13.07.2015 Views

Advances in Water Treatment and Enviromental Management

Advances in Water Treatment and Enviromental Management

Advances in Water Treatment and Enviromental Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GROUNDWATER POLLUTION BY VOLATILE ORGANIC SOLVENTS 211Fig 8 Removal of trichloroethene by Air Stripp<strong>in</strong>g (Case A)Snowflake Type II <strong>and</strong> this was the first occasion that this has been used for such applications<strong>in</strong> the UK although experience exists <strong>in</strong> the USA. This pack<strong>in</strong>g has the benefit of a low pressuredrop thereby allow<strong>in</strong>g the full flow to pass through a s<strong>in</strong>gle tower <strong>in</strong> the event of a fan failure.As stated <strong>in</strong> Section 2 the well has a history of organic contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> therefore activatedcarbon was <strong>in</strong>stalled after the stripp<strong>in</strong>g columns as a “polish<strong>in</strong>g” stage.Removal efficiencies specified were 88% for TCE 90%, PCE <strong>and</strong> 80% for CTC.Commission<strong>in</strong>gPoor removal efficiencies were observed dur<strong>in</strong>g the commission<strong>in</strong>g of the works. As can beseen from the results <strong>in</strong> Table 2, the TCE removal was only 72% as compared with a designvalue of 88%.Clearly the performance fell considerably short of the target with K L a from Eq 3 equal to 26.2.The theoretical value of K L a expected for the towers as designed (calculated from Eq 4) was 99.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!