The Little Village Gang Violence Reduction Project in Chicago

More documents

Recommendations

Info

13.4(c) Adjusted Mean Yearly Total Arrests (and Standard Error) and Pairwise t Testfor Arrestee Typology Main EffectArresteeTypologyNAdjustedMeanStd ErrPr > |T|Ho: Adjusted Mean(i)=Adjusted Mean(j)i/j 1 2 3 4No-Violence/No-DrugViolence/No-DrugDrug/No-ViolenceViolenceand Drug96 -2.277 0.833 1 — 0.736 0.000*** 0.000***167 1.249 0.508 3 — 0.010**22 -1.462 2.284 2 — 0.249 0.041*133 3.384 0.631 4 —For differences between groups: * p < .05; ** p < .01; and *** p < .001 .13.4(d) Adjusted Mean Yearly Total Arrests (and Standard Error) and Pairwise t Test for the Project MainEffectProject N AdjustedMeanStd ErrPr > |T|Ho: Adjusted Mean(i)=Adjusted Mean(j)i/j 1 2 3ProgramSampleComparisonSampleQuasi-ProgramSample154 0.156 0.656 1 — 0.529 0.838180 0.727 0.624 2 — 0.60184 -0.212 1.679 3 —For differences between groups: * p < .05; ** p < .01; and *** p < .001 .13.27
13.4(e) Adjusted Mean Yearly Total Arrests (and Standard Error) and Pairwise t Testfor Project V Arrestee Typology InteractionArresteeTypologyProjectaAdjust-edMeanStd ErrNPr > |T|Ho: Adjusted Mean(i)=Adjusted Mean(j)i/j 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112No-Violence/No-DrugP -2.745 1.267 26 1 — ‘* ‡ ‡ ‡ ‘*C -2.209 0.943 59 2 — † ‡ ‡ ‡ ‘*Q -1.877 1.934 11 3 — ‘* † ‘†Violence/No-DrugP 1.076 0.792 10 7 — ‘* ‘*C -0.146 0.740 11 8 — ‘* ‡ ‡Q 2.818 1.074 1 9 —Drug/No-ViolenceP -1.558 2.008 64 4 — ‘* †C 0.870 1.946 69 5 —Q -3.697 6.261 34 6 — ‘Violenceand DrugP 3.850 0.870 54 10 —C 4.396 1.043 41 11 —Q 1.907 1.313 38 12 —For differences between groups: * p < .05; † p < .01; and ‡ p < .001 .a P = Program Sample; C = Comparison Sample; Q = Quasi-Program Sample.13.28
Page 3 and 4:
FiguresFigure 2.1 - Youth Gang Crim
Page 5:
Table 10.12 - Best Model Predicting
Page 8 and 9:
Arrests, Youth With and Without “
Page 10 and 11:
...................................
Page 12 and 13:
Chapter 1Introduction and Review of
Page 14 and 15:
Gang problems have radically increa
Page 16 and 17:
for youth with school officials if
Page 18 and 19:
various agencies sponsoring the you
Page 20 and 21:
the specialized youth-gang projects
Page 22 and 23:
ehavior of the youngsters residing
Page 24 and 25:
work” (manpower training and job
Page 26 and 27:
(separately from the efforts of TWO
Page 28 and 29:
impact of CIN was not conducted (Cr
Page 30 and 31:
procedures that have often been an
Page 32 and 33:
developed programs to address the g
Page 34 and 35:
members, representing 56 agencies i
Page 36 and 37:
Grasmick (1993) recommend “the re
Page 38 and 39:
and expulsion practices in dealing
Page 40 and 41:
membership, school, job, and commun
Page 42 and 43:
Assessment, planning and evaluation
Page 44 and 45:
Human Services (DHS) was terminatin
Page 46 and 47:
IVProgram StrategyThe strategy to a
Page 48 and 49:
Community Advisory GroupA group of
Page 50 and 51:
policies and procedures which affec
Page 52 and 53:
component. The expectation was that
Page 54 and 55:
social opportunities and mobilize c
Page 56 and 57:
collective involvement of police, c
Page 58 and 59:
Figure 2.1Youth Gang Crime: A Theor
Page 60 and 61:
assistant to Alderman Guttierez, wh
Page 62 and 63:
involved in the Project and believe
Page 64 and 65:
pattern of communication between wo
Page 66 and 67:
mainly in the late afternoon, night
Page 68 and 69:
him.November 12, 7:00 PM. The 16-ye
Page 70 and 71:
station intimidating local citizens
Page 72 and 73:
Developing the Roles and Responsibi
Page 74 and 75:
on individual contact with gang you
Page 76 and 77:
individual youth. The completion of
Page 78 and 79:
tactical officers were assigned ful
Page 80 and 81:
disrespecting” the gang members.
Page 82 and 83:
Probation would be contributing thr
Page 84 and 85:
Department: “it appears criticall
Page 86 and 87:
payment to Center staff for mainten
Page 88 and 89:
Neighborhood Organization (UNO), th
Page 90 and 91:
survey. The request was possibly re
Page 92 and 93:
Gang Member Survey served both prog
Page 94 and 95:
ideologies as they interacted and w
Page 96 and 97:
their probation officers at probati
Page 98 and 99:
peripheral, or associate gang membe
Page 100 and 101:
This statement puzzled the rest of
Page 102 and 103:
the development of the Project were
Page 104 and 105:
from outside the community who inva
Page 106 and 107:
not all activities or operations of
Page 108 and 109:
Interrelated activity by Project pe
Page 110 and 111:
with the same youth, then disagreed
Page 112 and 113:
the father, in a federal penitentia
Page 114 and 115:
gangs were to be provided outreach
Page 116 and 117:
target youth to disassociate themse
Page 118 and 119:
where the youth and gangs to which
Page 120 and 121:
educational background or ability t
Page 122 and 123:
areas. They were able to inconspicu
Page 124 and 125:
out across racial or ethnic groups
Page 126 and 127:
marched into the Two Six territory
Page 128 and 129:
school to gain readmission to a reg
Page 130 and 131:
would have to travel through enemy
Page 132 and 133:
e more successful in the process of
Page 134 and 135:
other youth.The youth work Supervis
Page 136 and 137:
members, permitting the youth to st
Page 138 and 139:
problems arose that affected the ne
Page 140 and 141:
attles, or to take care of gang mem
Page 142 and 143:
Project, wrote in one of his record
Page 144 and 145:
officers of the violent crime unit
Page 146 and 147:
Rolando, a former leader of a facti
Page 148 and 149:
1. not give undue publicity to part
Page 150 and 151:
double homicide. Manuel had grown u
Page 152 and 153:
These expectations were not always
Page 154 and 155:
not wearing a shirt. His old gang t
Page 156 and 157:
former gang members, in a team arra
Page 158 and 159:
the tactical officers. The adult pr
Page 160 and 161:
field operations were expected to s
Page 162 and 163:
expected to help probation respond
Page 164 and 165:
Chicago Police Department. A key pr
Page 166 and 167:
the CPD as the senior partner) in t
Page 168 and 169:
past and present history of all Pro
Page 170 and 171:
gangs as part of their police tacti
Page 172 and 173:
say we’re just talking to these g
Page 174 and 175:
R.C.We call the detectives to see i
Page 176 and 177:
I.S.What are you doing that’s dif
Page 178 and 179:
G.S.We locked this one guy up. He w
Page 180 and 181:
indirectly at first where to go. It
Page 182 and 183:
“a real good kid. This is the fir
Page 184 and 185:
G.S.That’s part of the problem, y
Page 186 and 187:
R.C.He’s not active in the gang,
Page 188 and 189:
family, helping the worker get to a
Page 190 and 191:
G.S.As we said before, before you g
Page 192 and 193:
Chapter 7Community MobilizationIntr
Page 194 and 195:
organizational processes which affe
Page 196 and 197:
consistently made it clear that his
Page 198 and 199:
do approach of the CPD. Citizen inv
Page 200 and 201:
youth were also part of an illegal
Page 202 and 203:
seeking applicants for jobs in boom
Page 204 and 205:
part of the community.There appeare
Page 206 and 207:
epresentatives of the Chicago Parks
Page 208 and 209:
problem, especially as it affected
Page 210 and 211:
In the application for funding to t
Page 212 and 213:
with the African-American gang prob
Page 214 and 215:
purpose of the meetings was to rais
Page 216 and 217:
interagency meeting, which was fina
Page 218 and 219:
provided to the state funding agenc
Page 220 and 221:
activity, especially violence and g
Page 222 and 223:
expelling more gang members than ev
Page 224 and 225:
Chapter 8Characteristics of Program
Page 226 and 227:
youth who entered the program in ov
Page 228 and 229:
expectations, peer relationships, a
Page 230 and 231:
To determine the representativeness
Page 232 and 233:
neighborhood characteristics, as we
Page 234 and 235:
was evidence, however, that some of
Page 236 and 237:
legal sources; at Time II it was 71
Page 238 and 239:
ehavior and arrests when we later e
Page 240 and 241:
cultural institutions (e.g., povert
Page 242 and 243:
prone to attacking the Latin Kings
Page 244 and 245:
changed, and to what extent the red
Page 246 and 247:
52.0% to 70.0% of the interview sam
Page 248 and 249:
aspired to clerical, trade, and fac
Page 250 and 251:
positive at Time I and Time III, bu
Page 252 and 253:
in Little Village, who were gang me
Page 254 and 255:
involved and violent youth and assi
Page 256 and 257:
inaccuracies and inconsistencies in
Page 258 and 259:
we excluded the twelve youth over 2
Page 260 and 261:
(30.4%) and the comparison group (1
Page 262 and 263:
violence which includes, in additio
Page 264 and 265:
Chapter 9Program-Worker Contacts, S
Page 266 and 267:
easons, failed to provide tracking
Page 268 and 269:
Project police officers served or c
Page 270 and 271:
in contact with a youth 13 times pe
Page 272 and 273:
We describe the proportion of diffe
Page 274 and 275:
younger youth) were provided with s
Page 276 and 277:
involved in job-related contacts wi
Page 278 and 279:
Youth Response to the ProjectFinall
Page 280 and 281:
members of the two targeted gangs i
Page 282 and 283:
individual youth in a group context
Page 284 and 285:
Job-Related Services, the primary o
Page 286 and 287:
Aggregating Types of Services (Acti
Page 288 and 289:
workers. Of interest are the gang s
Page 290 and 291:
proportion of younger or older gang
Page 292 and 293:
Table 9.2Types of Services (Activit
Page 294 and 295:
Table 9.4Type of Service (Activity)
Page 296 and 297:
Table 9.6Job-Related Services, by T
Page 298 and 299:
Table 9.8Criminal-Justice-Related S
Page 300 and 301:
Table 9.10Aggregated Types of Perso
Page 302 and 303:
Table 9.12Project Strategies, by Yo
Page 304 and 305:
Table 9.14Services (Activities), by
Page 306 and 307:
Chapter 10Self-Reported Offense, Ar
Page 308 and 309:
7) breaking into a car and stealing
Page 310 and 311:
Similar sharp declines in frequenci
Page 312 and 313:
also in our analysis using official
Page 314 and 315:
offense and arrest categories betwe
Page 316 and 317:
(-48.3%). The least decline was for
Page 318 and 319:
a crime in the community. All of th
Page 320 and 321:
suppression effect, particularly at
Page 322 and 323:
present at Time III. There are no s
Page 324 and 325:
violence arrests and serious violen
Page 326 and 327:
with offending behavior. In the res
Page 328 and 329:
0.001), drug selling (r = 0.259, p
Page 330 and 331:
Finally, we began to test the utili
Page 332 and 333:
employment status (1= currently emp
Page 334 and 335:
includes six variables: one control
Page 336 and 337:
significance are: youth over 19 yea
Page 338 and 339:
Our best model for predicting chang
Page 340 and 341:
All of these reductions were highly
Page 342 and 343:
it in the future; and the higher th
Page 344 and 345:
The above models suggest that a var
Page 346 and 347:
Table 10.2Mean Frequencies of Self-
Page 348 and 349:
Offenses/Arrests bTable 10.4Mean Fr
Page 350 and 351:
Table 10.6Mean Frequencies of Self-
Page 352 and 353:
Table 10.8Self-Reported Offenses -
Page 354 and 355:
Table 10.10Best Model Predicting Se
Page 356 and 357:
Table 10.12Best Model Predicting Se
Page 358 and 359:
Table 10.14Best Model Predicting Ch
Page 360 and 361:
decreased or remained the same betw
Page 362 and 363:
the types and scope of arrests, and
Page 364 and 365:
Program-Period Arrest PatternsThe f
Page 366 and 367:
p = 0.039. This model explains 43.6
Page 368 and 369:
violence at Time I increases its ar
Page 370 and 371:
Model IV: Property ArrestsThe same
Page 372 and 373:
The drug-change model was construct
Page 374 and 375:
Our analysis procedure is the same
Page 376 and 377:
types of arrests, comparing Time I
Page 378 and 379:
were at Time II, at least for relat
Page 380 and 381:
Figure 11.1Distribution of Youth in
Page 382 and 383:
Four Levels of Arrests for theThree
Page 384 and 385:
11.3(c) Adjusted Mean Change in Tot
Page 386 and 387:
11.4(c) Adjusted Mean Change in Ser
Page 388 and 389:
Table 11.5An Analysis of Variance o
Page 390 and 391:
11.5(f) Adjusted Mean Change in Tot
Page 392 and 393:
11.6(c) Adjusted Mean Change in Pro
Page 394 and 395:
11.7(c) Adjusted Mean Change in Dru
Page 396 and 397:
Table 11.8An Analysis of Variance o
Page 398 and 399:
11.8(f) Adjusted Mean Change in Oth
Page 400 and 401:
11.9(c) Adjusted Mean Change in Spe
Page 402 and 403:
Chapter 12Modeling Program Effects:
Page 404 and 405:
variables. We used the number of an
Page 406 and 407:
when the outcome variable was chang
Page 408 and 409: delinquency patterns over the progr
Page 410 and 411: and self-reported-offense variables
Page 412 and 413: Again, most variables are derived f
Page 414 and 415: (p = 0.032), but a positive relatio
Page 416 and 417: We try to identify those specific c
Page 418 and 419: likelihood of more youth spending l
Page 420 and 421: outcome, using police arrest data f
Page 422 and 423: Table 12.1Pre-Program a Arrest Patt
Page 424 and 425: Table 12.3Best Model Predicting Cha
Page 426 and 427: Table 12.5Best Model Predicting Cha
Page 428 and 429: 12.6.B-1 Job Referral Success by Wo
Page 430 and 431: 12.6.E-1 Length of Service Contact
Page 432 and 433: Chapter 13Typology of Gang YouthFor
Page 434 and 435: markets, resulting in high levels o
Page 436 and 437: individual gang youth in our Little
Page 438 and 439: “other” crimes. Nevertheless, f
Page 440 and 441: type of youth-arrestee subsample, i
Page 442 and 443: and a greater increase or “specia
Page 444 and 445: these youth were represented in the
Page 446 and 447: number of offenses at Time I, but a
Page 448 and 449: Total Arrests. In the model with th
Page 450 and 451: The 19-and-over program sample also
Page 452 and 453: We find similar and proportionate d
Page 454 and 455: Table 13.2Yearly Arrests of Youth i
Page 456 and 457: Table 13.3 continuedFootnotesaArres
Page 460 and 461: 13.4(f) Adjusted Mean Yearly Total
Page 462 and 463: 13.5(c) Adjusted Mean Yearly Seriou
Page 464 and 465: Table 13.6Analysis of Variance of C
Page 466 and 467: 13.6(e) Adjusted Mean Yearly Total
Page 468 and 469: 13.7(c) Adjusted Mean Yearly Drug A
Page 470 and 471: Table 13.8Analysis of Variance of C
Page 472 and 473: 13.8(e) Adjusted Mean Yearly Other
Page 474 and 475: Chapter 14The Effectiveness of the
Page 476 and 477: of the specific types of services p
Page 478 and 479: The success rate was relatively hig
Page 480 and 481: in respect to the outcome or depend
Page 482 and 483: (odds ratio = 3.31) and the Latin K
Page 484 and 485: violent behavior, was associated wi
Page 486 and 487: drug arrests, in a model together w
Page 488 and 489: SummaryIn general, “very effectiv
Page 490 and 491: than do non-services contacts. The
Page 492 and 493: per youth, and the perceptions by t
Page 494 and 495: educing violence arrests, and viole
Page 496 and 497: assume, because of small size, that
Page 498 and 499: program subsample (39.1%). Also, th
Page 500 and 501: patterns, in particular types or co
Page 502 and 503: Table 14.1Summary of Logistic Regre
Page 508 and 509:
Table 14.7Summary of Logistic Regre
Page 510 and 511:
Table 14.9Summary of Logistic Regre
Page 512 and 513:
Table 14.11Summary of Logistic Regr
Page 514 and 515:
Page 516 and 517:
Page 518 and 519:
Page 520 and 521:
Table 14.19Comparison of Odds Ratio
Page 522 and 523:
Table 14.21Most Serious Sentencing
Page 524 and 525:
Table 14.23Arrestee Typology of You
Page 526 and 527:
Chapter 15Aggregate-Level Changes I
Page 528 and 529:
Comparable Police Districts and Bea
Page 530 and 531:
and aggravated assaults with a hand
Page 532 and 533:
Section I[Refer to Tables 15.1 to 1
Page 534 and 535:
It is also important to note that l
Page 536 and 537:
target gangs during the last two ye
Page 538 and 539:
than the average percentage increas
Page 540 and 541:
number of offenders in the District
Page 542 and 543:
involved in drug arrests. Again, a
Page 544 and 545:
accounted for only a small increase
Page 546 and 547:
Table 15.1 aGang Incident Data - Vi
Page 548 and 549:
Table 15.3 aGang Incident Data - To
Page 550 and 551:
Table 15.5 aGang Incident Data - Dr
Page 552 and 553:
Table 15.7 aGang Offender Data - Vi
Page 554 and 555:
Table 15.9 aGang Offender Data - Vi
Page 556 and 557:
Table 15.11 aGang Offender Data - V
Page 558 and 559:
Table 15.13 aGang Offender Data - L
Page 560 and 561:
Table 15.15 aGang Offender Data - A
Page 562 and 563:
Table 15.17 aGang Offender Data - A
Page 564 and 565:
Table 15.19 aGang Offender Data - W
Page 566 and 567:
Table 15.21 aGang Offender Data - D
Page 568 and 569:
Table 15.23 aGang Offender Data - D
Page 570 and 571:
Table 15.25 aGang Offender Data - F
Page 572 and 573:
Table 15.27 aNon-Gang Incidents - V
Page 574 and 575:
years of its existence than in the
Page 576 and 577:
crime is best sustained during both
Page 578 and 579:
Figure 15.1AComparison of Average Y
Page 580 and 581:
Figure 15.3ATen-Year Trend of Gang
Page 582 and 583:
Figure 15.1BComparison of Average Y
Page 584 and 585:
Figure 15.3BSix-Year Trend of Gang
Page 586 and 587:
the gang problem (i.e., number of s
Page 588 and 589:
Section IVwith Rolando V. SosaIncid
Page 590 and 591:
SummaryThe aggregate patterns of ch
Page 592 and 593:
Village the serious gang violence r
Page 594 and 595:
cultural, and health institutions s
Page 596 and 597:
II. While every attempt was made to
Page 598 and 599:
worse had dropped by almost half be
Page 600 and 601:
few respondents in either community
Page 602 and 603:
Pilsen). These declines between tim
Page 604 and 605:
I (n = 94) to 20.0% at Time II (n =
Page 606 and 607:
(Chisquare = 4.723, df = 1, p # 0.0
Page 608 and 609:
territory), there was no longer a s
Page 610 and 611:
increase in Little Village can be a
Page 612 and 613:
Time I and Time II. Slightly more o
Page 614 and 615:
can be associated with the GVRP (pa
Page 616 and 617:
Pilsen respondents did. Pilsen repr
Page 618 and 619:
and from 84.5% to 67.3% in Pilsen (
Page 620 and 621:
educe the presence of gangs in the
Page 622 and 623:
followed by improved schools, incre
Page 624 and 625:
particular, were less afraid in the
Page 626 and 627:
Table 16.1Community Characteristics
Page 628 and 629:
Table 16.3Problems in the Community
Page 630 and 631:
Table 16.5Gang-Motivated and Non Ga
Page 632 and 633:
Table 16.7What Police Do to Deal wi
Page 634 and 635:
Table 16.9Amount of Gang-Motivated
Page 636 and 637:
Table 16.11What Police Do to Deal w
Page 638 and 639:
Table 16.13Organizations Believe Co
Page 640 and 641:
Table 16.15Amount of Gang-Motivated
Page 642 and 643:
Table 16.17What Probation Officers
Page 644 and 645:
he quickly assumed coordination and
Page 646 and 647:
• Communication: Perhaps more imp
Page 648 and 649:
to your proposal.”In a November 1
Page 650 and 651:
foundations, and other sources. The
Page 652 and 653:
knowledge or permission of the Coor
Page 654 and 655:
although we expect to expand many e
Page 656 and 657:
Project staff were notified of prog
Page 658 and 659:
police, probation and youth workers
Page 660 and 661:
ideological terms between 1992 and
Page 662 and 663:
esponsibility of Project operations
Page 664 and 665:
• Program features: The program h
Page 666 and 667:
In a November 1996 monthly report,
Page 668 and 669:
activities with adult probation. Th
Page 670 and 671:
conflict with each other. MLG and t
Page 672 and 673:
program might look like.We have ben
Page 674 and 675:
arrangement was delayed and interru
Page 676 and 677:
CPD and CCDAP probably did not clea
Page 678 and 679:
18.18
Page 680 and 681:
Carney, Frank J., Hans W. Mattick a
Page 682 and 683:
Klein, Malcolm W. 1968 (July). The
Page 684 and 685:
Short, James F., Jr, and Fred L. St
Page 686:
Swans, Bennie J. 1981 (May 11). Cri
show all

The Little Village Gang Violence Reduction Project in Chicago

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?