28.11.2012 Views

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REFERENCES 269<br />

The boundary is constituted at its <strong>in</strong>terior by the event horizon<br />

<strong>and</strong> at the <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity by the asymptotic regions. S<strong>in</strong>ce the potential<br />

U is constant over each one of the connected components of these<br />

boundaries, it can be pulled out from each one of the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

boundary <strong>in</strong>tegrals <strong>in</strong> the left h<strong>and</strong> si<strong>de</strong> of (14).<br />

The asymptotic regions <strong>and</strong> the connected components of the horizon<br />

are all topological 2–spheres [8, 25], by this reason the left h<strong>and</strong> si<strong>de</strong> of<br />

(14) vanishes; from Stokes theorem, the <strong>in</strong>tegral of an exact form over a<br />

manifold without boundary is zero. Thereby, it is satisfied that<br />

The <strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> (15) is non–negative, due to the fact that is a<br />

spacelike 1–form s<strong>in</strong>ce it is orthogonal by <strong>de</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ition to the timelike field<br />

(4). Hence, it follows that (15) is satisfied if <strong>and</strong> only if the <strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>and</strong><br />

vanishes <strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> by stationarity it also vanishes <strong>in</strong> all the doma<strong>in</strong> of<br />

outer communications consequently<br />

From the previous conclusion (16), it follows that <strong>in</strong><br />

but by the cont<strong>in</strong>uity of <strong>in</strong> all of <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> particular<br />

through the lower dimensional surfaces that constitute the regions<br />

vanishes also <strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> accord<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong> all the doma<strong>in</strong> of outer<br />

communications Hence, the staticity theorem is proved.<br />

3. CONCLUSIONS<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, it is conclu<strong>de</strong>d that for a non–rotat<strong>in</strong>g strictly stationary<br />

black hole with a self–<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g scalar field non–m<strong>in</strong>imally coupled to<br />

gravity, the correspond<strong>in</strong>g doma<strong>in</strong> of outer communications is static if<br />

analytic field configurations are consi<strong>de</strong>red. As <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>imal case [15]<br />

this result rema<strong>in</strong>s valid when no horizon is present.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

The author thanks Alberto García by its <strong>in</strong>centive <strong>in</strong> the study of this<br />

topics <strong>and</strong> by its support <strong>in</strong> the course of the <strong>in</strong>vestigation. This research<br />

was partially supported by the CONACyT Grant 32138E. The author<br />

also thanks all the encouragement <strong>and</strong> gui<strong>de</strong> provi<strong>de</strong>d by his recently<br />

late father: Erasmo Ayón Alayo, Ibae Ibae Ibayen Torun.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!