01.12.2012 Views

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

India: The True Economic Costs of <strong>Nuclear</strong> Electricity<br />

Chapter 8<br />

In his statement before the Indian Parliament on July 29, 2005 justifying the Indian<br />

government's decision to enter into a nuclear cooperation agreement with the United States, Prime<br />

Minister Manmohan Singh stated that it would allow us access to nuclear fuel, nuclear reactors and<br />

other technologies from outside, enabling us to produce “cheap and affordable” nuclear energy<br />

which will “enable India to leapfrog its current pace of economic growth”. cdxxx<br />

In his speech while dedicating Tarapur 3&4 reactors to the nation on August 31, 2007, the<br />

Prime Minister stated that we are placing “so much importance on nuclear energy” because it is<br />

“affordable, not only in terms of its financial cost, but in terms of the cost to our environment” cdxxxi .<br />

Whether nuclear energy is environmentally friendly or not, we shall examine in a later<br />

chapter. But definitely, it is not cheap. We have discussed the worldwide costs of nuclear power in<br />

Chapter 4, where we had concluded that nuclear energy is one of the most expensive ways of<br />

generating electricity, and is definitely much more costly as compared to electricity from fossil<br />

fuels. The only way it can be competitive with conventional electricity is if it is highly subsidised<br />

by the government.<br />

The situation is the same with India too. It is the enormous hidden subsidies that nuclear<br />

energy gets that allows the Prime Minister to claim that nuclear energy is and will continue to be<br />

“cheap” and “affordable”.<br />

Even officially, nuclear electricity in India is costlier than electricity from conventional<br />

sources. <strong>Nuclear</strong> electricity in India costs between Rs. 2.70 and 2.90 a kilowatt-hour (i.e. per unit)<br />

from its reactors built since the 1990s, a price which is far higher than the cost of electricity from<br />

coal-fired plants. cdxxxii<br />

In reality, this official price has no meaning, as the subsidies given are huge.<br />

Part I: Subsidies for India's Indigenous Reactors<br />

The subsidies given by the government of India to nuclear energy are even more than the<br />

massive subsidies given by the US government discussed in Chapter 4.<br />

There is no need to give loan guarantees for nuclear reactor construction in India, as the<br />

nuclear industry is in the public sector. Apart from this implicit subsidy, which greatly reduces the<br />

capital cost of the reactor, the DAE (that is, the government of India) also gives numerous explicit<br />

subsidies to the NPCIL.<br />

The DAE subsidises the NPC in nuclear fuel price, by supplying it fuel bundles from its<br />

<strong>Nuclear</strong> Fuel Complex at much less than the cost of production. cdxxxiii It also supplies heavy water<br />

(HW) from its heavy water plants for use in NPC's CANDU reactors at subsidised rates. Most of<br />

NPC's reactors are CANDU reactors, and heavy water (HW) is a major cost component of<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!