28.11.2012 Views

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

Exact Solutions and Scalar Fields in Gravity - Instituto Avanzado de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 EXACT SOLUTIONS AND SCALAR FIELDS IN GRAVITY<br />

The analytical expression for the boundary <strong>in</strong> the stationary axisymmetric<br />

case with azimuthal flow is thus <strong>and</strong> on that<br />

surface (11) <strong>and</strong> (12) should hold. Obviously, the dust case is special, <strong>in</strong><br />

that (14) does not characterize its boundary (14) is i<strong>de</strong>ntically satisfied<br />

throughout space!); <strong>in</strong> that case, the boundary is given by the surface(s)<br />

where (11) <strong>and</strong> (12) are mutually consistent.<br />

2. DIRICHLET BOUNDARY PROBLEM VS.<br />

FREE-BOUNDARY PROBLEM<br />

Part of the technical difficulties associated with the problem of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

equilibrium configurations for self-gravitat<strong>in</strong>g fluids is due to the over<strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

character of conditions (11) <strong>and</strong> (12); <strong>in</strong> fact, the boundary is<br />

<strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>ed by the consistency of (11), (12), <strong>and</strong> (14). The classical<br />

equilibrium figures we have mentioned <strong>in</strong> the previous section were all<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed by means of Ansätze that turn out to be consistent (an important<br />

role is played by the fact that the Newtonian potential for an<br />

ellipsoidal body can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> closed form <strong>in</strong> the case of constant<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity objects, <strong>and</strong> the result<strong>in</strong>g potential does not <strong>de</strong>pend on the motion<br />

of the body, i.e. there are no Newtonian gravitomagnetic effects.)<br />

In that sense, the free-boundary problem is not really solved ab <strong>in</strong>itio<br />

for those examples, but happy co<strong>in</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>nces <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>sights are exploited.<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to illustrate the fact that wild guesses are doomed to failure,<br />

let us consi<strong>de</strong>r the follow<strong>in</strong>g naive attempt at gett<strong>in</strong>g a rigidly rotat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

configuration for a homogeneous (i.e. constant <strong>de</strong>nsity) body. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegral (9) gives<br />

<strong>and</strong> substitut<strong>in</strong>g (15) <strong>in</strong> (8), we get Assume now<br />

the (<strong>in</strong>tuitively wrong!) Ansatz with By<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g the previous equation for we f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

where <strong>and</strong> are constants; if we set for regularity<br />

at the pressure can be expressed as where<br />

<strong>de</strong>notes the pressure at By substitut<strong>in</strong>g back <strong>in</strong> (15), we get<br />

where is a constant.<br />

Let be the surface Then, <strong>and</strong><br />

the boundary value of U is<br />

where is the appropriate Legendre polynomial, <strong>and</strong> the usual spherical<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ate. The exterior gravitational potential satisfy<strong>in</strong>g (10) <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!