03.12.2012 Views

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

156 <strong>Geoffrey</strong> Grimmett<br />

3.1 Percolation Probability<br />

3. PHASE TRANSITION<br />

One of the principal objects of study is the percolation probability<br />

(3.1) θ(p) = Pp(0 ↔ ∞),<br />

or alternatively θ(p) = Pp(|C| = ∞) where C = C(0) is, as usual, the open<br />

cluster at the origin. The event {0 ↔ ∞} is increasing, and therefore θ is<br />

non-decreasing (using (2.4)), and it is natural to define the critical probability<br />

pc = pc(L d ) by<br />

pc = sup{p : θ(p) = 0}.<br />

See Figure 1.1 for a sketch of the function θ.<br />

3.2 Existence of Phase Transition<br />

It is easy to show that pc(L) = 1, and therefore the case d = 1 is of limited<br />

interest from this point of view.<br />

Theorem 3.2. If d ≥ 2 then 0 < pc(L d ) < 1.<br />

(3.3)<br />

Actually we shall prove that<br />

1<br />

µ(d) ≤ pc(L d ) ≤ 1 − 1<br />

µ(2)<br />

where µ(d) is the connective constant of L d .<br />

for d ≥ 2<br />

Proof. Since L d may be embedded in L d+1 , it is ‘obvious’ that pc(L d ) is nonincreasing<br />

in d (actually it is strictly decreasing). Therefore we need only to<br />

show that<br />

(3.4)<br />

(3.5)<br />

pc(L d ) > 0 for all d ≥ 2,<br />

pc(L 2 ) < 1.<br />

The proof of (3.4) is by a standard ‘path counting’ argument. Let N(n)<br />

be the number of open paths of length n starting at the origin. The number<br />

of such paths cannot exceed a theoretical upper bound of 2d(2d − 1) n−1 .<br />

Therefore<br />

� � � �<br />

θ(p) ≤ Pp N(n) ≥ 1 ≤ Ep N(n)<br />

≤ 2d(2d − 1) n−1 p n

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!