01.12.2012 Views

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(i) Costs of Coal Power<br />

Even in its most renewable energy friendly scenario (where all options other than coal are<br />

pushed to their limits), the IEP projects coal based power capacity in India to rise to 270 GW by<br />

2032; while the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) projects installed capacity of coal -based plants<br />

to be 412 GW by that year. dcxvi<br />

The first problem with these projections is: where is the coal going to come from to feed<br />

these power plants? The IEP projects the requirement of coal for power generation to increase from<br />

406 Mt in 2004–05 to between 1580 and 2555 Mt (for the least and most coal intensive option<br />

respectively) in 2031–32. Since the domestic supply of coal is limited, IEP projects that high quality<br />

coal imports requirement could range from 120 million tonnes to 770 million tonnes (for the least<br />

and most coal intensive option respectively) by 2031-32. dcxvii The problem is: globally available<br />

exportable coal supplies are also running out! A recent study by the <strong>Energy</strong> Watch Group of<br />

Germany predicts that global coal production will increase over the next few years, peak around<br />

2025 and then decline. Clearly then, it is foolhardy to base our future energy security on a resource<br />

whose domestic supplies are declining and the global availability of which in adequate quantities<br />

beyond 2030 is suspect. dcxviii<br />

The second, and more important problem with this projection is: the IEP totally ignores the<br />

social, economic and environmental aspects of such a huge increase in coal based power generation.<br />

It is going to pose a bigger risk to biodiversity in the Indian subcontinent than all other<br />

anthropogenic interferences together did in the past. Each part of the entire coal cycle – from its<br />

mining, to burning of coal in power plants, to disposing of coal waste – causes irreparable damage<br />

to the environment and the health of people.<br />

Costs of coal mining<br />

The most serious health effect of coal mining is of course on the coal miners – it causes<br />

black lung disease, due to the progressive build up of coal dust in the lungs which the body is<br />

unable to remove. Apart from that, coal mining causes displacement of entire communities who are<br />

forced to abandon their homes because of the mines. The coal is normally located below thick<br />

forests, so mining causes widespread deforestation. It also generates huge waste mountains, and<br />

blankets surrounding communities with dust particles and debris.<br />

Costs of coal power plants<br />

The burning of coal in power plants to produce heat and generate electricity leaves a similar<br />

trail of destruction in its wake. A groundbreaking medical report Coal’s Assault on Human Health<br />

released in November 2009 by the renowned US group ‘Physicians for Social Responsibility’ has<br />

given in detail the devastating effects of coal burning on human health. Coal combustion releases<br />

sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, mercury, and dozens of other hazardous<br />

substances into the environment, which damage the respiratory, cardiovascular and nervous systems<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!