03.12.2012 Views

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

PERCOLATION AND DISORDERED SYSTEMS Geoffrey GRIMMETT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

192 <strong>Geoffrey</strong> Grimmett<br />

Fig. 7.1. Take a box B which intersects at least three distinct infinite open clusters,<br />

and then alter the configuration inside B in order to create a configuration in which<br />

0 is a trifurcation.<br />

least three distinct infinite clusters with probability at least 1<br />

2 . By changing<br />

the configuration inside B(n), we may turn the origin into a trifurcation (see<br />

Figure 7.1). The corresponding set of configurations has strictly positive<br />

probability, so that Pp(T0) > 0 in (7.4).<br />

Before turning to the geometry, we present a lemma concerning partitions.<br />

Let Y be a finite set with |Y | ≥ 3, and define a 3-partition Π = {P1, P2, P3}<br />

of Y to be a partition of Y into exactly three non-empty sets P1, P2, P3.<br />

}, we say that Π<br />

For 3-partitions Π = {P1, P2, P3} and Π ′ = {P ′ 1 , P ′ 2 , P ′ 3<br />

and Π ′ are compatible if there exists an ordering of their elements such that<br />

P1 ⊇ P ′ 2 ∪ P ′ 3 (or, equivalently, that P ′ 1 ⊇ P2 ∪ P3). A collection P of 3partitions<br />

is compatible if each pair therein is compatible.<br />

Lemma 7.5. If P is a compatible family of distinct 3-partitions of Y , then<br />

|P| ≤ |Y | − 2.<br />

Proof. There are several ways of doing this; see [82]. For any set Q of distinct<br />

compatible 3-partitions of Y , we define an equivalence relation ∼ on Y by<br />

x ∼ y if, for all Π ∈ Q, x and y lie in the same element of Π. Write α(Q) for<br />

the number of equivalence classes of ∼. Now, write P = (Π1, Π2, . . . , Πm)<br />

in some order, and let αk = α(Π1, Π2, . . . , Πk). Evidently α1 = 3 and, using<br />

the compatibility of Π1 and Π2, we have that α2 ≥ 4. By comparing Πr+1<br />

with Π1, Π2, . . . , Πr in turn, and using their compatibility, one sees that<br />

α(Π1, Π2, . . . , Πr+1) ≥ α(Π1, Π2, . . . , Πr) + 1, whence αm ≥ α1 + (m − 1) =<br />

m + 2. However αm ≤ |Y |, and the claim of the lemma follows. �<br />

Let K be a connected open cluster of B(n), and write ∂K = K ∩ ∂B(n).<br />

If x (∈ B(n − 1)) is a trifurcation in K, then the removal of x induces a<br />

3-partition ΠK(x) = {P1, P2, P3} of ∂K with the properties that<br />

(a) Pi is non-empty, for i = 1, 2, 3,<br />

(b) Pi is a subset of a connected subgraph of B(n)\{x},<br />

(c) Pi � Pj in B(n), if i �= j.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!