12.07.2015 Views

BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2011 - Company Reporting

BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2011 - Company Reporting

BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2011 - Company Reporting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Business reviewby individuals, corporations <strong>and</strong> governmental entities. The ultimate costsfor these claims cannot be determined at this time. We also expect theindustry in general, <strong>and</strong> <strong>BP</strong> in particular, to become subject to greaterregulation <strong>and</strong> increased operating costs in the Gulf of Mexico in thefuture. For further disclosures relating to the consequences of the <strong>20</strong>10Deepwater Horizon oil spill, see Legal proceedings on page 160.On 31 March <strong>20</strong>09, the United States filed a complaint seeking civilpenalties <strong>and</strong> damages relating to oil leaks from oil transit lines operated by<strong>BP</strong> Exploration (Alaska) Inc. (<strong>BP</strong>XA) at the Prudhoe Bay unit on the NorthSlope of Alaska. (See Legal proceedings on page 165.) The complaint alsoinvolved claims related to asbestos h<strong>and</strong>ling, allegations of non-complianceat multiple facilities for failure to comply with EPA’s spill prevention planregulations, <strong>and</strong> for non-compliance with US Department of Transportationorders <strong>and</strong> regulations. The parties settled the dispute <strong>and</strong> on 13 July <strong>20</strong>11the Court entered a Consent Agreement in which <strong>BP</strong>XA agreed to pay a$25-million penalty <strong>and</strong> to perform certain injunctive measures over thenext three years with respect to pipeline inspection <strong>and</strong> maintenance.Various environmental groups <strong>and</strong> the EPA have challengedcertain aspects of the air permits issued by the Indiana Department ofEnvironmental Management (IDEM) for upgrades to the Whiting refinery.In response to these challenges, the IDEM has reviewed the permits <strong>and</strong>responded formally to the EPA. <strong>BP</strong> is in discussions with EPA, the IDEM<strong>and</strong> certain environmental groups over these <strong>and</strong> other CAA issues relatingto the Whiting refinery. <strong>BP</strong> has also been in settlement discussions withEPA to resolve alleged CAA violations at the Toledo, Carson <strong>and</strong> CherryPoint refineries.European Union<strong>BP</strong>’s operations in the EU are subject to a number of current <strong>and</strong> proposedregulatory requirements that affect or could affect our operations <strong>and</strong>profitability. These include:• The EU Climate <strong>and</strong> Energy Package <strong>and</strong> the Emissions Trading Scheme(ETS) Directive (see Greenhouse gas regulation on page 109).• The EU Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) (revising <strong>and</strong> replacing theIntegrated Pollution Prevention <strong>and</strong> Control Directive (IPPC) <strong>and</strong> severalother industrial directives including the Large Combustion Plant Directive(LCPD)) are in the process of transposition by the EU Member States.The IED provides the framework for setting permits for major industrialsites. Relative to IPPC <strong>and</strong> LCPD, the IED imposes tighter emissionst<strong>and</strong>ards for some large combustion plants <strong>and</strong> is more prescriptiveregarding the setting of emission of limit values based on use of BestAvailable Techniques (BAT) in permits for other discharges to air <strong>and</strong>water. The emission limit values are informed by the Sector specific <strong>and</strong>cross-Sector BAT Reference documents (BREFs) which are reviewedperiodically. The outcome of the review of several BREFs key to ourmajor sites is expected in <strong>20</strong>12/<strong>20</strong>13. The IED transposition <strong>and</strong> outputfrom the BREF revisions may result in requirements for further emissionreductions at our EU sites.• The European Commission Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution <strong>and</strong> therelated work on revisions to the Gothenburg Protocol <strong>and</strong> NationalEmissions Ceiling Directive (NECD) will establish national ceilings foremissions of a variety of air pollutants in order to achieve EU-wide health<strong>and</strong> environmental improvement targets. This may result in requirementsfor further emission reductions at our EU sites.• The EU Regulation on ozone depleting substances (ODS), whichimplements the Montreal Protocol (Protocol) on ODS was most recentlyrevised in <strong>20</strong>09. It requires <strong>BP</strong> to reduce the use of ODS <strong>and</strong> phaseout use of certain ODS substances. <strong>BP</strong> continues to replace ODS inrefrigerants <strong>and</strong>/or equipment, in the EU <strong>and</strong> elsewhere, in accordancewith the Protocol <strong>and</strong> related legislation. Methyl bromide (an ODS) isa minor by-product in the production of purified terephthalic acid inour petrochemicals operations. The progressive phase-out of methylbromide uses may result in future pressure to reduce our emissions ofmethyl bromide.• The EU Fuels Quality Directive affects our production <strong>and</strong> marketing oftransport fuels. Revisions adopted in <strong>20</strong>09 m<strong>and</strong>ate reductions in thelife cycle GHG emissions per unit of energy as described in Greenhousegas regulation above, <strong>and</strong> tighter environmental fuel quality st<strong>and</strong>ardsfor petrol <strong>and</strong> diesel (for example see Greenhouse gas regulation onpage 109).• The EU Registration, Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Authorization of Chemicals (REACH)Regulation requires registration of chemical substances, manufacturedin, or imported into, the EU in quantities greater than 1 tonne per annumper legal entity, together with the submission of relevant hazard <strong>and</strong>risk data. REACH affects our refining, petrochemicals, exploration <strong>and</strong>production, biofuels, lubricants <strong>and</strong> other manufacturing or trading/importoperations.• Having completed registration of all the substances that we wererequired to submit by the regulatory deadline of 1 December <strong>20</strong>10,we are now preparing registration dossiers for those substances(manufactured or imported in amounts in the range 100-1,000 tonnesper annum/legal entity) that are due to be submitted before 1 June<strong>20</strong>13. Substances registered in <strong>20</strong>10 are subject to evaluation <strong>and</strong>/or authorization/restriction procedures by the authorities <strong>and</strong> this mayimpact activities, product sales <strong>and</strong> their profitability.• In addition, Europe has adopted the UN Global Harmonization Systemfor hazard classification <strong>and</strong> labelling of chemicals <strong>and</strong> products throughthe Classification Labelling <strong>and</strong> Packaging (CLP) Regulation. Thisrequires us to assess the hazards of all of our chemicals <strong>and</strong> productsagainst new criteria <strong>and</strong> will, over time, result in significant changes towarning labels <strong>and</strong> material safety data sheets. All our European MaterialSafety Data Sheets will need to be updated to include both REACH<strong>and</strong> CLP information. We have completed updates for all chemicalssubstances we manufacture <strong>and</strong> market in the EU by the compliancedeadline of 3 January <strong>20</strong>11, <strong>and</strong> have implemented a process tomaintain compliance in our European operations. We have also notifiedthe European Chemicals Agency of hazard classifications for ourmanufactured <strong>and</strong> imported chemicals, for inclusion in a publicly availableinventory of hazardous chemicals. CLP will also apply to mixtures(e.g. lubricants) by <strong>20</strong>15. Activities covered by both CLP <strong>and</strong> REACHare subject to possible enforcement activity by national regulatoryauthorities.• In the UK, significant health <strong>and</strong> safety legislation affecting <strong>BP</strong> includesthe Health <strong>and</strong> Safety at Work Act <strong>and</strong> regulations <strong>and</strong> the Control ofMajor Accident Hazards Regulations.The EU Commission has proposed the adoption of a regulation on safetyof offshore oil <strong>and</strong> gas prospection, exploration <strong>and</strong> production activities.The proposed regulation aims to introduce harmonized regulation of thepotential environmental, health <strong>and</strong> safety impacts of the offshore oil <strong>and</strong>gas industry throughout EU waters. Although it is at an early stage in thelegislative process, as published the proposal is not entirely aligned withthe regime operating in the UK <strong>and</strong> could also, if adopted, have the effectof extending liability for clean-up <strong>and</strong> compensation of environmentaldamage to marine waters.Environmental maritime regulations<strong>BP</strong>’s shipping operations are subject to extensive national <strong>and</strong> internationalregulations governing liability, operations, training, spill prevention <strong>and</strong>insurance. These include:• In US waters, OPA 90 imposes liability <strong>and</strong> spill prevention <strong>and</strong> planningrequirements governing, among others, tankers, barges <strong>and</strong> offshorefacilities. It also m<strong>and</strong>ates a levy on imported <strong>and</strong> domestically producedoil to fund the oil spill response. Some states, including Alaska,Washington, Oregon <strong>and</strong> California, impose additional liability for oilspills.• Outside US territorial waters, <strong>BP</strong> Shipping tankers are subject tointernational liability, spill response <strong>and</strong> preparedness regulationsunder the UN’s International Maritime Organization, including theInternational Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution, the MARPOL,the International Convention on Oil Pollution, Preparedness, Response<strong>and</strong> Co-operation <strong>and</strong> the International Convention on Civil Liabilityfor Bunker Oil Pollution Damage. In April <strong>20</strong>10, a new protocol, the108 <strong>BP</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Form</strong> <strong>20</strong>-F <strong>20</strong>11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!