01.12.2012 Views

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The report mentions 16 “events” in 9 countries, all of which could have snowballed into a<br />

major accident: June 18, 1988, Tihange-1 (Belgium); February 9, 1991, Mihama-2 (Japan); April 3,<br />

1991, Shearon Harris (USA); July 28, 1992, Barseback-2 (Sweden); February 7, 1993, Three Mile<br />

Island (USA); May 12, 1998, Civaux-1 (France); December 27, 1999, Blayais-2 (France); July<br />

2000, Farley (USA); March 18, 2001, Maanshan (Taiwan); August 12, 2001, Philippsburg<br />

(Germany); December 14, 2001, Brunsbüttel (Germany); March 6, 2002, Davis Besse (USA);<br />

August 29, 2002, 17 TEPCO Reactors (Japan); April 2003, Paks (Hungary); March 1, 2005,<br />

Kozloduy-5 (Bulgaria); July 25, 2006, Forsmark (Sweden).<br />

Mycle Schneider, the renowned nuclear consultant and coordinator of this study, states, “In<br />

the course of the last twenty years, the world has lived with the illusion that it is possible to make<br />

nuclear reactors safe. In reality, every day, countless incidents occur in nuclear reactors, and, since<br />

Chernobyl, catastrophe has, on several occasions, only narrowly been avoided.” clv<br />

Let us briefly discuss two of these incidents.<br />

David-Besse, 2002<br />

In recent years, the most serious episode involving a US nuclear reactor took place at the<br />

Davis-Besse plant in Ohio in 2002. The reactor came within days or weeks of a major catastrophe.<br />

To save money, the owner of the reactor, First <strong>Energy</strong>, had persuaded the NRC to delay<br />

inspection of a vital safety component. When the plant was finally shut down, safety inspectors<br />

found that corrosion had eaten away the outer six inch thick carbon steel cover of the reactor vessel.<br />

The inner lining of the reactor vessel was of 3/16 inch stainless steel, and high pressure inside the<br />

reactor vessel had caused the stainless steel lining to bulge outwards into the cavity caused by the<br />

corrosion. Fortunately, the stainless steel bent, but did not rupture. The emergency core cooling<br />

system was also not working. Had the stainless steel ruptured, the core cooling water would have<br />

leaked, and with the emergency cooling system also inoperable, it would most probably have led to<br />

a cascade of events culminating in a reactor meltdown. clvi<br />

First <strong>Energy</strong> knew about the corrosion, but in order to continue production, had delayed<br />

informing about it to the NRC. It was ordered to pay a fine of $28 million in 2004, which was<br />

barely one percent of its profits in that year. clvii<br />

Forsmark, 2006<br />

In an even more serious accident, on July 25, 2006, the Forsmark nuclear power station in<br />

Sweden came within just 2 hours of a meltdown. The Forsmark accident was caused by the failure<br />

of back-up generators following a problem with the main power supply. Without power supply, the<br />

reactor cooling system stops functioning, which can lead to sharp spike in temperature and a<br />

meltdown within just two hours. According to a former director of the plant, “it was pure luck there<br />

wasn't a meltdown”. clviii<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!