<strong>and</strong> which could be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to a cyl<strong>in</strong>drical or<br />
some such physically un<strong>de</strong>sirable symmetry). By a st<strong>and</strong>ard reduction,<br />
<strong>and</strong> are chosen as ly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the subspace. Due to the<br />
symmetries, the coord<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>and</strong> are ignorable, <strong>and</strong> the coefficients<br />
of the tetrad 1-forms (<strong>and</strong> of all the differential forms that appear <strong>in</strong><br />
the formulation) may only <strong>de</strong>pend on two additional coord<strong>in</strong>ates. The<br />
energy-momentum tensor is taken to be where<br />
is the spacetime metric, the velocity 1-form, the pressure, <strong>and</strong><br />
µ the energy <strong>de</strong>nsity of the fluid. Hodge duality <strong>in</strong> the subspace<br />
is <strong>de</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>and</strong> It is an important feature<br />
of the system un<strong>de</strong>r consi<strong>de</strong>ration that one can write <strong>and</strong><br />
where is the shear tensor <strong>and</strong> the vorticity<br />
2-tensor; (“<strong>de</strong>formity”) <strong>and</strong> (“roticity”) are 1-forms which carry the<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation for the shear <strong>and</strong> the vorticity, respectively. With a be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the acceleration of the fluid, a connection 1-form <strong>in</strong> the