13.07.2015 Views

Dissertation - Michael Becker

Dissertation - Michael Becker

Dissertation - Michael Becker

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

following a (non-high) long vowel or a diphthong and least common after the short nonhighvowels. The high vowels, which in Dutch are phonetically short and don’t have longcounterparts, give rise to a rate of voicing alternation that is intermediate between the longvowels and the non-high short vowels. Vowel length, however, is a rather poor predictor ofconsonant voicing in the lexicon: In the GLM statistical analysis that Ernestus & Baayen(2003) report, vowel length has a very modest effect on the voicing of the followingobstruent (p = .053). A comparison of long vowels and high vowels only shows a morerobust effect (p = .017).In the experimental results, the vowel effect was solid (p = .004). Long vowels weresignificantly more conducive to voicing of stem-final obstruents than short vowels of anyheight. There was no significant difference between the short high and short non-highvowels.It is instructive that Dutch speakers imposed a natural trend on the data: The differentvowel qualities of Dutch were abstracted away from, since universally, vowel quality(height, backness, tenseness, roundness) has no power to affect the voicing of a followingconsonant. Only vowel length is universally correlated with voicing, with long vowels(either pure or diphthongal) being conducive to following voiced codas and short vowels tofollowing voiceless codas (Lisker & Abramson 1964; Ohala 1983; Volatis & Miller 1992).Given a family of universal constraints such as {*V:p] σ , *V:t] σ , *V:k] σ }, whichpenalizes voiceless coda obstruents after a long vowel, and the more general family {*b] σ ,*d] σ , *g] σ }, speakers will be able to keep track of alternation rates of obstruents that followlong vowels separately from the alternation rates of obstruents after short vowels.Inthe experiment that Ernestus & Baayen (2003) report, speakers were given bare verbalroots (e.g. de:p), and were asked to add the past tense suffix, which is [-d@] or [-t@].When choosing between the two possible outcomes, [de:p-t@] and [de:b-d@], the root-finalconsonant is guaranteed to be in the coda, and thus its voicing is expected to interact withthe length of the preceding vowel.210

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!