01.12.2012 Views

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Is <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Safe?<br />

Chapter 3<br />

According to President Bush, who very strongly voiced support for nuclear energy in<br />

various international meetings, nuclear energy was a “safe and clean” energy source for the future. liv<br />

His envoy to India, David Mulford, made the same claim at a function to celebrate World<br />

Environment Day in 2008. lv Echoing the Master’s Voice, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has<br />

repeatedly claimed that nuclear energy is a safe, environmental friendly and sustainable source of<br />

energy. lvi India’s top scientists and leading ‘intellectuals’ are also strongly supporting India’s push<br />

towards nuclear energy as a safe and clean source of energy. lvii<br />

From US to India, politicians and intellectuals are blithely lying about nuclear energy. They<br />

believe that if you lie frequently and with conviction, people will believe you.<br />

Even if nuclear power plants are operating normally, the entire complex cycle from uranium<br />

mining to nuclear reactors routinely emits huge quantities of extremely toxic radioactive elements<br />

into the atmosphere every year. The environmental costs of the deadly radiation emitted by these<br />

elements and its impact on human health are simply horrendous. What is infinitely more worse,<br />

since these radioactive elements will continue to emit radiation for tens of thousands of years,<br />

therefore, its effects will continue to plague the human race not just for the present, not just during<br />

our lifetime, but for thousands of generations to come – yes, we repeat, for thousands of generations<br />

to come. And if there is a major accident, and nuclear reactors are inherently prone to accidents, the<br />

consequences will be cataclysmic!<br />

As Dr. Helen Caldicott, a renowned physician and anti-nuclear activist who has worked<br />

tirelessly to expose the real threat this technology from hell poses to human survival, wrote in<br />

<strong>Nuclear</strong> Madness, her first book: “As a physician, I contend that nuclear technology threatens life<br />

on our planet with extinction. If present trends continue, the air we breathe, the food we eat, and the<br />

water we drink will soon be contaminated with enough radioactive pollutants to pose a potential<br />

health hazard far greater than any plague humanity has ever experienced.” lviii<br />

Before we discuss the radiation emitted at each stage of the nuclear fuel cycle and its<br />

consequences for the human race, we first discuss what radiation is and how it affects human health.<br />

Stable and Unstable Atoms<br />

Part I: What is Radiation?<br />

Most atoms are stable; that is, they do not undergo changes on their own. For instance, if we<br />

put an atom of Aluminum (Z lix = 27) in a bottle, seal it and open it after a million years, it would<br />

still be an atom of aluminum. Aluminum is therefore called a stable atom.<br />

However, there exist some atoms that are unstable. An unstable atom is one whose nucleus<br />

undergoes some internal change spontaneously. In this change, the nucleus emits radiation in the<br />

form of subatomic particles, or a burst of energy, or both. This emission of radiation by the unstable<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!