13.07.2015 Views

ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World

ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World

ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Estonian kroon and <strong>the</strong> Lithuanian litas couldjoin ERM II with <strong>the</strong>ir existing currency boardarrangements in place. The Latvian authoritiesdecided to maintain <strong>the</strong> exchange rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lats atits central rate against <strong>the</strong> euro with a fluctuationband <strong>of</strong> ±1%. The agreements on participationfor <strong>the</strong> countries whose currencies joinedERM II in 2004 or later (i.e. all <strong>the</strong> countrieslisted above except Denmark) are also all basedon a number <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r policy commitmentsby <strong>the</strong> respective authorities. These relate to,among o<strong>the</strong>r things, <strong>the</strong> pursuit <strong>of</strong> sound fiscalpolicies, <strong>the</strong> promotion <strong>of</strong> wage moderation andwage developments in line with productivitygrowth, <strong>the</strong> pursuit <strong>of</strong> prudent credit policiesand <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r structuralreforms.Prior to <strong>the</strong> collapse <strong>of</strong> Lehman Bro<strong>the</strong>rs inSeptember <strong>2008</strong>, money market spreads wererelatively stable in most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above-mentionedcountries, some volatility in <strong>the</strong> Latvian marketnotwithstanding. In <strong>the</strong> fourth quarter <strong>of</strong> <strong>2008</strong>,while exchange rate developments continuedto reflect <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial exchange rate regimes,<strong>the</strong> intensification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> global financial crisis,<strong>the</strong> deteriorating economic outlook, investors’concerns about external vulnerabilities in somecountries, toge<strong>the</strong>r with credit rating downgradesfor Latvia and Lithuania and decisions on <strong>the</strong>part <strong>of</strong> credit rating agencies to place Estoniaunder review for a rating downgrade, contributedto a rapid and pronounced widening <strong>of</strong> bond andmoney market spreads vis-à-vis <strong>the</strong> euro area inall ERM II countries except Slovakia. In Latvia,where <strong>the</strong> money market spread widening wasparticularly pronounced, and in Denmark, <strong>the</strong>central banks supported <strong>the</strong>ir currencies withforeign exchange intervention and by increasing<strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial interest rate spreads vis-à-vis <strong>the</strong>euro area. Against <strong>the</strong> background <strong>of</strong> a sharpdeceleration in economic activity and tensionsin <strong>the</strong> financial system, Latvia nationalisedits largest domestically owned bank and inDecember <strong>2008</strong> arranged a €7.5 billion jointinternational financial support programme. Theprogramme includes measures to stabilise <strong>the</strong>financial sector, substantial domestic economicreforms, fiscal consolidation and significantpublic wage reductions, and is based onmaintaining <strong>the</strong> current narrow-band exchangerate peg with a view to achieving Latvia’s policygoal <strong>of</strong> entering <strong>the</strong> euro area at <strong>the</strong> earliestpossible date.By contrast, <strong>the</strong> prospect <strong>of</strong> Slovakia joining <strong>the</strong>euro area appears to have shielded <strong>the</strong> Slovakkoruna from <strong>the</strong> negative impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> globalfinancial crisis. In <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> <strong>2008</strong> <strong>the</strong>koruna streng<strong>the</strong>ned considerably against <strong>the</strong>euro. On 29 May <strong>the</strong> currency’s central rate wasrevalued by 17.6472% to SKK 30.1260 against<strong>the</strong> euro. After <strong>the</strong> decision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU Council inJuly <strong>2008</strong> allowing Slovakia to adopt <strong>the</strong> euro,<strong>the</strong> Slovak koruna remained close to its newcentral rate, which was also <strong>the</strong> rate at which itwas converted to <strong>the</strong> euro when <strong>the</strong> latter wasintroduced in Slovakia on 1 January 2009.Turning to <strong>the</strong> currencies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> non-euro areaEU Member States that did not participate inERM II, developments varied considerablyacross countries (see Chart 39). Most currencieswere broadly stable in <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> <strong>2008</strong>,while some, such as <strong>the</strong> Czech koruna,Chart 39 Developments in non-ERM II EUcurrencies(daily data; index: 2 January <strong>2008</strong> = 100)140130 130120110 110100GBPSEKCZKHUF90 908080Jan. Apr. July Oct. Jan. Apr. July Oct. Jan.2007 <strong>2008</strong> 2009Source: ECB.PLNBGNRON140120100ECBAnnual Report<strong>2008</strong>91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!