12.07.2015 Views

Methods in Anopheles Research - MR4

Methods in Anopheles Research - MR4

Methods in Anopheles Research - MR4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2 : <strong>Anopheles</strong> Laboratory Biology and Culture2.3 Modify<strong>in</strong>g Fecundity, Longevity and Size v2Page 1 of 62.3 Modify<strong>in</strong>g Fecundity, Longevity and SizePaul Howell and Liz Wilk<strong>in</strong>sIntroductionMa<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g proper nutrition throughout larval development will have positive effects for the entirety of amosquito’s life. Optimization of nutrition, photoperiod, competition, and temperature will result <strong>in</strong> healthierlarvae and a more productive colony. If any of these is suboptimal, smaller and generally less vigorousmosquitoes will result. Large size has been often associated with <strong>in</strong>creased fecundity and longevity <strong>in</strong>many different species (Blackmore and Lord 2000, Briegel 1990, and Takken et al. 1998). Here wepresent some general <strong>in</strong>formation to assist <strong>in</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g rear<strong>in</strong>g protocols for anophel<strong>in</strong>e mosquitoes.Larval Diet and NutritionIncreased fecundity and longevity result partly from reserves accumulated dur<strong>in</strong>g immature stages.Several factors can reduce these reserves and result <strong>in</strong> poor quality adults. Some studies <strong>in</strong>dicate thatdiets high <strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> are superior <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g larger, more fecund mosquitoes. Increases <strong>in</strong> egg clutchsize have been positively associated with high prote<strong>in</strong> diets (Akoh et al. 1992, Lang 1978). Conversely,sub-optimal diets resulted <strong>in</strong> the production of smaller adults which were less likely to seek out a bloodmeal (Klowden et al. 1988). A high prote<strong>in</strong> diet also reduced immature development times <strong>in</strong>Toxorhynchites splendens (Amalraj et al. 2005). Therefore the quality of the diet can have significanteffects on colony production and growth.Not only is the quality of diet fed to larvae important, but the quantity is also significant. Reisen et al.(1984) illustrated the relationship between the concentration of food and larval development to pupation.Overfeed<strong>in</strong>g larvae will often lead to high larval mortality (Reisen 1975). However, the surviv<strong>in</strong>g larvae willdevelop rapidly and result <strong>in</strong> large adults (Lillie and Nakasone 1982; Reisen et al. 1984). Conversely,underfed larvae will result <strong>in</strong> the production of smaller adults. In Cx. pipiens fatigans, underfeed<strong>in</strong>g leadsto a reduction <strong>in</strong> the number of ovarian follicles (Ikeshoji 1965; Arrivillaga and Barrera 2004). Therefore,measured amounts of a larval diet should be supplied to ensure optimal growth and fecundity.Dietary Restriction (DR) has been studied for its effect on longevity extensively <strong>in</strong> flies and mice. Thoughthe results are not completely <strong>in</strong> agreement, the general conclusions are compatible. By and large, <strong>in</strong>animals and <strong>in</strong>sects, one of the most successful ways to extend longevity is through DR (Burger andPromislow 2004). For many species of animals, restrict<strong>in</strong>g diets yields animals that are leaner and have<strong>in</strong>creased longevity (Hopk<strong>in</strong> 2003). These same animals, however, are typically less fertile and become<strong>in</strong>fected or sick more easily. DR animals are much slower than their better-fed counterparts (Hopk<strong>in</strong>2003). DR-affected animals live longer but show signs of age much more quickly (Hopk<strong>in</strong> 2003; Burgerand Promislow 2004). Longevity benefits are easily reversed with the <strong>in</strong>troduction of any stressors to theenvironment as the DR animals are extraord<strong>in</strong>arily susceptible, especially to <strong>in</strong>fection and sickness. Inthose cases, the better nourished animals will have the greater longevity (Hopk<strong>in</strong> 2003). A balanced dietat the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of life has the greatest benefit on overall lifetime longevity (Rasnitsyn and Yasyukevich1988; McCay et al. 1989).In flies, DR <strong>in</strong>creased the life span of all females <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g fertile or sterile flies. Dietary manipulationgenerally has a greater and longer effect on females than males, though <strong>in</strong> a few studies, the opposite istrue (Burger and Promislow 2004).Alternately, it has also been reported that <strong>in</strong> some animals, the quality of the diet is the more importantfactor <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased growth and longevity than the amount (McCay et al. 1989). Most generally, <strong>in</strong> the wild,reproduction and speed are the most important elements for survival, and both are severely h<strong>in</strong>dered byDR (Hopk<strong>in</strong> 2003). So, for a wild animal or <strong>in</strong>sect, the best bet for reproduction and evasion of predatorsis to be big and fat (Hopk<strong>in</strong> 2003)!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!