PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT
PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT
PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
180 <strong>Geoffrey</strong> Grimmett<br />
so that<br />
(3.10)<br />
1<br />
gp(n) g′ p(n) = 1<br />
p Ep<br />
� �<br />
N(An) | An .<br />
Let 0 ≤ α < β ≤ 1, and integrate (3.10) from p = α to p = β to obtain<br />
(3.11)<br />
gα(n) = gβ(n)exp<br />
≤ gβ(n)exp<br />
�<br />
�<br />
−<br />
−<br />
� β<br />
α<br />
� β<br />
α<br />
1<br />
p Ep<br />
�<br />
� �<br />
N(An) | An dp<br />
� �<br />
Ep N(An) | An dp<br />
� �<br />
as in (2.30). We need now to show that Ep N(An) | An grows roughly<br />
linearly in n when p < pc, and then this inequality will yield an upper bound<br />
for gα(n) of the form required in �(3.5). The vast � majority of the work in the<br />
proof is devoted to estimating Ep N(An) | An , and the argument is roughly<br />
as follows. If p < pc then Pp(An) → 0 as n → ∞, so that for large n we<br />
are conditioning on an event of small probability. If An occurs, ‘but only<br />
just’, then the connections between the origin and ∂S(n) must be sparse;<br />
indeed, there must exist many open edges in S(n) which are crucial for the<br />
occurrence of An (see Figure 3.1). It is plausible that the number of such<br />
pivotal edges in paths from the origin to ∂S(2n) is approximately twice the<br />
number of such edges in paths to ∂S(n), since these sparse paths have to<br />
traverse twice the distance. Thus the number N(An) of edges pivotal for An<br />
should grow linearly in n.<br />
Suppose that the event An occurs, and denote by e1, e2, . . . , eN the (random)<br />
edges which are pivotal for An. Since An is increasing, each ej has the<br />
property that An occurs if and only if ej is open; thus all open paths from<br />
the origin to ∂S(n) traverse ej, for every j (see Figure 3.1). Let π be such an<br />
open path; we assume that the edges e1, e2, . . . , eN have been enumerated in<br />
the order in which they are traversed by π. A glance at Figure 3.1 confirms<br />
that this ordering is independent of the choice of π. We denote by xi the<br />
endvertex of ei encountered first by π, and by yi the other endvertex of ei.<br />
We observe that there exist at least two edge-disjoint open paths joining 0<br />
to x1, since, if two such paths cannot be found then, by Menger’s theorem<br />
(Wilson 19793 , p. 126), there exists a pivotal edge in π which is encountered<br />
prior to x1, a contradiction. Similarly, for 1 ≤ i < N, there exist at least two<br />
edge-disjoint open paths joining yi to xi+1; see Figure 3.2. In the words of<br />
the discoverer of this proof, the open cluster containing the origin resembles<br />
a chain of sausages.<br />
As before, let M = max{k : Ak occurs} be the radius of the largest ball<br />
whose surface contains a vertex which is joined to the origin by an open path.<br />
We note that, if p < pc, then M has a non-defective distribution in that<br />
3 Reference [358].<br />
�<br />
,