29.11.2012 Views

business plan for 2004 - EDP

business plan for 2004 - EDP

business plan for 2004 - EDP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 TELECOMMUNICATIONS<br />

>> 2.1 Global Framework<br />

2003 was marked by the slowdown of economic activity<br />

that had been felt since 2002, with an inevitable impact on<br />

the telecommunications sector, particularly sensitive to<br />

the economic cycle.<br />

Against a background influenced by ef<strong>for</strong>ts to reduce<br />

costs and to increase operating efficiency, implemented<br />

by most economic agents, the ONI Group maintained its<br />

growth, achieving consolidated revenues of more than<br />

€310 million, about 25% more than in 2002.<br />

The Group’s environment both in Portugal and in Spain<br />

continued to be extremely adverse, and the barriers<br />

imposed by regulatory questions have been maintained,<br />

preventing any real competition. The main difficulties<br />

have to do with access to the local loop and also with the<br />

costs of interconnection with the networks of the<br />

incumbents, whose tariffs are among the highest in<br />

Europe.<br />

2003 was also influenced by the conclusion of the process<br />

of termination of the <strong>business</strong> of ONI Way and by the<br />

exercise of the sale option on the whole of the company’s<br />

share capital.<br />

>> 2.2 Organisation and Business of the ONI<br />

Group<br />

During 2003 and in the wake of the concentration of the<br />

group’s activity on the fixed <strong>business</strong>, the Group’s<br />

structure was reorganised and now has the following<br />

<strong>business</strong> composition:<br />

ONI<br />

Telecom<br />

ONI Group<br />

Comunitel Ucall<br />

ONI<br />

Multimédia<br />

Portugal<br />

Regulatory Evolution<br />

The evolution of the regulatory framework of the<br />

industry in Portugal was influenced in 2003 by the<br />

process of transposition and implementation of the new<br />

regulatory framework of the European Union, which<br />

should have come into <strong>for</strong>ce in the various Member States<br />

on July 25, and, in Portugal, by the start to the duties of<br />

the Competition Authority and by the need <strong>for</strong> ongoing<br />

intervention by the sector regulator (ANACOM).<br />

As far as the fixed networks are concerned, there<br />

continued to exist a clearly insufficient degree of<br />

competition, reflected in the maintenance or even increase<br />

(as in the case of services supported on ADSL technology)<br />

of the market share of the incumbent operator, which<br />

continues to hold about 90% of telephone traffic and 95%<br />

of direct accesses, having increased its broadband market<br />

share to about 80%.<br />

The incumbent operator there<strong>for</strong>e continued to benefit<br />

from the situation, strange in European terms, of holding<br />

at the same time the basic telecommunications network<br />

and the principal cable TV network, which was not<br />

subject to any structural measure, nor were its negative<br />

effects even reduced by an approach to best European<br />

practice in terms of conditions of access to the basic<br />

network.<br />

The main aspect to remember as far as the legislative<br />

framework is concerned has naturally to do with the<br />

delay seen in Portugal to the process of transposition of<br />

the new Community framework, which, despite the fact<br />

that it involved no public hearing, contrary to what was<br />

seen in other countries, was approved by the Assembly of<br />

the Republic only in December, with its publication<br />

consequently postponed to <strong>2004</strong>.<br />

Notwithstanding the activity of the regulator during 2003<br />

and in previous years, there continued to be several<br />

constraints of a legal and regulatory nature that<br />

significantly conditioned the development of real<br />

competition in the fixed network services market. In most<br />

cases they were recurrent issues that have not yet been<br />

subject to any deliberation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!