12.07.2015 Views

Resolution of the City of Jersey City, N.J.

Resolution of the City of Jersey City, N.J.

Resolution of the City of Jersey City, N.J.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>City</strong> Clerk File No. Res. 09-892Agenda No.lO.UApproved: OCT 2 8 2009TITLE:RESOLUTION OF THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITYDIRECTING THE JERSEY CITY PLANING BOAR TO REVIEW ARESOLUTION OF THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL DESIGNATING BLOCK 792, LOT242 AS AN ARA IN NEED OF REHAILITATIONWHEREAS, <strong>the</strong> Local Redevelopment and Housing Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-14.a., providesthat <strong>the</strong> governng body <strong>of</strong> a muncipality may, by resolution, determine that a delineated areais an area in need <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation if certin conditions are found to exist with <strong>the</strong> delineatedarea; andWHEREAS, among <strong>the</strong> conditions precedent to makng such a determnation is a finding that"more than half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> housing stock in <strong>the</strong> delineated area is at least 50 years old, or amajority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> water and sewer infastrctue in <strong>the</strong> delineated area is more than 50 years oldand in need <strong>of</strong> repair and substantial maintenance;" andWHEREAS, <strong>the</strong> Municipal Council seeks a review by, and recommendation <strong>of</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong><strong>City</strong> Planng Board, with regard to a proposed resolution <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Muncipal Councildetermining that <strong>the</strong> delineated area, known as Block 792, Lot 242 is an area in need <strong>of</strong>rehabilitation; andWHEREAS, a copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed resolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Muncipal Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong><strong>City</strong> is attched hereto for transmittl to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> <strong>City</strong> Plang Board;NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by <strong>the</strong> Muncipal Council <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong><strong>City</strong> that <strong>the</strong> proposed resolution entitled "<strong>Resolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Muncipal Council <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Jersey</strong> <strong>City</strong> Designating Block 792, Lot 242 as an Area in Need <strong>of</strong>Rehabilitation" be, andhereby is submitted to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> <strong>City</strong> Plang Board for its review and recommendations,including any modifications which may be recommended.~~Robert D. Cotter, PP, AICPPlang DirectorAPPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:=.,'--eOfI'Br:;1 -Certification Required 0Not equi R 'red 0APPROVED q.ORECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE ON FINAL PASSAGE 10/28/09COUNCILPERSON AYE NAY N.V. COUNCILPERSON ; AYE NAY N.V. COUNCILPERSON AYE NAY N.V.sonOLANO I GAUGHAN / BRENNAN 7'DONNElLY ./ FULOP ./ FLOOD ./I ./ LOPEZ RICHARDSON v' VEGA' ./N.V. -Not Voting (Abstain)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!