28.11.2012 Views

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lorentz force free charged fluids <strong>in</strong> general relativity 313<br />

The Kill<strong>in</strong>g vectors I, II <strong>and</strong> IV are everywhere timelike, III spacelike,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Kill<strong>in</strong>g vector V has a sign-<strong>in</strong><strong>de</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite square, thus <strong>in</strong> some<br />

parts of the space it is timelike <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> other parts, spacelike. Due to<br />

the commutation properties of the three isometries correspond<strong>in</strong>g to I,<br />

II <strong>and</strong> IV, only two of them (always <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g I) can be simultaneously<br />

used to <strong>in</strong>troduce coord<strong>in</strong>ates of which the metric coefficients will not <strong>de</strong>pend<br />

(the coefficients of their squared differentials will be therefore both<br />

positive – timelike axes). The third Kill<strong>in</strong>g coord<strong>in</strong>ate available simultaneously<br />

with these two, is clearly spacelike. Of course, it seems<br />

strange to use two timelike axes at once, though this is always exactly<br />

the case <strong>in</strong> <strong>de</strong>al<strong>in</strong>g with the Gö<strong>de</strong>l spacetime. What is not less exotic,<br />

there exists the third alternative <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of one of this pair of<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ates: it can <strong>in</strong>volve the Kill<strong>in</strong>g coord<strong>in</strong>ate correspond<strong>in</strong>g to V<br />

which naturally exclu<strong>de</strong>s the possibility of simultaneous use of the coord<strong>in</strong>ates<br />

which are Kill<strong>in</strong>gian with respect to II <strong>and</strong> IV. The situation<br />

really is <strong>in</strong> its full extent a rare exception <strong>in</strong> the theory of spacetime.<br />

The real physical signature (+ – – –) of the Gö<strong>de</strong>l spacetime is easily<br />

seen from the existence of the orthonormal tetrad (with the normalization<br />

properties correspond<strong>in</strong>g to this signature) <strong>in</strong> this spacetime, for<br />

example, the natural tetrads of (1) <strong>and</strong> (5). The very same consi<strong>de</strong>ration<br />

saves time <strong>in</strong> the calculation of the metric tensor <strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>ant: e.g.,<br />

<strong>in</strong> the case of (2), which<br />

yields simply<br />

The fact that there exists only one Kill<strong>in</strong>g vector which is spacelike <strong>in</strong><br />

all spacetime, does not mean, of course, absence of spatial homogeneity<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Gö<strong>de</strong>l universe. There are l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ations (with constant coefficients)<br />

of Kill<strong>in</strong>g vectors be<strong>in</strong>g as well spacelike, though this property<br />

is limited to certa<strong>in</strong> regions of spacetime (similar to the situation with<br />

the Kill<strong>in</strong>g vector V), the region <strong>de</strong>pend<strong>in</strong>g of the choice of constants<br />

<strong>and</strong> never embrac<strong>in</strong>g the whole spacetime. Thus the homogeneity property<br />

of the Gö<strong>de</strong>l universe is strictly local, but it covers all the spacetime<br />

piecewise. Similarly, the local essentially stationary property is known<br />

for the ergosphere region of the Kerr solution (see [10], p. 331).<br />

Many authors subdivi<strong>de</strong> the multitu<strong>de</strong> of exact solutions <strong>in</strong>to “physical”<br />

<strong>and</strong> “unphysical” subsets. My op<strong>in</strong>ion is that the po<strong>in</strong>t of view<br />

that <strong>in</strong> the well established physical theories there could be present unphysical<br />

solutions <strong>and</strong> effects alongsi<strong>de</strong> with the “good”, physical ones,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!