13.07.2015 Views

Dissertation - Michael Becker

Dissertation - Michael Becker

Dissertation - Michael Becker

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that forbids clusters of alveolar stops, like [dt] and [dd], regular verbs resolve the clusterby epenthesis, and verbs that stay unchanged in the past resolve the cluster by deletionor fusion. Verbs that don’t end in [d] or [t] don’t violate the constraint on alveolar stopclusters, and thus have no reason to stay unchanged in the past.The tableau in (1) shows the derivation of the verb [gaId] (guide). The first candidatein (1) is the winner, with an epenthetic vowel and hence a violation of DEP. The secondcandidate is zero-marked (i.e. it sounds identical to the root) by virtue of deleting the affixal[d], thus violating MAX 2 . The final candidate is the faithful one, which violates a constrainton clusters of alveolar stops (*DD, see also Borowsky 1987), which is undominated inEnglish.(1)/gaId + d/ *DD MAX DEPa. ☞ gaIdId *b. gaId *!c. gaIdd *!The derivation of the zero-marked verb [sprEd] (spread) is shown in (2). In order tomake the zero-marked form the winner, DEP must dominate MAX, which is the oppositeof the ranking required by guide.2 Alternatively, zero-marked verbs avoid a violation of *DD by fusing the root [t] or [d] and the suffixal[d], violating UNIFORMITY.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!