ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World
ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World
ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
and <strong>the</strong> ECB). As a result <strong>of</strong> careful monitoringby <strong>the</strong> central banks, all related testing activitieswere completed successfully and on time for alluser communities. Between November 2007 andMay <strong>2008</strong>, procedures were in place to ensurethat those user communities which had a latermigration date (and were <strong>the</strong>refore still operatingin <strong>the</strong> first-generation TARGET system) couldinteract effectively with <strong>the</strong> user communitiesalready connected to <strong>the</strong> SSP <strong>of</strong> TARGET2. Thesix-month migration process was very smoothand did not cause any operational disruptions.TARGET OPERATIONSThe TARGET system functioned smoothlyin <strong>2008</strong> and continued to settle an increasingnumber <strong>of</strong> euro payments. The system’s marketshare was stable, with 90% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total value <strong>of</strong>payments in euro large-value payment systemsbeing executed via TARGET. The averagenumber <strong>of</strong> payments processed by <strong>the</strong> TARGETsystem each day increased by 1%, to 369,966,while <strong>the</strong> average value rose by 10%, to €2,667.On 22 December <strong>2008</strong> TARGET reacheda peak <strong>of</strong> 576,324 transactions, which is anall-time high for <strong>the</strong> system. Table 11 providesan overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> payment traffic in <strong>the</strong>TARGET system in <strong>2008</strong>, comparing it with <strong>the</strong>traffic in <strong>the</strong> previous year.The overall availability <strong>of</strong> TARGET, i.e. <strong>the</strong>extent to which participants were able to use <strong>the</strong>TARGET system during <strong>the</strong>ir business hourswithout incident, reached 99.79% in <strong>2008</strong>. It isnoteworthy that this is <strong>the</strong> highest figure since<strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> TARGET operations in 1999 andthat <strong>the</strong> migration to TARGET2 did not haveany negative effects on <strong>the</strong> system’s availability.More than 99.76% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> payments on <strong>the</strong> SSP <strong>of</strong>TARGET2 were processed within five minutes.The feedback from TARGET2 users on <strong>the</strong>system’s performance has been very positive.By December <strong>2008</strong> 900 direct participantsmaintained an RTGS account on <strong>the</strong> SSP <strong>of</strong>TARGET2. This figure is lower than <strong>the</strong> 1,072direct participants which had accounts in <strong>the</strong> firstgenerationTARGET system at <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>migration. There are two main reasons for this.Table 11 Payment traffic in TARGET 1Volume (number<strong>of</strong> transactions) 2007 <strong>2008</strong>Change(%)OverallTotal 93,375,701 94,711,380Daily average 366,179 369,966 1.03Intra-Member State 2Total 72,574,446 69,212,880Daily average 284,606 270,363 -5.00Inter-Member StateTotal 20,801,255 25,498,500Daily average 81,574 99,604 22.10Value(EUR billions) 2007 <strong>2008</strong>Change(%)OverallTotal 616,731 682,780Daily average 2,419 2,667 10.28Intra-Member State 2Total 395,412 466,572Daily average 1,551 1,823 17.54Inter-Member StateTotal 221,319 216,208Daily average 868 845 -2.69Source: ECB.1) There were 255 operating days in 2007 and 256 operatingdays in <strong>2008</strong>.2) Includes <strong>the</strong> traffic <strong>of</strong> remote participants.First, a number <strong>of</strong> credit institutions reconsidered<strong>the</strong>ir direct participation at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irmigration and opted instead to connect indirectlyvia a direct participant. Second, TARGET2created strong incentives for banks to rationalise<strong>the</strong>ir euro liquidity management and to centraliseit in fewer RTGS accounts. The overall number<strong>of</strong> banks (including branches and subsidiaries)that can be addressed worldwide throughTARGET has remained stable at some 52,000.RELATIONS WITH TARGET2 USERSDuring its development, TARGET2 benefitedgreatly from <strong>the</strong> active cooperation between <strong>the</strong>Eurosystem and <strong>the</strong> future users <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system.This considerably improved <strong>the</strong> understanding<strong>of</strong> market requirements and was instrumental inensuring a smooth migration process and highlevels <strong>of</strong> acceptance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system by <strong>the</strong> users.This cooperation continued beyond <strong>the</strong>migration phase. The Eurosystem maintainsclose relations with TARGET2 users andregular meetings were held between <strong>the</strong> euroECBAnnual Report<strong>2008</strong>113