01.12.2012 Views

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

India’s <strong>Nuclear</strong> Installations: Safety and Other Issues<br />

Part I: India: <strong>Nuclear</strong> dictatorship<br />

Chapter 9<br />

The nuclear industry is notorious all over the world for suppressing information. Even then,<br />

in the US and West European countries, at least some information is officially available on the<br />

release of radioactivity into the atmosphere by uranium mines and nuclear power plants (some of<br />

which we have given in Chapter 3). In India, however, no such information is available. The nuclear<br />

authorities in India take refuge behind the draconian Atomic <strong>Energy</strong> Act of 1962 to deny all<br />

information about the state of India’s nuclear installations and the various accidents-incidents taking<br />

place in them, under the plea that all such information is “classified”, and cannot be disclosed in the<br />

interests of national security! cdlxiv Obviously, the DAE has mixed up national security with nuclear<br />

safety to cover up its safety lapses, and the Indian courts including the Supreme Court of India<br />

have gone along with its interpretation (we discuss this in greater detail in the next section). The<br />

Indian Atomic <strong>Energy</strong> Act of 1962 is so authoritarian that the DAE is not accountable even to the<br />

Parliament! cdlxv In fact, the DAE has used the Atomic <strong>Energy</strong> Act to prevent nuclear plant workers<br />

from accessing their own health records too!! cdlxvi<br />

India's nuclear establishment has become such a monolithic and autocratic entity that even<br />

when major accidents have occurred and news about the accidents have leaked out through the<br />

media to become public knowledge, even then the AEC / DAE / NPC / UCIL have refused to admit<br />

to radiation releases from their installations. A few examples:<br />

ix. On December 25, 2006, the pipeline carrying radioactive waste from the uranium mill to the<br />

tailing pond in Jadugoda (Jharkhand) burst and continued to spew toxic sludge into a creek for<br />

nine hours before the flow of the radioactive waste was shut off. Consequently, a thick layer<br />

of toxic sludge on the surface of the creek killed scores of fish, frogs, and other riparian life.<br />

The waste from the leak also reached a creek that feeds into the Subarnarekha River, seriously<br />

contaminating the water resources of the communities living hundreds of kilometers along the<br />

way. cdlxvii However, all that the UCIL website admits is: “The pipe burst spilling tailing slurry<br />

in December 2006 … was attended in the shortest possible time and corrective measures were<br />

also taken.” cdlxviii That's all, not a word more!<br />

x. A major mishap in Tarapur in 1980 resulted in thousands of litres of irradiated water gushing<br />

out from the reactor. But the Chairman of the Atomic <strong>Energy</strong> Commission reluctantly<br />

acknowledged only a “pinhole” leak, even though the water had gushed out from a 15 cm<br />

tube! cdlxix<br />

xi. On March 26, 1999, six tons of highly radioactive heavy water leaked out from the Madras<br />

Atomic Power Plant. The accident was serious enough for the plant management to declare an<br />

emergency, which means the plant was just one step away from being evacuated. The plant<br />

authorities initially tried to suppress the news. But the workers union revealed it to the press<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!