ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World
ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World
ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
and <strong>the</strong> Eurosystem’s business continuityoversight expectations for systemicallyimportant payment systems. The first results<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assessment were encouraging and, at<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 2007, <strong>the</strong> TARGET2 overseersconcluded that TARGET2 was likely to fullycomply with all relevant Core Principles,provided that a number <strong>of</strong> oversight findingswere addressed by <strong>the</strong> system operator in <strong>the</strong>course <strong>of</strong> <strong>2008</strong> on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> an agreed actionplan. In November <strong>2008</strong> <strong>the</strong> system operatorprovided a report to <strong>the</strong> overseers, detailinghow <strong>the</strong> points included in <strong>the</strong> action planhad been addressed. The TARGET2 overseersreviewed <strong>the</strong> report and <strong>the</strong> actions taken by <strong>the</strong>TARGET2 operator and provided a final reporton <strong>the</strong> oversight assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TARGET2design to <strong>the</strong> decision-making bodies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ECB in March 2009. A public version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>assessment report will be made available.The TARGET2 overseers consider that <strong>the</strong>operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system has been in line wi<strong>the</strong>xpectations. Only one major incident, whichoccurred on 30 June <strong>2008</strong>, required specialattention and action on <strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TARGET2overseers. Some oversight recommendationsrelated to this incident have been discussed with<strong>the</strong> system operator and mitigation measureshave been implemented.EURO1EURO1 is a large-value payment system forcross-border and domestic transactions ineuro between banks operating in <strong>the</strong> EU. It isoperated by <strong>the</strong> clearing company <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Euro<strong>Bank</strong>ing Association, EBA CLEARING.EURO1 works on a multilateral net basis. Theend-<strong>of</strong>-day positions <strong>of</strong> EURO1 participantsare ultimately settled in central bank money via<strong>the</strong> TARGET2 system, with <strong>the</strong> ECB acting assettlement agent. Oversight activities in <strong>2008</strong>focused on, among o<strong>the</strong>r things, <strong>the</strong> migration <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> settlement <strong>of</strong> EURO1 end-<strong>of</strong>-day positionsto TARGET2 in May <strong>2008</strong>, when <strong>the</strong> previousTARGET system ceased to exist. The migration<strong>of</strong> settlement to TARGET2 was completedwithout any problems.On 7 July <strong>2008</strong> EBA CLEARING implementedtwo additional liquidity distribution windowsin EURO1 under <strong>the</strong> Flexible SettlementCapability (also referred to as <strong>the</strong> liquiditybridge), one at 1 p.m. and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r at 3.30 p.m.The liquidity bridge arrangement facilitates <strong>the</strong>processing <strong>of</strong> payments that would o<strong>the</strong>rwisebe placed on hold as a result <strong>of</strong> banks havingreached <strong>the</strong>ir debit or credit caps in EURO1.The two additional liquidity distributionwindows aim to reduce <strong>the</strong> balance kept on <strong>the</strong>EURO1 pre-settlement account in TARGET2and to maximise <strong>the</strong> recycling <strong>of</strong> pre-fundedliquidity. Their implementation received apositive assessment from <strong>the</strong> overseers fromboth a EURO1 and a TARGET2 perspective.CONTINUOUS LINKED SETTLEMENT SYSTEMThe Continuous Linked Settlement (CLS)system provides a multi-currency service for<strong>the</strong> simultaneous, i.e. payment-versus-payment(PvP), settlement with finality <strong>of</strong> paymentinstructions relating to foreign exchangetransactions. Through its PvP mechanism, CLSvirtually eliminates foreign exchange settlementrisk, i.e. <strong>the</strong> risk that one party to a foreignexchange transaction will pay <strong>the</strong> currency it hassold, but not receive <strong>the</strong> currency it has bought.CLS was launched in 2002 and initially settledforeign exchange transactions in seven majorcurrencies, including <strong>the</strong> euro. Following <strong>the</strong>approval by CLS overseers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mexican pesoand <strong>the</strong> Israeli shekel for settlement by CLS in<strong>2008</strong>, CLS now settles in 17 currencies. Inaddition, CLS settles single-currency paymenttransactions that are linked to a limited set <strong>of</strong>financial instruments, i.e. over-<strong>the</strong>-counter(OTC) transactions in credit derivatives andnon-deliverable forward 19 transactions.CLS is managed by CLS <strong>Bank</strong> International(CLS <strong>Bank</strong>), New York. CLS <strong>Bank</strong> is ownedby private sector banks and o<strong>the</strong>r financial19 Defined as “net cash settled” forward foreign exchange transactions,whereby two parties agree to enter into two notional foreignexchange transactions and settle <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> twonotional transactions in cash in an agreed currency. The currenciesspecified in <strong>the</strong> two notional foreign exchange transactions are notphysically exchanged by <strong>the</strong> parties to <strong>the</strong> non-deliverable forward.164 ECBAnnual Report<strong>2008</strong>