PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT
PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT
PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
272 <strong>Geoffrey</strong> Grimmett<br />
which, via Lemma 13.22, implies as in (13.25) that<br />
φs,q(Hi) ≥<br />
D(log n)2<br />
(log log n) ∆4<br />
for some D > 0. By (13.28), and the fact that K = ⌊n/m⌋,<br />
φs,q(Fn) ≥<br />
D ′ n<br />
(log log n) ∆4<br />
for some D ′ > 0. By (13.24),<br />
�<br />
c5n<br />
φr,q(An) ≤ exp −<br />
(loglog n) ∆4<br />
Since ∆4 > 1, this implies the claim of the theorem with k = 1. The claim<br />
for general k requires k − 1 further iterations of the argument.<br />
(b) We omit the proof of this part. The fundamental argument is taken from<br />
[138], and the details are presented in [167]. �<br />
13.5 The Case of Two Dimensions<br />
In this section we consider the case of random-cluster measures on the square<br />
lattice L 2 . Such measures have a property of self-duality which generalises<br />
that of bond percolation. We begin by describing this duality.<br />
Let G = (V, E) be a plane graph with planar dual G d = (V d , E d ). Any<br />
configuration ω ∈ ΩE gives rise to a dual configuration ω d ∈ Ω E d defined as<br />
follows. If e (∈ E) is crossed by the dual edge e d (∈ E d ), we define ω d (e d ) =<br />
1−ω(e). As usual, η(ω) denotes the set {e : ω(e) = 1} of edges which are open<br />
in ω. By drawing a picture, one may be convinced that every face of (V, η(ω))<br />
contains a unique component of (V d , η(ω d )), and therefore the number f(ω)<br />
of faces (including the infinite face) of (V, η(ω)) satisfies f(ω) = k(ω d ). See<br />
Figure 13.1. (Note that this definition of the dual configuration differs slightly<br />
from that used earlier for two-dimensional percolation.)<br />
The random-cluster measure on G is given by<br />
Using Euler’s formula,<br />
φG,p,q(ω) ∝<br />
�<br />
.<br />
� � |η(ω)|<br />
p<br />
q<br />
1 − p<br />
k(ω) .<br />
k(ω) = |V | − |η(ω)| + f(ω) − 1,<br />
and the facts that f(ω) = k(ω d ) and |η(ω)| + |η(ω d )| = |E|, we have that<br />
φG,p,q(ω) ∝<br />
� q(1 − p)<br />
p<br />
� |η(ω d )|<br />
q k(ωd ) ,