28.11.2012 Views

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

New Directions for the New Millennium 17<br />

Our discovery of the generalized Alekseev equation permitted us to<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntify a transformation group that is significantly larger than that associated<br />

with K<strong>in</strong>nersley–Chitre transformations. This <strong>in</strong>volved, among<br />

other th<strong>in</strong>gs, show<strong>in</strong>g that, un<strong>de</strong>r appropriately chosen premises, solv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the generalized Alekseev equation was equivalent to solv<strong>in</strong>g a certa<strong>in</strong><br />

Fredholm equation of the second k<strong>in</strong>d. The complete proof [8] is rather<br />

lengthy.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

This proof is divi<strong>de</strong>d <strong>in</strong>to six sections:<br />

Statement of our generalized Geroch conjecture<br />

Alekseev–type s<strong>in</strong>gular <strong>in</strong>tegral equation equivalent to our HHP<br />

Fredholm <strong>in</strong>tegral equation equivalent to Alekseev-type equation<br />

Existence <strong>and</strong> properties of the HHP solution<br />

Derivatives of <strong>and</strong> H<br />

Proof of our generalized Geroch conjecture<br />

It should be emphasized that, <strong>in</strong> or<strong>de</strong>r to formulate properly a generalized<br />

Geroch conjecture, years of work were required before we even<br />

arrived at the formulation that we spelled out <strong>in</strong> Sec. 1. This started<br />

with a complete analysis of the Weyl case, where all objects we used<br />

could be worked out explicitly.<br />

In <strong>de</strong>velop<strong>in</strong>g this proof, we had to be very careful to specify the<br />

doma<strong>in</strong>s of all the potentials we were employ<strong>in</strong>g, whereas <strong>in</strong> the proofs<br />

that we <strong>de</strong>veloped for the Geroch conjecture itself <strong>in</strong> the early 1980s,<br />

the assumption of an sufficed to guarantee analyticity.<br />

Initially we employed <strong>in</strong> this more recent work quite general doma<strong>in</strong>s for<br />

our but it turned out that noth<strong>in</strong>g was ga<strong>in</strong>ed thereby, <strong>and</strong><br />

we eventually elected to use certa<strong>in</strong> diamond shaped regions boun<strong>de</strong>d by<br />

null l<strong>in</strong>es. In certa<strong>in</strong> cases these diamond shaped regions were truncated<br />

when one reached the analog of the “axis” <strong>in</strong> the case of the<br />

elliptic Ernst equation. In the case of the hyperbolic Ernst equation,<br />

is where collid<strong>in</strong>g wave solutions typically exhibit either horizons<br />

or s<strong>in</strong>gular behavior.<br />

We employed one of many l<strong>in</strong>ear systems for the Ernst equation. It<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved a 2 × 2 matrix field <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt upon the spectral parameter<br />

The doma<strong>in</strong> of this field was specified with equal care. Then we i<strong>de</strong>ntified<br />

a set of permissible <strong>and</strong> stated a homogeneous<br />

Hilbert problem on arcs, analogous to the HHP that we had formulated<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1980 on a closed contour to h<strong>and</strong>le the far simpler problem we were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!