Advances in Water Treatment and Enviromental Management

In summary, to quote reference 10, could it be thatGAS LIQUID MIXING AND MASS TRANSFER 127“…mechanical devices, economy of thought or love of concrete have ruled design”.7. Concluding RemarksAs stated at the outset, this paper has not intended to provide deep analysis andinsights into the differences between chemical pharmaceutical processes and wastewater treatment.However, it is hoped that, by setting down the different techniques used in bothindustries, it will prompt members of both, and particularly the water industry,to think about how they might use each other’s expertise and investigate theliterature and other sources of data more fully. If so, the paper will have achievedits purpose.References1. “Gas Dispersion Performance in Fermenter Operation” A.W.Nienow, Chem. Eng. Progress,February 1990.2. “High Intensity In-Line Mass Transfer Equipment, A Collaborative R&D Programme:HILINE. Proposal to Potential Members”. A.J. Green, BHR Group, June 1988.3. “Sorption Characteristics for gas-liquid contacting in mixed vessels” M.Zlokarnik, Adv.in Biochem Eng. 8 134 (1978)4. “The effect of contaminants on the oxygen transfer rate achieved with a plunging jetcontactor” J.A.C.van de Donk, R.G.J.M.Lans, J.M.Smith, 3rd European Conference onMixing, York, BHRA, pp 289–297 (1979).5. “Energy Saving by Fine-bubble Aeration” B.Chambers & G.L.Jones. Water PollutionControl (1985).6. “The Development & site testing of an aerator”, R.King & H.C.Young. Symposium onthe Profitable Aeration of Waste Water, London. BHRA pp 31–54, April 1980.7. “Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Bioreactor Fluid Dynamics” R. King(ed), Cambridge. BHRA 1988.8. “Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Mixing”, Pavia, Italy, 1988. Distributedby BHRA.9. “Jet Mixing Design Guide” R.K.Grenville, BHRA (confidential to FMP members).