03.12.2012 Views

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

208 <strong>Geoffrey</strong> Grimmett<br />

Fig. 7.9. The central seed is B(m), and the connections represent (p+η)-open paths<br />

joining seeds within the site-boxes.<br />

is at least 1<br />

2 (1 + pc(F, site)), and every edge in the ensuing construction is<br />

(p + η)-open. See Figure 7.8.<br />

Two details arise at this and subsequent stages, each associated with<br />

‘steering’. First, if b3 = (α1, α2, α3) we concentrate on the quadrant Tα(n)<br />

of ∂B(n) defined as the set of x ∈ ∂B(n) for which xjαj ≤ 0 for j = 2, 3 (so<br />

that xj has the opposite sign to αj). Having found such a Tα(n), we define<br />

T ∗ α(m, n) accordingly, and look for paths from b3 + B(m) to b3 + T ∗ α(m, n).<br />

This mechanism guarantees that any variation in b3 from the first coordinate<br />

axis is (at least partly) compensated for at the next step.<br />

A further detail arises when branching out from the seed b ∗ +B(m) reached<br />

inside 4Ne1+B(N). In finding seeds lying in the new half-way boxes abutting<br />

4Ne1+B(N), we ‘steer away from the inlet branch’, by examining seeds lying<br />

on the surface of b ∗ + B(n) with the property that the first coordinates of<br />

their vertices are not less than that of b ∗ . This process guarantees that these<br />

seeds have not been examined previously.<br />

We now continue to apply the algorithm presented before Lemma 7.24.<br />

At each stage, the chance of success exceeds γ = 1<br />

2 (1 + pc(F, site)). Since<br />

γ > pc(F, site), we have from Lemma 7.24 that there is a strictly positive<br />

probability that the ultimate set of occupied vertices of F (i.e., renormalised<br />

blocks of L 3 ) is infinite. Now, on this event, there must exist an infinite<br />

(p + η)-open path of L 3 corresponding to the enlargement of F. This infinite<br />

open path must lie within the enlarged set 4NF + B(2N), implying that<br />

pc + η ≥ pc(4NF + B(2N)), as required for Theorem 7.9. See Figure 7.9.<br />

The proof is complete. �

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!