12.07.2015 Views

Riddle of America, The - Waldorf Research Institute

Riddle of America, The - Waldorf Research Institute

Riddle of America, The - Waldorf Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Before I enter upon a discussion <strong>of</strong> the first two <strong>of</strong> these elements(a discussion <strong>of</strong> the third as applied to this passage will be found in a laterlecture), I wish to return to a consideration <strong>of</strong> the page as an example <strong>of</strong> theGrand Style Ornate. That it is a successful example <strong>of</strong> such a style does notmark it as a product <strong>of</strong> the New World, but that it is so in 1851 is, from thepoint <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> English literature, a matter <strong>of</strong> remark.<strong>America</strong>ns were filled with a sense <strong>of</strong> newness, <strong>of</strong> vastness, and <strong>of</strong>challenge. As Walt Whitman put it:It almost seems as if a poetry with cosmic and dynamic features <strong>of</strong>magnitude and limitlessness suitable to the human soul, were neverpossible before.And for this big feeling within them they needed to employ a grand style,a swelling rhetoric unabashed. And they needed it at the precise momentthat England lost it.England did not lose it because <strong>of</strong> any diminution <strong>of</strong> her exterior orinterior greatness. Her exterior greatness had not yet reached its peak; andher interior greatness has never been greater than in our own time. She lostit for two reasons: one, the verbal expressions for that greatness had beenunder employment so long that it had begun to show exhaustion; and, two,the islanders (as I said earlier) had dwelt so long in congested proximity thata heroic view <strong>of</strong> one another was no longer possible. <strong>The</strong> mock heroic hadbeen able to flourish side by side with the heroic in the eighteenth century,but finally it had begun to sap the heroic. British feeling in regard to all thatwas venerable in their institutions did not decline, but their expression <strong>of</strong>it became more and more an understatement in public and an affectionatepersiflage in private. Poet laureates found it increasingly difficult to celebrategreat personages and great events in the l<strong>of</strong>ty language that was calledfor. English humor <strong>of</strong> the last half <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century was preciselybased on the mocking application to daily life <strong>of</strong> the grandiose diction <strong>of</strong>the preceding centuries.But <strong>America</strong> was not overcrowded, and neither its geography norits history had been for centuries the subject <strong>of</strong> literature. <strong>The</strong> heroic flourishedside by side with the mock-heroic, and the mock-heroic itself seemedto be a smiling tribute to the heroic. All <strong>of</strong> the writers we are consideringwere highly “bookish” authors and may have been aware <strong>of</strong> the increasinghollowness <strong>of</strong> the English grand style (which accompanied an increasingprecision and beauty in the description <strong>of</strong> the homely and intimate), but201

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!