13.07.2015 Views

Advances in Water Treatment and Enviromental Management

Advances in Water Treatment and Enviromental Management

Advances in Water Treatment and Enviromental Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RIVER FANE FLOW REGULATION SCHEME 235It is a characteristic of the flows on the Fane System that although the Mean AnnualFlow is respectably high, flows at or above this level do not persist over anyth<strong>in</strong>glike half the year, <strong>and</strong> much lower flows are experienced over long periods <strong>in</strong> driersummers. The geology of the catchment is mostly Ordovician-Silurian Shales withsome S<strong>and</strong>stone Drifts <strong>and</strong> the Fane Catchment shares with the nearby Clyde <strong>and</strong>Dee Catchments a particularly low baseflow contribution from groundwater <strong>in</strong>prolonged dry weather (Fig 2).S<strong>in</strong>ce the headworks are some distance upstream of the abstraction po<strong>in</strong>t, our<strong>in</strong>itial assumption was that <strong>in</strong>termediate catchment flow could be counted upon topermit fractional releases at Lough Muckno. This assumption was tested bycomparison of the flows at Clarebane Bridge <strong>and</strong> downstream at Moyles Mill overdifferent periods of the year. When adjustment was made for the exist<strong>in</strong>g watersupply abstraction from Lough Ross it was found that the overall correspondencebetween Catchment Area <strong>and</strong> Mean Annual Flow did not persist <strong>in</strong>to the drierperiods of the year. In 1975 for example 97% of the flow at Moyles Mill <strong>in</strong> May wasalready <strong>in</strong> the river at Clarebane Bridge <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g month the flows atboth stations were equal (when allowance for Newry is made). In June 1976 thefigure was 87% <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> May 1977 it was 91%. In design<strong>in</strong>g releases from LoughMuckno for abstraction at Stephenstown dur<strong>in</strong>g severe drought periods it wastherefore assumed that the <strong>in</strong>termediate catchment would contribute negligibleamounts to the overall flow arriv<strong>in</strong>g at the Intake.3. HEADWORKS DESIGN3.1 Pump<strong>in</strong>g Station DesignBased on a Hydrographie Survey of Lough Muckno, a Storage/Elevation curve forthe Lake was prepared prior to the <strong>Water</strong> Order Enquiry of 1982. The flow recordsfor 1975 & ‘76 suggested that <strong>in</strong> particularly dry years, with all <strong>Water</strong> SupplyAuthorities draw<strong>in</strong>g at full dem<strong>and</strong>, water level on Lough Muckno could drop to88.6m above OD compared to normal summer levels of 91.0m OD. S<strong>in</strong>ce the Pump<strong>in</strong>gStation is located approximately 450m from the lake outlet, <strong>and</strong> allow<strong>in</strong>g for channellosses it became clear that a direct access for water from the 88m OD contour <strong>in</strong>the lake to the Pump<strong>in</strong>g Station would be required <strong>and</strong> that the Wet Wells <strong>in</strong> theStation itself would have to anticipate a maximum drawdown water level of 88.0mOD at the Station. The construction of a l<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> normally submerged concreteRevetment Channel <strong>in</strong> the bed of the Clarebane River between Lough Muckno <strong>and</strong>the Pump<strong>in</strong>g Station therefore formed part of the Civil Works Contract.The Pump<strong>in</strong>g Rate depends on the flow defecit between water dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> thenaturally available flow <strong>in</strong> the Fane at Stephenstown, so that the Pumps are variablespeed pumps capable of pump<strong>in</strong>g over a flow range from 11.4 Ml/d. to 56.8 Ml/d.3.2 Gate ControlActivation of the Gates from the passive W<strong>in</strong>ter position will take place on reach<strong>in</strong>ga predeterm<strong>in</strong>ed po<strong>in</strong>t on a fall<strong>in</strong>g recession hydrograph, or on reach<strong>in</strong>g apredeterm<strong>in</strong>ed date. The PLC will control the rais<strong>in</strong>g of the Gates so as to pass theRegulation Flow while impound<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to storage, aim<strong>in</strong>g to just achieve a full storagewhen drafts from storage are first required. <strong>Water</strong> Level upstream <strong>and</strong> downstreamis logged at 15 m<strong>in</strong>ute <strong>in</strong>tervals <strong>and</strong> the Gates pause at each movement (for aperiod which is related to the response time of the Clarebane River) dur<strong>in</strong>g whichthe effect of the adjustment is monitored.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!