Nuclear Energy

Recommendations

Info

clxxvi Steve Thomas, “Can nuclear power plants be built in Britain without public subsidies and guarantees?”, op. cit., p. 14. clxxvii M. V. Ramana, “Nuclear Power: Economic, Safety, Health, and Environmental Issues of Near-Term Technologies ”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2009; see also: Stephen Thomas, et al., “The Economics of Nuclear Power”, 2007, Greenpeace, http://www.greenpeace.org, p. 19. clxxviii “The New Economics of Nuclear Power”, Report of the World Nuclear Association, London, p. 7, http://www.world-nuclear.org/reference/pdf/economics.pdf clxxix Adapted from Table on Pg. 8 of the Report of the World Nuclear Association, “The New Economics of Nuclear Power”, ibid. clxxx Stephen Thomas, et al., “The Economics of Nuclear Power”, op. cit., p. 3. clxxxi Stephen Thomas has called it a Generation III design, while Mycle Schneider has called it a Generation III+ design. See: Stephen Thomas, et al., “The Economics of Nuclear Power”, ibid., p. 19; and Mycle Schneider, et al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009”, op. cit., pp. 42-43. clxxxii Stephen Thomas, et al., “The Economics of Nuclear Power”, ibid., pp. 20-21. clxxxiii Andrew Simms, et. al., “Mirage and Oasis: Energy Choices in an Age of Global Warming”, June 29, 2005, http://www.neweconomics.org clxxxiv Cited in: John Murawski, “Putting a Price on Nuclear Power”, The News & Observer, Raleigh, N.C., Feb 21, 2006, http://www.redorbit.com/news/science clxxxv “The Economic Future of Nuclear Power”, University of Chicago, August 2004, http://www.eusustel.be clxxxvi Trevor Findlay, “The Future of Nuclear Energy to 2030 and its Implications for Safety, Security and Nonproliferation”, The Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, February 2010, http://www.cigionline.org clxxxvii The levelised cost is the sum of all the costs incurred during the lifetime of the project divided by the units of energy produced during the lifetime of the project, expressed as $/kwhr. Since most of the costs or expenses as well as the sales revenue occur in a future time, one has to take the Present Value of these cash flows in one's calculations. clxxxviii “Update of the MIT 2003 Future of Nuclear Power Study”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009, http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/pdf/nuclearpower-update2009.pdf clxxxix An "overnight" cost approach is frequently used to compare prices across projects. It is the cost of a construction project if no interest was incurred during construction, as if the project was completed "overnight." cxc Mycle Schneider, et al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009”, op. cit., p. 49. cxci Mycle Schneider, et al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2007, Extended Summary”, Brussels, January 2008, Commissioned by the Greens-EFA Group in the European Parliament, p. 8, http://www.greensefa.eu cxcii Mycle Schneider, et al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2007, Extended Summary”, ibid. cxciii Cited in: Mycle Schneider et. al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009”, op. cit., p. 55. cxciv David Schlissel, et. al., “Nuclear Loan Guarantees: Another Taxpayer Bailout Ahead?”, Union of Concerned Scientists, March 2009, www.ucsusa.org cxcv Tyler Hamilton, “$26bn cost killed nuclear bid”, July 14, 2009, http://www.thestar.com cxcvi Anton Caputo, “Nuclear expansion could cost $18.2 billion”, Dec 23, 2009, http://www.mysanantonio.com; Richard W. Caperton, “Protecting Taxpayers from a Financial Meltdown”, March 8, 2010, http://www.americanprogress.org cxcvii “Experts: Three latest industry setbacks further dim nuclear 'renaissance', taxpayer-backed loan guarantees can’t fix fundamental problems with new reactors”, Dec 16, 2009, www.psr.org/nuclearbailout/nuclear4.pdf cxcviii “Olkiluoto provision could mean losses for Areva”, The Nuclear N-Former, June 24, 2010, http://www.nuclearcounterfeit.com ; same figure is cited in: “AREVA covers up extent of massive nuclear reactor cost overrun”, June 24, 2010, http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news cxcix Mycle Schneider, et al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009”, op. cit., p. 45. cc James Kanter, “In Finland, Nuclear Renaissance Runs Into Trouble”, May 28, 2009, http://www.nytimes.com cci Mycle Schneider, et al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009”, op. cit., pp. 45-46; Frank von Hippel, Editor, “The Uncertain Future of Nuclear Energy”, A research report of the International Panel on Fissile Materials, September 2010, http://www.fissilematerials.org, p. 41. ccii “AREVA covers up extent of massive nuclear reactor cost overrun”, June 24, 2010, http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news cciii “AREVA covers up extent of massive nuclear reactor cost overrun”, ibid. 186
cciv Mycle Schneider, et al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009”, op. cit., p. 46. ccv Ibid., p. 47. ccvi “Nuclear lightning strikes twice, three times…”, July 6, 2010, http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news ccvii Dan Yurman, “Areva under pressure”, July 31, 2010, http://theenergycollective.com ccviii For example, see the statement by French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, cited in Mycle Schneider, “The reality of France's aggressive nuclear power push”, June 3, 2008, http://www.thebulletin.org ccix Mycle Schneider, “The reality of France's aggressive nuclear power push”, ibid. ccx Mark Cooper, “France's Nuclear "Miracle" is More Fantasy that Fact”, Sept 23, 2010, http://thehill.com; “France's Nuclear Failures - The great illusion of nuclear energy”, Greenpeace, Nov 30, 2008, http://www.greenpeace.org ccxi Mycle Schneider, “The reality of France's aggressive nuclear power push”, op. cit. ccxii “France's Nuclear Failures - The great illusion of nuclear energy”, Greenpeace, Nov 30, 2008, http://www.greenpeace.org ccxiii Helen Caldicott, Nuclear Power is not the answer to Global Warming or anything else, Melbourne University Press, 2006, p. 32; same figure cited by Steve Thomas, “Can nuclear power plants be built in Britain without public subsidies and guarantees?”, op. cit., p. 12. ccxiv David H. Martin, “Canadian Nuclear Subsidies: Fifty Years of Futile Funding”, Campaign for Nuclear Phaseout, Jan 2003, www.cnp.ca/resources/nuclear-subsidies-at-50.pdf ccxv Mycle Schneider, et al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009”, op. cit., p. 88. ccxvi Ibid., p. 44. ccxvii David Schlissel, Michael Mullett, and Robert Alvarez, “Nuclear Loan Guarantees: Another Taxpayer Bailout Ahead?”, Union of Concerned Scientists, March 2009, http://www.scribd.com, pp. 1, 11. ccxviii Ibid., pp. 1, 11. ccxix Ibid., p. 11. ccxx Mycle Schneider, et al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009”, op. cit., p. 77; David Schlissel, Michael Mullett, and Robert Alvarez, “Nuclear Loan Guarantees: Another Taxpayer Bailout Ahead?”, ibid., pp. 12-13. ccxxi Mycle Schneider, et al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009”, ibid., pp. 76-77. ccxxii The levelised cost is the sum of all the costs incurred during the lifetime of the project divided by the units of energy produced during the lifetime of the project, expressed as $/kwhr. Since most of the costs or expenses as well as the sales revenue occur in a future time, one has to take the Present Value of these cash flows in the calculations. ccxxiii Mycle Schneider, et al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009”, op. cit., p. 73. ccxxiv Steve Thomas, “Can nuclear power plants be built in Britain without public subsidies and guarantees?”, op. cit., p. 4. ccxxv David Schlissel, Michael Mullett, and Robert Alvarez, “Nuclear Loan Guarantees: Another Taxpayer Bailout Ahead?”, op. cit., p. 2. ccxxvi “Nuclear Pork – Enough is Enough”, May 9, 2008, http://climateprogress.org ccxxvii “President Barack Obama grants loan guarantee to build new nuclear reactors in Georgia”, Feb 16, 2010, http://www.oregonlive.com ccxxviii Cited in: Mycle Schneider, et al., “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009”, op. cit., p. 56. ccxxix “Senate Currently Proposing $40 Billion to More Than $140 Billion in Subsidies for Nuclear Industry, New Analysis Finds”, Union of Concerned Scientists, July 1, 2010, http://www.ucsusa.org ccxxx Estimate by Doug Koplow, an economist and founder of Earth Track, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, which campaigns against environmentally harmful subsidies. Cited in: Diana S. Powers, “Nuclear Energy Loses Cost Advantage”, July 26, 2010, http://www.nytimes.com ccxxxi “Vogtle's new reactors to benefit not only from Georgia CWIP, but also from federal loan guarantee”, Jan 1, 2010, http://www.beyondnuclear.org; Frank von Hippel, Editor, “ The Uncertain Future of Nuclear Energy”, op. cit., p. 40. ccxxxii JJ Dooley, “U.S. Federal Investments in Energy R&D: 1961-2008”, Report prepared for US Department of Energy, Oct 2008, http://www.pnl.gov ccxxxiii Cindy Folkers, “Price-Anderson Act: Unnecessary & Irresponsible”, Oct 2001, http://www.nirs.org ccxxxiv “Price–Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act”, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org ccxxxv “Price-Anderson Act: The Billion Dollar Bailout for Nuclear Power Mishaps,” Sept 2004, http://www.citizen.org ccxxxvi Gopal Krishna, “Nuclear Liability Bill needs scrutiny”, Feb 25, 2010, http://news.rediff.com ccxxxvii Cindy Folkers, “Price-Anderson Act: Unnecessary & Irresponsible”, op. cit. 187
Page 1 and 2:
NUCLEAR ENERGY Technology From Hell
Page 3 and 4:
Introduction Part I: Government Pla
Page 5 and 6:
yet to find solution to the problem
Page 7 and 8:
Mithivirdi: A powerful movement of
Page 9 and 10:
eing proposed to be set up in the c
Page 11 and 12:
nuclear power plant accident, in ou
Page 13 and 14:
was subsequently endorsed by the he
Page 15 and 16:
Atoms are so small that they can’
Page 17 and 18:
called enriched uranium. [Note that
Page 19 and 20:
of a nuclear power reactor. A typic
Page 21 and 22:
Coolant: A liquid or gas circulatin
Page 23 and 24:
Pressurised Heavy Water Reactor Hea
Page 25 and 26:
Is Nuclear Energy Safe? Chapter 3 A
Page 27 and 28:
iii. Gamma radiation: This is akin
Page 29 and 30:
haematopoietic system). Radiation c
Page 31 and 32:
Part III: Radiation Emission in Nuc
Page 33 and 34:
The radioactivity from the tailing
Page 35 and 36:
power plant contains an amount of l
Page 37 and 38:
Tritium is a particularly scary mat
Page 39 and 40:
Plutonium cxi Named after Pluto, th
Page 41 and 42:
Firstly, reprocessing does not redu
Page 43 and 44:
sports and fishing were also banned
Page 45 and 46:
detail the impact of these 'once th
Page 47 and 48:
We today know for a fact that the n
Page 49 and 50:
Till 2005, there were at least 10,0
Page 51 and 52:
The report mentions 16 “events”
Page 53 and 54:
In an article published in The Nati
Page 55 and 56:
Even asssuming that there will not
Page 57 and 58:
fossil fuels. It has now come up wi
Page 59 and 60:
Opinion of Credit Ratings Agencies
Page 61 and 62:
it acknowledged that the expected c
Page 63 and 64:
plant owners to use much more of th
Page 65 and 66:
was the Vice-President of the USA):
Page 67 and 68:
6. Blithely Ignoring Health Costs S
Page 69 and 70:
Is Nuclear Power Green? Chapter 5 S
Page 71 and 72:
Energy Balance attempts to make an
Page 73 and 74:
nuclear energy as compared to elect
Page 75 and 76:
Table 1: Estimates of Total and Nuc
Page 77 and 78:
� At the end of 2009, there were
Page 79 and 80:
Therefore, despite all the optimism
Page 81 and 82:
1. Reviewing the Nuclear Renaissanc
Page 83 and 84:
certification also runs out in 2012
Page 85 and 86:
nuclear phase-out plans which are n
Page 87 and 88:
lower house (Bundestag) to pass a b
Page 89 and 90:
UK and French nuclear safety author
Page 91 and 92:
The second and more important reaso
Page 93 and 94:
eactor or two, but considering that
Page 95 and 96:
Pre-Independence Period India’s N
Page 97 and 98:
Secretary to the DAE. The 1958 Reso
Page 99 and 100:
The reality has been quite differen
Page 101 and 102:
Narora Uttar Pradesh PHWR 220 x 2 4
Page 103 and 104:
Background Part III: US-India Agree
Page 105 and 106:
2. New Reactors Even before the Ind
Page 107 and 108:
clearance, indicative of the fact t
Page 109 and 110:
producing electricity from these re
Page 111 and 112:
matters of negotiations”. cdxliii
Page 113 and 114:
arm of Indian big industry, had ext
Page 115 and 116:
India’s Nuclear Installations: Sa
Page 117 and 118:
extremely sensitive material used i
Page 119 and 120:
area due to uranium mining. cdlxxxi
Page 121 and 122:
women complained of fatigue, weakne
Page 123 and 124:
India: World’s most unsafe, most
Page 125 and 126:
the AEC has not instituted an award
Page 127 and 128:
The biggest deficiency in the Rajas
Page 129 and 130:
The bed of the Thane creek, which i
Page 131 and 132:
Fires have also occurred repeatedly
Page 133 and 134:
workers are exposed to radiation, a
Page 135 and 136: can't catch anything else, and ther
Page 137 and 138: up in 1971 at Kalpakkam to lead the
Page 139 and 140: Tulsunde (population 800), Janshipa
Page 141 and 142: are going to be correspondingly hig
Page 143 and 144: governing the computers and systems
Page 145 and 146: guidelines.” It’s unbelievable
Page 147 and 148: The Sustainable Alternative to Nucl
Page 149 and 150: especially bad in the rural areas,
Page 151 and 152: of the human body. In particular, t
Page 153 and 154: While the costs of large dams are h
Page 155 and 156: Demand Side Management Potential to
Page 157 and 158: such absolutely non-essential uses?
Page 159 and 160: The US has the highest installed wi
Page 161 and 162: Solar water heaters are a very simp
Page 163 and 164: Renewable Energies: Poised for a Le
Page 165 and 166: (iii) Small Hydro Power The governm
Page 167 and 168: Indian villages are spread over wid
Page 169 and 170: Energy about the huge potential of
Page 171 and 172: anticipating a change in NSG rules,
Page 173 and 174: � Privatise the public sector, in
Page 175 and 176: countries - recycling rubbish in th
Page 177 and 178: inflows of foreign capital (also kn
Page 179 and 180: analyse. We must develop our politi
Page 181 and 182: xxvii I. Semendeferi, “Legitimati
Page 183 and 184: lxxxvii Ali al-Fadhily and Dahr Jam
Page 185: cliii The IAEA maintains an interna
Page 189 and 190: cclxxi “Nuclear power: a dangerou
Page 191 and 192: cccxxxv “The postponement of the
Page 193 and 194: cdi “Uranium imports boost Indian
Page 195 and 196: cdlxix Dhirendra Sharma, India’s
Page 197 and 198: dxxxviii “Nuclear power in India
Page 199 and 200: dxciii M. V. Ramana, ibid. dxciv Mu
Page 201 and 202: dclix Union of Concerned Scientists
show all

Nuclear Energy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?