13.07.2015 Views

Dissertation - Michael Becker

Dissertation - Michael Becker

Dissertation - Michael Becker

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(192) a. /nat^+ [−ant] 1l/ → [naÙ h 1l], [naÃ1l]requires MAX(float) ≫ IDENT(ant)b. /nat^+ [−ant] 1l/ → [nat h 1l], [nad1l]requires IDENT(ant) ≫ MAX(float)When *TI is highly ranked, and a coronal fricative surfaces before the accusative suffix,Korean won’t allow the floating [−anterior] to surface faithfully, because the language asa whole is not faithful to [anterior] on fricatives. This is ensured by the high-rankingconstraint *S, which in turn is dominated by *si, making [S] surface before [i] and [s] surfaceelsewhere. Since the high-ranking *S makes either ranking of IDENT(ant) and MAX(float)compatible with the winner, no items that surface with [s] in the accusative will be listedwith clones of IDENT(ant).(193) /nat^+ [−ant] 1l/ → [nas1l]requires *S ≫ IDENT(ant), MAX(float)Since the learn has conflicting evidence about the ranking of IDENT(ant), they willclone it. Among the nouns that surface with a stop in the accusative, 61% are predicted tosurface as [Ù h ] or [Ã] rather than as [t h ] or [d].(194) *S ≫ IDENT(ant) {113+1 items} ≫ MAX(float) ≫ IDENT(ant) {160+17 items}After the addition of the floating [−anterior] to the UR of the accusative suffix, thelearner can account for all the mappings that they observe, and they can correctly learn theproportion of each of the five stem-final coronals in the language. The preferences that thegrammar makes are given in (195), showing that the grammar successfully replicates thelexical counts given in (183).201

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!