28.11.2012 Views

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Self–gravitat<strong>in</strong>g stationary axisymmetric perfect fluids 7<br />

condition (11) for the boundary value (16) is easily found to be<br />

but (as was to be expected from the obviously <strong>in</strong>a<strong>de</strong>quate Ansatz), (12)<br />

is not satisfied:<br />

on unless one of the follow<strong>in</strong>g holds:<br />

(a) (giv<strong>in</strong>g i.e. no fluid), or<br />

(b) (static case).<br />

Ignor<strong>in</strong>g these two <strong>de</strong>generate cases, there will be a discont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>in</strong> the<br />

gravitational force, expressed by (18); it would be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as the<br />

appearance of a surface layer at the fluid boundary, which artificially<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>s the rotat<strong>in</strong>g body to keep the spherical shape we had assumed.<br />

By mak<strong>in</strong>g virtue out of necessity, a similar behavior <strong>in</strong> the<br />

general relativistic case is sometimes “expla<strong>in</strong>ed” a posteriori by an <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />

<strong>in</strong> terms of crusts, etc. But if we adopt a more conservative<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t of view (namely, if we stick to the perfect fluid case we started<br />

out with) such a situation is clearly un<strong>de</strong>sirable <strong>and</strong> signals a failure <strong>in</strong><br />

satisfy<strong>in</strong>g all the conditions <strong>in</strong>herent to the problem. All this is a consequence<br />

of the fact that we are not <strong>de</strong>al<strong>in</strong>g with a Dirichlet-type problem<br />

(nor even with a Cauchy-type one!), but with a free-boundary problem.<br />

Unfortunately, the panoply of exist<strong>in</strong>g mathematical techniques for an<br />

exact treatment of such problems is yet quite limited.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, let us mention that various <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g rigorous results for<br />

Newtonian configurations have been proven over the years. For lack of<br />

space, we refra<strong>in</strong> from discuss<strong>in</strong>g them here <strong>and</strong> giv<strong>in</strong>g an exhaustive list<br />

of references; please see [5] for further references, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those to <strong>de</strong>ep<br />

mathematical results that have appeared s<strong>in</strong>ce the classic monograph [6]<br />

was published.<br />

3. INTERIOR SOLUTIONS WITH<br />

DIFFERENTIAL ROTATION IN<br />

GENERAL RELATIVITY<br />

Clearly, all the difficulties associated with an exact treatment of rotat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

perfect fluid configurations <strong>in</strong> the Newtonian approach are tremendously<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> general relativity. As a matter of fact, it was only <strong>in</strong><br />

1968 that H.D. Wahlquist found for the first time an exact <strong>de</strong>scription<br />

of the <strong>in</strong>terior of a particular general relativistic axisymmetric perfect<br />

fluid for the special case of stationary rigid rotation (vanish<strong>in</strong>g shear of<br />

the fluid) [7]. Several other particular <strong>in</strong>terior solutions for barotropic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!