Nuclear Energy
Nuclear Energy
Nuclear Energy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Narora Accident<br />
Take the Narora accident of 1993. It has been DAE’s closest approach to a catastrophic<br />
accident. What is most worrisome about it is that the accident could have been foreseen and<br />
prevented!<br />
That's because the failure of the turbine blades was avoidable. In 1989, General Electric<br />
informed the turbine manufacturer, Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL), about a design flaw<br />
which led to cracks in similar turbines around the world and recommended design modifications.<br />
BHEL took prompt action and prepared detailed drawings for NPC, which operates the Narora<br />
reactor. However, NPC took no action till after the accident!<br />
Secondly, even after the turbine blade had failed, the accident could have been averted had<br />
best manufacturing practices been followed. By the time the Narora reactor was being<br />
manufactured, it was common understanding in the world reactor design industry that the power<br />
supply should be encased in separate fire resistant ducts. This was one of the lessons drawn from<br />
the fire at Browns Ferry in the US in 1975, and was made compulsory in the USA. Other countries<br />
also adopted this measure. However, even though Narora plant was manufactured after all these<br />
lessons had been drawn around the world, this practice was not followed for the Narora plant! As a<br />
result, following the fire in the turbine building, the electric cables too caught fire and led to a<br />
complete blackout in the plant.<br />
Repeated Mistakes<br />
The other problem with the DAE is that it does not draw lessons even after an accident has<br />
occurred, leading to repeated accidents of the same type in different reactors. This is one of the<br />
reasons for the Narora accident too. Excessive vibrations in the turbine bearings have been<br />
common in Indian reactors. At RAPS-1, in 1981-82, after repeated shutdowns, it was finally<br />
discovered that the problem was due to high vibrations of turbine bearings, and failure of turbine<br />
blades was discovered. This led to a prolonged shutdown of more than 5 months; even after this<br />
problem had apparently been fixed the reactor had to be shut down once again because of high<br />
turbine bearing temperatures. Again in 1983, high vibrations were noticed in turbine generator<br />
bearings and it was revealed that two blades in the second stage of the high pressure rotor had<br />
sheared off at the root. In 1985, the first unit of the MAPS-1was shutdown repeatedly because of<br />
high bearing vibrations in the turbine generator.<br />
Even after the Narora accident of 1993, turbine problems have continued to plague other<br />
reactors: Narora-2, RAPS-1 and Kaiga-2 have all had to suffer repeated shut downs due to high<br />
turbine bearing vibrations / high bearing temperatures. In 1995, even after repeated shutdowns to<br />
mitigate turbine problems, blades failed in the turbine of Narora-2. Not only that, despite the<br />
accident in 1993, Narora-1 too had to be shutdown repeatedly in 1995 because of high vibrations of<br />
the turbine generator bearing.<br />
130