12.07.2015 Views

BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2011 - Company Reporting

BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2011 - Company Reporting

BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2011 - Company Reporting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Business reviewLicence expiryThe Abu Dhabi onshore concession expires in January <strong>20</strong>14 with aconsequent reduction in production of approximately 140mb/d. The groupholds no other licences due to expire within the next three years thatwould have a significant impact on <strong>BP</strong>’s reserves or production.Resource progression<strong>BP</strong> manages its hydrocarbon resources in three major categories: prospectinventory, contingent resources <strong>and</strong> proved reserves. When a discoveryis made, volumes usually transfer from the prospect inventory to thecontingent resources category. The contingent resources move throughvarious sub-categories as their technical <strong>and</strong> commercial maturity increasesthrough appraisal activity.At the point of final investment decision, most proved reserves willbe categorized as proved undeveloped (PUD). Volumes will subsequentlybe re-categorized from PUD to proved developed (PD) as a consequenceof development activity. When part of a well’s proved reserves dependson a later phase of activity, only that portion of proved reserves associatedwith existing, available facilities <strong>and</strong> infrastructure moves to PD. The firstPD bookings will typically occur at the point of first oil or gas production.Major development projects typically take one to four years from the timeof initial booking of proved reserves to the start of production. Changes toproved reserves bookings may be made due to analysis of new or existingdata concerning production, reservoir performance, commercial factors,acquisition <strong>and</strong> disposal activity <strong>and</strong> additional reservoir developmentactivity.Volumes can also be added or removed from our portfolio throughacquisition or divestment of properties <strong>and</strong> projects. When we disposeof an interest in a property or project, the volumes associated with ouradopted plan of development for which we have a final investmentdecision will be removed from our proved reserves upon completion.When we acquire an interest in a property or project, the volumesassociated with the existing development <strong>and</strong> any committed projectswill be added to our proved reserves if <strong>BP</strong> has made a final investmentdecision <strong>and</strong> they satisfy the SEC’s criteria for attribution of proved status.Following the acquisition, additional volumes may be progressed to provedreserves from contingent.Contingent resources in a field will only be re-categorized as provedreserves when all the criteria for attribution of proved status have been met<strong>and</strong> the proved reserves are included in the business plan <strong>and</strong> scheduledfor development, typically within five years. The group will only bookproved reserves where development is scheduled to commence after fiveyears, if these proved reserves satisfy the SEC’s criteria for attribution ofproved status <strong>and</strong> <strong>BP</strong> management has reasonable certainty that theseproved reserves will be produced.At the end of <strong>20</strong>11, <strong>BP</strong> had material volumes of provedundeveloped reserves held for more than five years in Trinidad, as well asnon-material volumes in Australia, Azerbaijan, Norway, the UK <strong>and</strong> the US,that are part of ongoing development activities for which <strong>BP</strong> has a historicaltrack record of completing comparable projects in these countries.The volumes are being progressed as part of an adopted developmentplan where there are physical limits to the development timing suchas infrastructure limitations, contractual limits including gas deliverycommitments, late life compression <strong>and</strong> the complex nature of working inremote locations.<strong>BP</strong> has a three year average track record (since the adoption ofthe modernised rules for reporting) of converting <strong>20</strong>% of our provedundeveloped reserves (excluding disposals) to proved developed reserves.This equates to a turnover time of five years. We expect the turnover timeto remain at or below five years <strong>and</strong> anticipate no increase in the volume ofproved undeveloped reserves held for more than five years.In <strong>20</strong>11, we converted 1,062mmboe of proved undevelopedreserves to proved developed reserves through ongoing investment inour upstream development activities. Total development expenditure inExploration <strong>and</strong> Production, excluding midstream activities, was $13,329million in <strong>20</strong>11 ($10,194 million for subsidiaries <strong>and</strong> $3,135 million forequity-accounted entities). The major areas converted in <strong>20</strong>11 wereArgentina, Indonesia, Russia, Trinidad <strong>and</strong> the US. Revisions of previousestimates for proved undeveloped reserves are due to the impact ofyear-end price (net of 1%) <strong>and</strong> changes relating to field performance orwell results (99%). The table below describes the changes to our provedundeveloped reserves position through the year.volumes in mmboeProved undeveloped reserves at 1 January <strong>20</strong>11 7,899Revisions of previous estimates 693Improved recovery 522Discoveries <strong>and</strong> extensions 92Purchases 77Sales (302)Total in year proved undeveloped reserves changes 8,981Progressed to proved developed reserves (1,062)Proved undeveloped reserves at 31 December <strong>20</strong>11 7,919<strong>BP</strong> bases its proved reserves estimates on the requirement of reasonablecertainty with rigorous technical <strong>and</strong> commercial assessments based onconventional industry practice. <strong>BP</strong> only applies technologies that have beenfield tested <strong>and</strong> have been demonstrated to provide reasonably certainresults with consistency <strong>and</strong> repeatability in the formation being evaluatedor in an analogous formation. <strong>BP</strong> applies high-resolution seismic data forthe identification of reservoir extent <strong>and</strong> fluid contacts only where there isan overwhelming track record of success in its local application. In certaindeepwater fields <strong>BP</strong> has booked proved reserves before production flowtests are conducted, in part because of the significant safety, cost <strong>and</strong>environmental implications of conducting these tests. The industry hasmade substantial technological improvements in underst<strong>and</strong>ing, measuring<strong>and</strong> delineating reservoir properties without the need for flow tests. Todetermine reasonable certainty of commercial recovery, <strong>BP</strong> employs ageneral method of reserves assessment that relies on the integration ofthree types of data: (1) well data used to assess the local characteristics<strong>and</strong> conditions of reservoirs <strong>and</strong> fluids; (2) field scale seismic data toallow the interpolation <strong>and</strong> extrapolation of these characteristics outsidethe immediate area of the local well control; <strong>and</strong> (3) data from relevantanalogous fields. Well data includes appraisal wells or sidetrack holes, fulllogging suites, core data <strong>and</strong> fluid samples. <strong>BP</strong> considers the integrationof this data in certain cases to be superior to a flow test in providingunderst<strong>and</strong>ing of overall reservoir performance. The collection of datafrom logs, cores, wireline formation testers, pressures <strong>and</strong> fluid samplescalibrated to each other <strong>and</strong> to the seismic data can allow reservoirproperties to be determined over a greater volume than the localizedvolume of investigation associated with a short-term flow test. There isa strong track record of proved reserves recorded using these methods,validated by actual production levels.Governance<strong>BP</strong>’s centrally controlled process for proved reserves estimation approvalforms part of a holistic <strong>and</strong> integrated system of internal control. It consistsof the following elements:• Accountabilities of certain officers of the group to ensure that there isreview <strong>and</strong> approval of proved reserves bookings independent of theoperating business <strong>and</strong> that there are effective controls in the approvalprocess <strong>and</strong> verification that the proved reserves estimates <strong>and</strong> therelated financial impacts are reported in a timely manner.• Capital allocation processes, whereby delegated authority is exercisedto commit to capital projects that are consistent with the delivery of thegroup’s business plan. A formal review process exists to ensure thatboth technical <strong>and</strong> commercial criteria are met prior to the commitmentof capital to projects.• Internal audit, whose role is to consider whether the group’s systemof internal control is adequately designed <strong>and</strong> operating effectively torespond appropriately to the risks that are significant to <strong>BP</strong>.• Approval hierarchy, whereby proved reserves changes above certainthreshold volumes require central authorization <strong>and</strong> periodic reviews. Thefrequency of review is determined according to field size <strong>and</strong> ensuresthat more than 80% of the <strong>BP</strong> proved reserves base undergoes centralreview every two years, <strong>and</strong> more than 90% is reviewed centrally everyfour years.90 <strong>BP</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Form</strong> <strong>20</strong>-F <strong>20</strong>11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!