13.07.2015 Views

ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World

ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World

ANNUAL REPORT 2008 - Polymer Bank Notes of the World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong> Financial Collateral Directive, <strong>the</strong> proposalalso includes credit claims eligible for <strong>the</strong>collateralisation <strong>of</strong> central bank credit operationsin order to facilitate <strong>the</strong>ir use throughout <strong>the</strong> EU.In its opinion, <strong>the</strong> ECB welcomed <strong>the</strong> proposaland suggested in particular that <strong>the</strong> definition<strong>of</strong> “system” should be extended i) to expresslyinclude systems established by an ECB legalact and ii) to allow <strong>the</strong> ECB to designate suchECB systems itself. The ECB also proposedthat credit claims be included in <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Financial Collateral Directive accordingto a single general definition that is not linkedto central bank eligibility, and recommendedharmonising some elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conflict <strong>of</strong>law rules on credit claims in <strong>the</strong> EU.The ECB was also consulted on a proposal fora directive amending <strong>the</strong> Capital RequirementsDirective 29 with respect to banks affiliated tocentral institutions and certain own funds items.The ECB issued an opinion 30 on a proposalfor a directive amending <strong>the</strong> E-moneyDirective 31 which aims to open up <strong>the</strong> marketfor <strong>the</strong> issuance <strong>of</strong> electronic money, throughelectronic money institutions (ELMIs). TheECB supported <strong>the</strong> review but expressed seriousconcerns about changing <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> ELMIs to“financial institutions”, as defined in <strong>the</strong> recastDirective 2006/48/EC, 32 since this would havefar-reaching consequences for <strong>the</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong>monetary policy. The proposed directive alsocauses concern from a supervisory perspective,as it lightens <strong>the</strong> supervisory regime <strong>of</strong> ELMIswhile simultaneously broadening <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> activities ELMIs may undertake.With regard to <strong>the</strong> Lamfalussy framework, 33 aspart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> clarifying and expanding<strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tasks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Level 3 Committees(<strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong> European <strong>Bank</strong>ingSupervisors (CEBS), <strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong> EuropeanInsurance and Occupational PensionsSupervisors (CEIOPS) and <strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong>European Securities Regulators (CESR)), <strong>the</strong>ECB was consulted on a draft Commissiondecision establishing CEBS, replacingCommission Decision 2004/10 34 . The ECBopinion 35 welcomed <strong>the</strong> proposed amendmentsand emphasised that its specific comments werewithout prejudice to possible future contributionsto <strong>the</strong> broader debate, for instance in relation to<strong>the</strong> high-level group chaired by Jacques deLarosière. The ECB suggested a fewamendments to <strong>the</strong> draft decision, in particularregarding <strong>the</strong> involvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ECB and <strong>the</strong><strong>Bank</strong>ing Supervision Committee in certainCEBS tasks. The ECB recommended ensuringconsistency between <strong>the</strong> provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> draftdecision and those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CEBS charter regardingvoting procedures and suggested that <strong>the</strong>Commission take into account <strong>the</strong>se comments,wherever applicable, for <strong>the</strong> draft decisions on<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two Level 3 Committees, on which <strong>the</strong>ECB is not being consulted.The ECB also issued an opinion 36 on a proposalfor a regulation on cross-border paymentsreplacing Regulation (EC) No 2560/2001 37 .While welcoming <strong>the</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> crossborderdirect debits in <strong>the</strong> proposed regulation,<strong>the</strong> ECB warned that balance <strong>of</strong> payments(b.o.p.) reporting issues would require carefulconsideration. In this context, it is essential that<strong>the</strong> user needs for euro area and national b.o.p.statistics be met and that <strong>the</strong> timely emergence<strong>of</strong> SEPA be safeguarded. The development <strong>of</strong>SEPA implies that b.o.p. reporting systems basedmainly on payments data cannot be maintained,as <strong>the</strong>se are for payments in euro within <strong>the</strong>29 The Capital Requirements Directive consists <strong>of</strong> Directive 2006/48/EC <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Parliament and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> 14 June 2006relating to <strong>the</strong> taking up and pursuit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> business <strong>of</strong> creditinstitutions (recast), OJ L 177, 30.6.2006, p. 1 and Directive2006/49/EC <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Parliament and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong>14 June 2006 on <strong>the</strong> capital adequacy <strong>of</strong> investment firms andcredit institutions (recast), OJ L 177, 30.6.2006, p. 201.30 CON/<strong>2008</strong>/84.31 Directive 2000/46/EC <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Parliament and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Council <strong>of</strong> 18 September 2000 on <strong>the</strong> taking up, pursuit <strong>of</strong>and prudential supervision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> business <strong>of</strong> electronic moneyinstitutions, OJ L 275, 27.10.2000, p. 39.32 See Articles 4(1) and (5) <strong>of</strong> Directive 2006/48/EC, as cited infootnote 30.33 For more details, see Section 2 <strong>of</strong> Chapter 4.34 Commission Decision 2004/10 <strong>of</strong> 5 November 2003 establishing<strong>the</strong> European <strong>Bank</strong>ing Committee, OJ L 3, 7.1.2004, p. 36.35 CON/<strong>2008</strong>/63.36 CON/2009/1.37 Regulation (EC) No 2560/2001 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Parliament and<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> 19 December 2001 on cross-border paymentsin euro, OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 13.ECBAnnual Report<strong>2008</strong>131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!