01.12.2012 Views

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Plutonium cxi<br />

Named after Pluto, the Greek God of Hell, it is supposed to be one of the most dangerous<br />

substances on earth. An alpha emitter, it is so toxic and carcinogenic that less than one-millionth of<br />

a gram if inhaled will cause lung cancer. The half ton of plutonium released from the Chernobyl<br />

meltdown is theoretically enough to kill everyone on earth with lung cancer 1,100 times if it were to<br />

be uniformly distributed into the lung of every human being.<br />

On being transported to the liver, Plutonium causes liver cancer. Because it is like iron, on<br />

inhalation, it eventually finds its way to the bone marrow to be incorporated into the hemoglobin<br />

molecule in the red blood cells. Here it irradiates bone cells to cause bone cancer and white blood<br />

cells made in the bone marrow to cause leukemia.<br />

Plutonium is also stored in the testicles, and causes mutations in reproductive genes and<br />

increases the incidence of genetic disease in future generations. The half-life of plutonium 239 is<br />

24,400 years, so it remains radioactive for half a million years. Therefore, once created, it is going<br />

to live on and enter reproductive organs and cause genetic mutations for the rest of time.<br />

As we see below, such horrendously radioactive elements are bound to find their way into<br />

the environment from wherever this nuclear waste is stored.<br />

Storing the waste<br />

Spent fuel is highly radioactive and chemically active, and intensely hot – the waste<br />

repository will be at temperatures above boiling point for 1250 years, with temperatures inside the<br />

canister holding the waste touching 662 degrees Fahrenheit. cxii There is no way of guaranteeing that<br />

any storage system designed for such waste will not corrode and leak a few hundred years from<br />

now. All attempts to build even medium term storage systems for this waste have ended in complete<br />

disasters. We look at the attempts in the US and Germany below.<br />

• The Yucca Mountain disaster<br />

All told, the nuclear reactors in the U.S. produce more than 2,000 metric tons of radioactive<br />

waste a year – and most of it ends up sitting on-site because there is nowhere else to put it. As of<br />

2008, more than 64,000 tons of dangerously radioactive waste from nuclear power reactors had<br />

accumulated in the United States. cxiii<br />

The private nuclear industry in the US has never taken responsibility of disposing off the<br />

massive quantities of radioactive waste produced by it. Obligingly, the US government passed the<br />

<strong>Nuclear</strong> Waste Policy Act in 1982, promising to take responsibility for it, and in 1987, designated<br />

the Yucca Mountain in Nevada as the primary repository for this waste. The project was envisaged<br />

as a complex of tunnels deep inside deep inside Yucca Mountain, 100 miles northwest of Las<br />

Vegas, where at least 77,000 tons of spent fuel from commercial plants, and government-generated<br />

nuclear waste, would be stored and ultimately buried. The site soon ran into huge problems; it also<br />

became clear that the site’s geology was inappropriate to contain the waste. But the DOE was<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!