Nuclear Energy
Nuclear Energy
Nuclear Energy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Is <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Safe?<br />
Chapter 3<br />
According to President Bush, who very strongly voiced support for nuclear energy in<br />
various international meetings, nuclear energy was a “safe and clean” energy source for the future. liv<br />
His envoy to India, David Mulford, made the same claim at a function to celebrate World<br />
Environment Day in 2008. lv Echoing the Master’s Voice, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has<br />
repeatedly claimed that nuclear energy is a safe, environmental friendly and sustainable source of<br />
energy. lvi India’s top scientists and leading ‘intellectuals’ are also strongly supporting India’s push<br />
towards nuclear energy as a safe and clean source of energy. lvii<br />
From US to India, politicians and intellectuals are blithely lying about nuclear energy. They<br />
believe that if you lie frequently and with conviction, people will believe you.<br />
Even if nuclear power plants are operating normally, the entire complex cycle from uranium<br />
mining to nuclear reactors routinely emits huge quantities of extremely toxic radioactive elements<br />
into the atmosphere every year. The environmental costs of the deadly radiation emitted by these<br />
elements and its impact on human health are simply horrendous. What is infinitely more worse,<br />
since these radioactive elements will continue to emit radiation for tens of thousands of years,<br />
therefore, its effects will continue to plague the human race not just for the present, not just during<br />
our lifetime, but for thousands of generations to come – yes, we repeat, for thousands of generations<br />
to come. And if there is a major accident, and nuclear reactors are inherently prone to accidents, the<br />
consequences will be cataclysmic!<br />
As Dr. Helen Caldicott, a renowned physician and anti-nuclear activist who has worked<br />
tirelessly to expose the real threat this technology from hell poses to human survival, wrote in<br />
<strong>Nuclear</strong> Madness, her first book: “As a physician, I contend that nuclear technology threatens life<br />
on our planet with extinction. If present trends continue, the air we breathe, the food we eat, and the<br />
water we drink will soon be contaminated with enough radioactive pollutants to pose a potential<br />
health hazard far greater than any plague humanity has ever experienced.” lviii<br />
Before we discuss the radiation emitted at each stage of the nuclear fuel cycle and its<br />
consequences for the human race, we first discuss what radiation is and how it affects human health.<br />
Stable and Unstable Atoms<br />
Part I: What is Radiation?<br />
Most atoms are stable; that is, they do not undergo changes on their own. For instance, if we<br />
put an atom of Aluminum (Z lix = 27) in a bottle, seal it and open it after a million years, it would<br />
still be an atom of aluminum. Aluminum is therefore called a stable atom.<br />
However, there exist some atoms that are unstable. An unstable atom is one whose nucleus<br />
undergoes some internal change spontaneously. In this change, the nucleus emits radiation in the<br />
form of subatomic particles, or a burst of energy, or both. This emission of radiation by the unstable<br />
25