03.12.2012 Views

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Percolation and Disordered Systems 255<br />

It follows that π(p0) ≥ x0, yielding θ(p0) > 0. Therefore pc ≤ p0, as required<br />

in (11.5).<br />

The proof that θ(pc) > 0 is more delicate; see [113]. �<br />

Consider now the more general setting in which the random step involves<br />

replacing a typical square of side-length M −k by a M ×M grid of subsquares<br />

of common side-length M −(k+1) (the above concerns the case M = 3). For<br />

general M, a version of the above argument yields that the corresponding<br />

critical probability pc(M) satisfies pc(M) ≥ M −2 and also<br />

(11.10) pc(M) < 1 if M ≥ 3.<br />

When M = 2, we need a special argument in order to obtain that pc(2) < 1,<br />

and this may be achieved by using the following coupling of the cases M = 2<br />

and M = 4 (see [91, 113]). Divide C0 into a 4 × 4 grid and do as follows. At<br />

the first stage, with probability p we retain all four squares in the top left<br />

corner; we do similarly for the three batches of four squares in each of the<br />

other three corners of C0. Now for the second stage: examine each subsquare<br />

of side-length 1<br />

4 so far retained, and delete such a subsquare with probability p<br />

(different subsquares being treated independently). Note that the probability<br />

measure at the first stage dominates (stochastically) product measure with<br />

intensity π so long as (1−π) 4 ≥ 1−p. Choose π to satisfy equality here. The<br />

composite construction outlined above dominates (stochastically) a single<br />

step of a 4 × 4 random fractal with parameter pπ = p � 1 − (1 − p) 1 �<br />

4 , which<br />

implies that<br />

and therefore pc(2) < 1 by (11.10).<br />

11.3 A Morphology<br />

pc(2) � 1 − (1 − pc(2)) 1 �<br />

4 ≤ pc(4)<br />

Random fractals have many phases, of which the existence of left-right crossings<br />

characterises only one. A weaker property than the existence of crossings<br />

is that the projection of C onto the x-axis is the whole interval [0, 1]. Projections<br />

of random fractals are of independent interest (see, for example, the<br />

‘digital sundial’ theorem of [131]). Dekking and Meester [113] have cast such<br />

properties within a more general morphology.<br />

We write C for a random fractal in [0, 1] 2 (such as that presented in<br />

Section 11.1). The projection of C is denoted as<br />

πC = {x ∈ R : (x, y) ∈ C for some y},<br />

and λ denotes Lebesgue measure. We say that C lies in one of the following<br />

phases if it has the stated property. A set is said to percolate if it contains a<br />

left-right crossing of [0, 1] 2 ; dimension is denoted by ‘dim’.<br />

I. C = ∅ a.s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!