12.07.2015 Views

Riddle of America, The - Waldorf Research Institute

Riddle of America, The - Waldorf Research Institute

Riddle of America, The - Waldorf Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

insights result. In considering the social dangers <strong>of</strong> erasing a person’s individualityby highlighting the person’s sex, Steiner finds that women areparticularly liable to this kind <strong>of</strong> erasure:“A man’s activity in life is governed by his individual capacities andinclinations, whereas a woman’s is supposed to be determined solely by themere fact that she is a woman.” (p. 200)In short, women somehow have more gender and therefore lessindividuality than men!Steiner shows how crucial individuality must be as the definingconcept <strong>of</strong> humanness, but also that, ordinarily, individuality is more readilyaccorded to men than to women. Women are more <strong>of</strong>ten seen as members<strong>of</strong> the group “women” than men are seen as members <strong>of</strong> the group “men.”As a result, a woman’s gender more <strong>of</strong>ten obscures her individuality thana man’s obscures his.With the help <strong>of</strong> Steiner’s analysis <strong>of</strong> individuality, in which he opposesindividualism to stereotyping rather than to community, it becomesclear that feminism and humanism do not oppose one another. <strong>The</strong>y are notmutually exclusive; it is impossible and unnecessary to choose between them.Rather, feminism makes it possible to understand what is at stake in callingoneself a humanist in a masculinist world—nothing less than learning toaccord equal yet distinct individuality, humanness, to every woman or manwhom one meets. A feminist consciousness calls for attention to women’sindividuality despite prevalent cultural tendencies to erase it; and a spiritconsciousness recognizes that a communally responsive individuality isthe soul-spiritual core <strong>of</strong> every human being, despite widespread notionsthat human beings have no core other than their central nervous system.Is it, then, more humane to be a humanist than a feminist? No. In fact, ifSteiner’s 1894 analysis <strong>of</strong> the situation applies now, at the turn <strong>of</strong> the nextcentury—and it still seems all too accurate—one really cannot be a humanistunless one is a feminist too.Endnote1. <strong>The</strong> book has various titles in English: Philosophy <strong>of</strong> Freedom, Philosophy<strong>of</strong> Spiritual Activity, Philosophy <strong>of</strong> Freedom as Spiritual Activity, andThinking as a Spiritual Path. All are available from either Rudolf SteinerPress in Great Britain or Anthroposophic Press in the United States.Page numbers refer to the Wilson translation.305

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!