B. Christansen23. Institute of International Education (IIE) (2012). U.S. Higher Education Fairs inAsia. Retrieved November 18, 2013, from:www.iiehongkong.org/ufair/spring%202010/24. Kalender, İ. (2012). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Student Selection to HigherEducation. Journal of Higher Education, 2(1), 13-19.25. Kulik, C., & Roberson, L. (2008). Common Goals and Golden Opportunities:Evaluations of Diversity Education in Academic and Organizational Settings.Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 7, No. 3, 309-331.26. MarketsandMarkets (2012). Market Research. Retrieved from:www.marketsandmarkets.com27. McCready, C., & Tucker, C. (2011). Who Goes Where and Why?: An Overviewand Analysis of Global Educational Mobility. New York: Institute of InternationalEducation.28. McKinsey Quarterly (2010). Five forces reshaping the global economy: McKinseyGlobal Survey results. Retrieved January 23, 2014, from:www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Five_forces_reshaping_the_global_economy_McKinsey_Global_Survey_results_258129. McKinsey Global Institute (2012). Help wanted: The future of work in advancedeconomies. Retrieved January 15, 2014, from:www.mckinsey.com/Insights/MGI/Research/Labor_Markets/Future_of_work_in_advanced_economies30. Metropolitan Center for Urban Education (2008). Culturally Responsive DifferentiatedInstructional Strategies. New York: New York University.31. OECD (2010), PISA 2009 at a Glance, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264095298-en32. Ohmae, K. (2005). The Next Global Stage: The Challenges and Opportunities InOur Borderless World. Philadelphia: Wharton School of Publishing.33. Özkul, T. (2012). Jump Starting Innovation in University Education. Journal ofHigher Education, 2(1), 20-27.34. Şen, Z. (2011). Fuzzy philosophy of science and education. Turkish Journal ofFuzzy Systems, 2(2), 77-98.35. Şen, Z. (2012). Engineering science and philosophy. International Research Journalof Engineering Science, Technology and Innovation, 1(1), 14-29.36. The World Bank (2012). Labor Markets. Retrieved December 18, 2013, from:http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTSOCIALPROTECTION/EXTLM/0,,menuPK:390621~pagePK:149018~piPK:149093~theSitePK:390615,00.html37. Turkey Education: Statistical Profile (2014). NationMaster. Retrieved March 1,2014, from: http://www.nationmaster.com/countryinfo/profiles/Turkey/EducationTurkish38. Tyson, L. (2009). World economic forum. Switzerland: Davos19
Enhancing the Global Classroom for Contemporary Globalism39. United States Education: Statistical Profile (2014). NationMaster. RetrievedMarch 1, 2014, from: http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/profiles/United-States/Education40. University of Southern California (USC) (2012). FAQs: Admission Standards.Retrieved from: http://www.usc.edu/admission/undergraduate/faq/admission_standards.html41. US State Department (2014). Foreign Service Officer Qualifications – 13 Dimensions.Retrieved February 21, 2014, from:https://careers.state.gov/uploads/4c/e8/4ce8ce99d45087fc22dbd582ebab88f7/3.0.0_FSO_13_dimensions.pdfSummaryGlobalization of the 21 st century has changed economic and other realities far beyondthe expectations of most individuals; the worldwide financial meltdown of 2008serves as a particularly pervasive example. Experts in business, education, finance,government, and other fields are still working to revise various systems and infrastructuresthat will operate in a robust manner within the new realities of today. This chapterfocuses on the educational aspect of that massive effort by briefly comparing twocountries with very different cultural, economic, and geopolitical situations: Turkeyand the USA. These two nations can serve as model examples for other countries withsimilar backgrounds from which a general analysis can be derived for future discussionon educational issues. The chapter commences with an introduction to the realities ofcontemporary globalism that underscore the very purpose for this chapter, and the bodythen outlines in some detail the current systems in the two countries. There is also discussionabout the need for culturally responsive teaching (CRT) in the “global classroom”that exists today. The conclusion synthesizes the earlier discussions and providessuggestions to create a paradigm shift in thinking required for most educationalstructures. The author forwards that many papers on education do not sufficiently coverthe practical application of and reasons for educational reforms today. Therefore, itis believed this effort shall assist in rectifying the situation.20
- Page 2 and 3: VIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGEDENMARKCREATI
- Page 4: Table of contentIntroduction . . .
- Page 7 and 8: the reader toward better perception
- Page 9 and 10: Enhancing the Global Classroom for
- Page 11 and 12: Enhancing the Global Classroom for
- Page 13 and 14: Enhancing the Global Classroom for
- Page 15 and 16: Enhancing the Global Classroom for
- Page 17 and 18: Enhancing the Global Classroom for
- Page 19: Enhancing the Global Classroom for
- Page 23 and 24: Methodology of enterpreneurship tea
- Page 25 and 26: Methodology of enterpreneurship tea
- Page 27 and 28: Methodology of enterpreneurship tea
- Page 29 and 30: Methodology of enterpreneurship tea
- Page 31 and 32: Methodology of enterpreneurship tea
- Page 33 and 34: Methodology of enterpreneurship tea
- Page 35 and 36: Methodology of enterpreneurship tea
- Page 38 and 39: CREATING ENTREPRENEURIAL MINDSETCHA
- Page 40 and 41: A. Ziółkowski, K.Ziółkowskidedi
- Page 42 and 43: A. Ziółkowski, K.ZiółkowskiThe
- Page 44 and 45: A. Ziółkowski, K.ZiółkowskiFig.
- Page 46 and 47: A. Ziółkowski, K.ZiółkowskiFig
- Page 48: 9. ReferencesA. Ziółkowski, K.Zi
- Page 51 and 52: Design of a learning process for SM
- Page 53 and 54: Design of a learning process for SM
- Page 55 and 56: Design of a learning process for SM
- Page 57 and 58: Design of a learning process for SM
- Page 59 and 60: Design of a learning process for SM
- Page 62 and 63: CREATING ENTREPRENEURIAL MINDSETCHA
- Page 64 and 65: T. KurbanowOERs are Massive Open On
- Page 66 and 67: T. Kurbanowdictionaries, word lists
- Page 68 and 69: T. KurbanowDoctor's Degree (28%). 5
- Page 70 and 71:
T. KurbanowFig. 3. Categorization o
- Page 72 and 73:
T. KurbanowThe next question was re
- Page 74 and 75:
T. KurbanowFig. 8. Services and sof
- Page 76 and 77:
T. Kurbanownation may rest in the v
- Page 78 and 79:
T. Kurbanow2. Britt A.M., & Gabrys
- Page 80 and 81:
CREATING ENTREPRENEURIAL MINDSETCHA
- Page 82 and 83:
V. Marcinovátime, tomorrow each pe
- Page 84 and 85:
V. MarcinováIt is difficult to qua
- Page 86 and 87:
V. Marcinovádevelopment. It is evi
- Page 88 and 89:
V. Marcinováincreases the rate of
- Page 90 and 91:
V. Marcinovámaking perspective. Hu
- Page 92 and 93:
CREATING ENTREPRENEURIAL MINDSETCHA
- Page 94 and 95:
J. Czerna-Grygielate an organizatio
- Page 96 and 97:
J. Czerna-GrygielMillward Brown SMG
- Page 98 and 99:
J. Czerna-GrygielEducation continui
- Page 100 and 101:
J. Czerna-Grygielis the implementat
- Page 102 and 103:
J. Czerna-GrygielResearch conducted
- Page 104 and 105:
CREATING ENTREPRENEURIAL MINDSETCHA
- Page 106 and 107:
H. KrukOther principles connected w
- Page 108 and 109:
H. Kruk2014/2015 while some for pre
- Page 110 and 111:
H. Krukin programmes in economics f
- Page 112 and 113:
H. Krukplaces”, “Fuel and energ
- Page 114 and 115:
H. Krukuniversities of technology a
- Page 116 and 117:
CREATING ENTREPRENEURIAL MINDSETCHA
- Page 118 and 119:
S.BadowskaWith this approach, resea
- Page 120 and 121:
4. Results and discussionS.Badowska
- Page 122 and 123:
S.Badowskaown professional interest
- Page 124 and 125:
S.BadowskaAn academics’ propensit
- Page 126 and 127:
S.Badowskaacademic staff will spend
- Page 128 and 129:
S.BadowskaSecondly, tested research
- Page 130 and 131:
S.Badowska13. Kruss G. (2012). Reco
- Page 132 and 133:
AbstractsAbstractsChapter 1. Bryan
- Page 134 and 135:
Abstractstransfer a certain body of
- Page 136 and 137:
Abstractsinclude courses concerning