01.12.2012 Views

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was the Vice-President of the USA): without the security of the Price Anderson Act, “nobody’s<br />

going to invest in nuclear power plants.” ccxxxvii<br />

The way the Act works, it does not mean that the victims of a nuclear accident automatically<br />

get their health costs reimbursed. As we have mentioned in Chapter 3, the US government refused<br />

to acknowledge that there was any significant radiation release from the Three Mile Accident, told<br />

the victims that their health problems were pure imagination, and denied them any compensation.<br />

The victims had to go to court, and as normally happens when ordinary people fight giant<br />

corporations, the case went on and on, and eventually they got tired and settled out of court.<br />

A similar regime capping the maximum liability to be paid by nuclear plant operators exists<br />

in every country in the world having nuclear reactors. For instance, in countries of the European<br />

Union which are signatories to the Vienna or Paris international convention on nuclear liability, this<br />

is now at the most 700 million euros. Worse, no liability regime now in effect outside the USA<br />

provides more than $2 billion in aggregate cover, despite the large populations surrounding many of<br />

these plants. ccxxxviii<br />

4. Nationalisation of Waste Management Costs<br />

As it is, the cost of storing the highly radioactive waste generated by nuclear power plants is<br />

huge. On top of it, the very fact that this waste is intensely radioactive and is going to remain so for<br />

thousands of years leads to additional liabilities: one, the waste is bound to inevitably leak and<br />

contaminate the surrounding area, as discussed in an earlier chapter; and two: an accident or a<br />

terrorist attack at the waste storage site could have catastrophic consequences, much worse than a<br />

meltdown at a nuclear reactor. ccxxxix<br />

No private firm, howsoever big it may be, has the financial capacity to bear these risks. And<br />

so, national governments have stepped in and effectively nationalized both the financial costs and<br />

accident liability risks of waste management. Just like the insurance subsidy discussed above,<br />

without this subsidy too, it is doubtful if the nuclear power industry would have developed at all.<br />

In the US, the government through the 1982 <strong>Nuclear</strong> Waste Policy Act has taken over the<br />

entire responsibility for permanently disposing off the nuclear waste generated by nuclear power<br />

plants, in return for which pay the utilities pay an artificially low flat fee of 0.1 cents per kilowatt-<br />

hour of nuclear generated electricity. ccxl It is not known how this amount was arrived at; it is not<br />

based on actual experience as no long-term fuel disposal facilities exist anywhere in the world; but<br />

it is obvious that it is a huge underestimate, in other words, a huge subsidy. To get a rough idea of<br />

this subsidy amount, here are some statistics: as of 2009, the nuclear power companies had paid a<br />

total of $16 billion for waste disposal services ccxli ; whereas the US Department of <strong>Energy</strong> estimated<br />

that the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository was going to cost at least $96.2 billion ccxlii ; the<br />

Obama government abandoned the project in 2010 ccxliii , but by then more than $13.5 billion had<br />

already been spent on the project. ccxliv<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!