01.12.2012 Views

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Narora Accident<br />

Take the Narora accident of 1993. It has been DAE’s closest approach to a catastrophic<br />

accident. What is most worrisome about it is that the accident could have been foreseen and<br />

prevented!<br />

That's because the failure of the turbine blades was avoidable. In 1989, General Electric<br />

informed the turbine manufacturer, Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL), about a design flaw<br />

which led to cracks in similar turbines around the world and recommended design modifications.<br />

BHEL took prompt action and prepared detailed drawings for NPC, which operates the Narora<br />

reactor. However, NPC took no action till after the accident!<br />

Secondly, even after the turbine blade had failed, the accident could have been averted had<br />

best manufacturing practices been followed. By the time the Narora reactor was being<br />

manufactured, it was common understanding in the world reactor design industry that the power<br />

supply should be encased in separate fire resistant ducts. This was one of the lessons drawn from<br />

the fire at Browns Ferry in the US in 1975, and was made compulsory in the USA. Other countries<br />

also adopted this measure. However, even though Narora plant was manufactured after all these<br />

lessons had been drawn around the world, this practice was not followed for the Narora plant! As a<br />

result, following the fire in the turbine building, the electric cables too caught fire and led to a<br />

complete blackout in the plant.<br />

Repeated Mistakes<br />

The other problem with the DAE is that it does not draw lessons even after an accident has<br />

occurred, leading to repeated accidents of the same type in different reactors. This is one of the<br />

reasons for the Narora accident too. Excessive vibrations in the turbine bearings have been<br />

common in Indian reactors. At RAPS-1, in 1981-82, after repeated shutdowns, it was finally<br />

discovered that the problem was due to high vibrations of turbine bearings, and failure of turbine<br />

blades was discovered. This led to a prolonged shutdown of more than 5 months; even after this<br />

problem had apparently been fixed the reactor had to be shut down once again because of high<br />

turbine bearing temperatures. Again in 1983, high vibrations were noticed in turbine generator<br />

bearings and it was revealed that two blades in the second stage of the high pressure rotor had<br />

sheared off at the root. In 1985, the first unit of the MAPS-1was shutdown repeatedly because of<br />

high bearing vibrations in the turbine generator.<br />

Even after the Narora accident of 1993, turbine problems have continued to plague other<br />

reactors: Narora-2, RAPS-1 and Kaiga-2 have all had to suffer repeated shut downs due to high<br />

turbine bearing vibrations / high bearing temperatures. In 1995, even after repeated shutdowns to<br />

mitigate turbine problems, blades failed in the turbine of Narora-2. Not only that, despite the<br />

accident in 1993, Narora-1 too had to be shutdown repeatedly in 1995 because of high vibrations of<br />

the turbine generator bearing.<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!