28.11.2012 Views

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On the experimental foundation of Maxwell’s equations 307<br />

5.4. CHARGE CONSERVATION<br />

If we aga<strong>in</strong> associate the time <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce of the f<strong>in</strong>e structure constant<br />

with charge–nonconservation, then astrophysical estimates on<br />

can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as test of charge conservation. In a recent paper<br />

[44] the cosmological constra<strong>in</strong>t on a time <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce of is given by<br />

5.5. MAGNETIC FIELDS<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce macroscopic objects like stars <strong>in</strong> general are neutral, there is<br />

no way to observe the potential of a charged astrophysical object. However,<br />

most astrophysical objects possess a magnetic moment so that there<br />

is a magnetic field around. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the measurement or observation<br />

of the magnetic field of the earth, of our galaxy or of a cluster of<br />

galaxies gives very good restrictions on <strong>de</strong>viations from the usual Maxell<br />

equations. The best foun<strong>de</strong>d estimate <strong>in</strong> the framework of a scalar<br />

photon mass of this k<strong>in</strong>d is of Goldhaber <strong>and</strong> Nieto [45, 24] <strong>and</strong> gives<br />

There are better estimates from the consi<strong>de</strong>ration of<br />

galactic or <strong>in</strong>tergalactic magnetic fields but these are loa<strong>de</strong>d with more<br />

assumptions <strong>and</strong> uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties.<br />

5.6. TESTS FOR SPECIAL RELATIVITY<br />

While it is not possible to test the isotropy of light propagation because<br />

we cannot send light <strong>in</strong> different directions, it is possible to analyze<br />

the motion of stars <strong>in</strong> or<strong>de</strong>r to get results about whether the velocity of<br />

light <strong>de</strong>pends on the motion of the source or not. Such an analysis has<br />

been carried through by K. Brecher [46]. If the velocity of light <strong>de</strong>pends<br />

on the velocity of the source, then the light which we observe<br />

should possess different velocities accord<strong>in</strong>g to the velocity the star had<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g emission. This <strong>in</strong> general should lead to multiple images of the<br />

same star e.g. dur<strong>in</strong>g evolution around a b<strong>in</strong>ary compagnion. This has<br />

never been observed. In the case of small velocities we may exp<strong>and</strong><br />

where is the velocity of the star <strong>and</strong> the velocity of<br />

light if the star is at rest, the observation of Hercules X1 place a limit<br />

If we analyze the short events of pulses <strong>in</strong> the same<br />

way, one may reach<br />

6. CONCLUSION<br />

Collect<strong>in</strong>g the above listed experiments <strong>and</strong> observations, one arrives<br />

<strong>in</strong> terms of the parameters <strong>de</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the generalized Maxwell equations<br />

(17) at the follow<strong>in</strong>g rough estimates

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!