ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World
ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World
ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>the</strong> Financial Collateral Directive, <strong>the</strong> proposalalso includes credit claims eligible for <strong>the</strong>collateralisation <strong>of</strong> central bank credit operationsin order to facilitate <strong>the</strong>ir use throughout <strong>the</strong> EU.In its opinion, <strong>the</strong> ECB welcomed <strong>the</strong> proposaland suggested in particular that <strong>the</strong> definition<strong>of</strong> “system” should be extended i) to expresslyinclude systems established by an ECB legalact and ii) to allow <strong>the</strong> ECB to designate suchECB systems itself. The ECB also proposedthat credit claims be included in <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Financial Collateral Directive accordingto a single general definition that is not linkedto central bank eligibility, and recommendedharmonising some elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conflict <strong>of</strong>law rules on credit claims in <strong>the</strong> EU.The ECB was also consulted on a proposal fora directive amending <strong>the</strong> Capital RequirementsDirective 29 with respect to banks affiliated tocentral institutions and certain own funds items.The ECB issued an opinion 30 on a proposalfor a directive amending <strong>the</strong> E-moneyDirective 31 which aims to open up <strong>the</strong> marketfor <strong>the</strong> issuance <strong>of</strong> electronic money, throughelectronic money institutions (ELMIs). TheECB supported <strong>the</strong> review but expressed seriousconcerns about changing <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> ELMIs to“financial institutions”, as defined in <strong>the</strong> recastDirective 2006/48/EC, 32 since this would havefar-reaching consequences for <strong>the</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong>monetary policy. The proposed directive alsocauses concern from a supervisory perspective,as it lightens <strong>the</strong> supervisory regime <strong>of</strong> ELMIswhile simultaneously broadening <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> activities ELMIs may undertake.With regard to <strong>the</strong> Lamfalussy framework, 33 aspart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> clarifying and expanding<strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tasks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Level 3 Committees(<strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong> European <strong>Bank</strong>ingSupervisors (CEBS), <strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong> EuropeanInsurance and Occupational PensionsSupervisors (CEIOPS) and <strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong>European Securities Regulators (CESR)), <strong>the</strong>ECB was consulted on a draft Commissiondecision establishing CEBS, replacingCommission Decision 2004/10 34 . The ECBopinion 35 welcomed <strong>the</strong> proposed amendmentsand emphasised that its specific comments werewithout prejudice to possible future contributionsto <strong>the</strong> broader debate, for instance in relation to<strong>the</strong> high-level group chaired by Jacques deLarosière. The ECB suggested a fewamendments to <strong>the</strong> draft decision, in particularregarding <strong>the</strong> involvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ECB and <strong>the</strong><strong>Bank</strong>ing Supervision Committee in certainCEBS tasks. The ECB recommended ensuringconsistency between <strong>the</strong> provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> draftdecision and those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CEBS charter regardingvoting procedures and suggested that <strong>the</strong>Commission take into account <strong>the</strong>se comments,wherever applicable, for <strong>the</strong> draft decisions on<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two Level 3 Committees, on which <strong>the</strong>ECB is not being consulted.The ECB also issued an opinion 36 on a proposalfor a regulation on cross-border paymentsreplacing Regulation (EC) No 2560/2001 37 .While welcoming <strong>the</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> crossborderdirect debits in <strong>the</strong> proposed regulation,<strong>the</strong> ECB warned that balance <strong>of</strong> payments(b.o.p.) reporting issues would require carefulconsideration. In this context, it is essential that<strong>the</strong> user needs for euro area and national b.o.p.statistics be met and that <strong>the</strong> timely emergence<strong>of</strong> SEPA be safeguarded. The development <strong>of</strong>SEPA implies that b.o.p. reporting systems basedmainly on payments data cannot be maintained,as <strong>the</strong>se are for payments in euro within <strong>the</strong>29 The Capital Requirements Directive consists <strong>of</strong> Directive 2006/48/EC <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Parliament and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> 14 June 2006relating to <strong>the</strong> taking up and pursuit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> business <strong>of</strong> creditinstitutions (recast), OJ L 177, 30.6.2006, p. 1 and Directive2006/49/EC <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Parliament and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong>14 June 2006 on <strong>the</strong> capital adequacy <strong>of</strong> investment firms andcredit institutions (recast), OJ L 177, 30.6.2006, p. 201.30 CON/<strong>2008</strong>/84.31 Directive 2000/46/EC <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Parliament and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Council <strong>of</strong> 18 September 2000 on <strong>the</strong> taking up, pursuit <strong>of</strong>and prudential supervision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> business <strong>of</strong> electronic moneyinstitutions, OJ L 275, 27.10.2000, p. 39.32 See Articles 4(1) and (5) <strong>of</strong> Directive 2006/48/EC, as cited infootnote 30.33 For more details, see Section 2 <strong>of</strong> Chapter 4.34 Commission Decision 2004/10 <strong>of</strong> 5 November 2003 establishing<strong>the</strong> European <strong>Bank</strong>ing Committee, OJ L 3, 7.1.2004, p. 36.35 CON/<strong>2008</strong>/63.36 CON/2009/1.37 Regulation (EC) No 2560/2001 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Parliament and<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> 19 December 2001 on cross-border paymentsin euro, OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 13.ECBAnnual Report<strong>2008</strong>131