12.07.2015 Views

Riddle of America, The - Waldorf Research Institute

Riddle of America, The - Waldorf Research Institute

Riddle of America, The - Waldorf Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a mess. Otherwise, there is pure harmony, an easy give-and-take, and thepainting comes out well.”For the observer, too, Pollock’s large-scale paintings tend to beexperienced more as environment than isolated object. <strong>The</strong> viewer is lessdetached from such a painting than from a more traditional artwork. Viewersrelate their impressions <strong>of</strong> his paintings to a wide range <strong>of</strong> phenomena:the <strong>America</strong>n landscape, New York City, the night sky, atomic energy, jazzmusic, <strong>America</strong>n transcendentalist ideas, existentialist ideas <strong>of</strong> risk andchance. Freed from the traditional functions <strong>of</strong> drawing, Pollock’s line trajectsfreely as an autonomous element, building an expansive web <strong>of</strong> forcessuspended in front <strong>of</strong> the canvas, seeming to project a sense <strong>of</strong> space outfrom the picture surface. Throughout each picture, there is a continual tensionbetween picture surface and the dissolving marks, between the frontalplane and receding space, between wall and veil. Greenburg comments thatthe picture surface <strong>of</strong> Pollock’s paintings seems to open up from the rear.Actually, it is the quality <strong>of</strong> flatness <strong>of</strong> the picture surface, not that materialsurface itself, that becomes dissolved by an element <strong>of</strong> pictorial illusion—avery subtle experience where the difference was indistinguishable betweenthe literalness <strong>of</strong> surface and the illusionistic “spatial” presence <strong>of</strong> the paintingconveyed through how the paint was applied.<strong>The</strong> most emulated and influential painter during the 1950s, Willemde Kooning (1904–1997), had studied art for eight years in his nativeHolland before moving to New York City in 1926. His later reputation waslargely based on his masterful syntheses <strong>of</strong> intense personal expressionwith a certain pictorial finesse and virtuoso handling <strong>of</strong> paint, or, in terms<strong>of</strong> formal innovation, on his combination <strong>of</strong> traditional figural subjects withan energetically structural but flat surface. De Kooning later admitted thathe was <strong>of</strong>ten jealous <strong>of</strong> Pollock, who told him, “You know more, but I feelmore.” His painting was strongly influenced by Pollock’s allover, drippedpaintstyle, but de Kooning also felt himself linked to the Western artistictradition.In the early 1940s de Kooning began to “draw” directly with hispaint-loaded brush, applying an <strong>of</strong>ten vehemently expressive brush stroketo increasingly complex compositions that seemed to reflect the dynamic,anxious, and restless qualities <strong>of</strong> modern urban living. He allowed his raw,gestural brush strokes themselves (“color drawing”) to carry the burden <strong>of</strong>his meaning. For many critics and fellow artists, his dynamic, open-endedcanvases seemed to convey an honesty <strong>of</strong> expression and risk-taking thatgave new meaning to the creative process.127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!