13.07.2015 Views

ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World

ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World

ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and <strong>the</strong> ECB). As a result <strong>of</strong> careful monitoringby <strong>the</strong> central banks, all related testing activitieswere completed successfully and on time for alluser communities. Between November 2007 andMay <strong>2008</strong>, procedures were in place to ensurethat those user communities which had a latermigration date (and were <strong>the</strong>refore still operatingin <strong>the</strong> first-generation TARGET system) couldinteract effectively with <strong>the</strong> user communitiesalready connected to <strong>the</strong> SSP <strong>of</strong> TARGET2. Thesix-month migration process was very smoothand did not cause any operational disruptions.TARGET OPERATIONSThe TARGET system functioned smoothlyin <strong>2008</strong> and continued to settle an increasingnumber <strong>of</strong> euro payments. The system’s marketshare was stable, with 90% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total value <strong>of</strong>payments in euro large-value payment systemsbeing executed via TARGET. The averagenumber <strong>of</strong> payments processed by <strong>the</strong> TARGETsystem each day increased by 1%, to 369,966,while <strong>the</strong> average value rose by 10%, to €2,667.On 22 December <strong>2008</strong> TARGET reacheda peak <strong>of</strong> 576,324 transactions, which is anall-time high for <strong>the</strong> system. Table 11 providesan overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> payment traffic in <strong>the</strong>TARGET system in <strong>2008</strong>, comparing it with <strong>the</strong>traffic in <strong>the</strong> previous year.The overall availability <strong>of</strong> TARGET, i.e. <strong>the</strong>extent to which participants were able to use <strong>the</strong>TARGET system during <strong>the</strong>ir business hourswithout incident, reached 99.79% in <strong>2008</strong>. It isnoteworthy that this is <strong>the</strong> highest figure since<strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> TARGET operations in 1999 andthat <strong>the</strong> migration to TARGET2 did not haveany negative effects on <strong>the</strong> system’s availability.More than 99.76% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> payments on <strong>the</strong> SSP <strong>of</strong>TARGET2 were processed within five minutes.The feedback from TARGET2 users on <strong>the</strong>system’s performance has been very positive.By December <strong>2008</strong> 900 direct participantsmaintained an RTGS account on <strong>the</strong> SSP <strong>of</strong>TARGET2. This figure is lower than <strong>the</strong> 1,072direct participants which had accounts in <strong>the</strong> firstgenerationTARGET system at <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>migration. There are two main reasons for this.Table 11 Payment traffic in TARGET 1Volume (number<strong>of</strong> transactions) 2007 <strong>2008</strong>Change(%)OverallTotal 93,375,701 94,711,380Daily average 366,179 369,966 1.03Intra-Member State 2Total 72,574,446 69,212,880Daily average 284,606 270,363 -5.00Inter-Member StateTotal 20,801,255 25,498,500Daily average 81,574 99,604 22.10Value(EUR billions) 2007 <strong>2008</strong>Change(%)OverallTotal 616,731 682,780Daily average 2,419 2,667 10.28Intra-Member State 2Total 395,412 466,572Daily average 1,551 1,823 17.54Inter-Member StateTotal 221,319 216,208Daily average 868 845 -2.69Source: ECB.1) There were 255 operating days in 2007 and 256 operatingdays in <strong>2008</strong>.2) Includes <strong>the</strong> traffic <strong>of</strong> remote participants.First, a number <strong>of</strong> credit institutions reconsidered<strong>the</strong>ir direct participation at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irmigration and opted instead to connect indirectlyvia a direct participant. Second, TARGET2created strong incentives for banks to rationalise<strong>the</strong>ir euro liquidity management and to centraliseit in fewer RTGS accounts. The overall number<strong>of</strong> banks (including branches and subsidiaries)that can be addressed worldwide throughTARGET has remained stable at some 52,000.RELATIONS WITH TARGET2 USERSDuring its development, TARGET2 benefitedgreatly from <strong>the</strong> active cooperation between <strong>the</strong>Eurosystem and <strong>the</strong> future users <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system.This considerably improved <strong>the</strong> understanding<strong>of</strong> market requirements and was instrumental inensuring a smooth migration process and highlevels <strong>of</strong> acceptance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system by <strong>the</strong> users.This cooperation continued beyond <strong>the</strong>migration phase. The Eurosystem maintainsclose relations with TARGET2 users andregular meetings were held between <strong>the</strong> euroECBAnnual Report<strong>2008</strong>113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!