03.12.2012 Views

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

214 <strong>Geoffrey</strong> Grimmett<br />

may be shown to be not too unreasonable, at least when d is not too large.<br />

For further discussion, see [G].<br />

We make some further points.<br />

Universality. It is believed that the numerical values of critical exponents depend<br />

only on the value of d, and are independent of the particular percolation<br />

model.<br />

Two dimensions. When d = 2, perhaps<br />

α = −2 5<br />

3 , β = 36<br />

, γ = 43<br />

18<br />

91 , δ = 5 , . . .<br />

Large dimension. When d is sufficiently large (actually, d ≥ dc) it is believed<br />

that the critical exponents are the same as those for percolation on a tree<br />

(the ‘mean-field model’), namely δ = 2, γ = 1, ν = 1 1<br />

2 , ρ = 2 , and so on<br />

(the other exponents are found to satisfy the scaling relations). Using the<br />

first hyperscaling relation, this supports the contention that dc = 6. Such<br />

statements are known to hold for d ≥ 19; see [179, 180] and Section 8.5.<br />

8.4 Rigorous Results<br />

Open challenges include to prove:<br />

• the existence of critical exponents,<br />

• universality,<br />

• the scaling relations,<br />

• the conjectured values when d = 2,<br />

• the conjectured values when d ≥ 6.<br />

Progress towards these goals has been slender, but positive. Most is known<br />

in the case of large d, see the next section. For sufficiently large d, exact<br />

values are known for many exponents, namely the values from percolation on<br />

a regular tree. When d = 2, Kesten [205, 206] has proved that, if two critical<br />

exponents exist, then certain others do also, and certain scaling relations are<br />

valid. However, the provocative case when d = 3 is fairly open terrain.<br />

Certain partial results are known in generality, yielding inequalities in situations<br />

where one expects (asymptotic) equalities. For example, it is known<br />

that β ≤ 1, if β exists (cf. (7.36)). In similar vein, we have that γ ≥ 1 and<br />

δ ≥ 2 for all d.<br />

8.5 Mean-Field Theory<br />

The expression ‘mean-field’ permits several interpretations depending on context.<br />

A narrow interpretation of the term ‘mean-field theory’ for percolation<br />

involves trees rather than lattices. For percolation on a regular tree, it is<br />

quite easy to perform exact calculations of many quantities, including the<br />

numerical values of critical exponents. That is, δ = 2, γ = 1, ν = 1 1<br />

2 , ρ = 2 ,<br />

and other exponents are given according to the scaling relations (8.2); see<br />

[G], Section 8.1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!