13.07.2015 Views

The Little Village Gang Violence Reduction Project in Chicago

The Little Village Gang Violence Reduction Project in Chicago

The Little Village Gang Violence Reduction Project in Chicago

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

discussion <strong>in</strong> Chapter 9 sheds some light on the nature of services provided, and specificallywhether the provision of social-<strong>in</strong>tervention services was associated with lowered levels ofoffend<strong>in</strong>g and arrests.<strong>The</strong> <strong>Gang</strong>A variety of questions were asked about the program youth’s perception of their gang’sstructure, its patterns of fight<strong>in</strong>g and reasons for fight<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong>re were few gang-levelcharacteristics, per se, correlated positively or negatively with the youth’s self-reported offenseor arrest level. <strong>The</strong>re was little to dist<strong>in</strong>guish the perceptions of Lat<strong>in</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gs and Two Sixregard<strong>in</strong>g gang structure.<strong>The</strong> one mean<strong>in</strong>gful or <strong>in</strong>terpretable relationship was the youth’s perception of change <strong>in</strong>the size of the gang section to which he was most closely affiliated. If the youth perceived thathis section had become smaller, this was associated at Time III with a reduction <strong>in</strong> his total selfreportedoffenses, violence offenses, serious violence offenses, and property arrests (p # 0.05).In other words, the smaller the perceived size of the gang section over time, the less likely theyouth would be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> gang offend<strong>in</strong>g. This could suggest several th<strong>in</strong>gs: the youth himselfwas withdraw<strong>in</strong>g from the gang; others <strong>in</strong> his group were also withdraw<strong>in</strong>g; the gang sectionmay have become less “tight,” (or cohesive) and dim<strong>in</strong>ished <strong>in</strong> size; the gang section was <strong>in</strong> factsmaller; or, most important, the youth was no longer attracted to or <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the gang’scrim<strong>in</strong>al norms or activities (see also M. Kle<strong>in</strong>, 1971).<strong>The</strong> above correlation <strong>in</strong>dicates it is not only the gang’s scope, or character of operations,but also the nature of the youths’ <strong>in</strong>dividual relationships to the gang which may be associated10.20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!