5 th <strong>European</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Virology</strong>Objectives: a study <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> viral co infections, in vitro and in vivoduring the follow up <strong>of</strong> 36 umbilical cord blood stem cell recipients inBordeaux (2011 2012).1) Experimental study: to analyse the impact <strong>of</strong> AdV HCMV co infectionin vitro on the replication <strong>of</strong> each virus (infections, co infections andsuper infections <strong>of</strong> MRC5 cells, with laboratory strains HCMV AD169and AdV5) and cell gene expression (interferon beta mRNAs).2) Clinical study: to describe the natural history <strong>of</strong> viral co infections incord blood recipients, with HCMV, EBV, HHV6, BKV and AdV monitoringand analyse the clinical outcome according to the existence <strong>of</strong> singleviral infections or co infections.Results: HCMV AdV co infection enhanced HCMV replication in MRC5cells; this tendency observed during in vitro simultaneous co infection reacheda difference <strong>of</strong> 2 log10 for HCMV viral load in culture supernatantswhen AdV superinfection was applied 48 hours after HCMV infection(quantitative real time PCR assays for HCMV UL83 and AdV Hexon genesin culture supernatants). Confocal microscopic examination <strong>of</strong> infectedcells demonstrated simultaneous co infection in certain cells (immune fluorescencein infected cells with antibodies directed against HCMV pp65,HCMV IE1 and pan AdV, Argène Biomérieux, France). Interferon betamRNAs relative quantification indicated a two to three fold increase in coinfected cultures compared to single infections. Clinically, only 4 patientsout <strong>of</strong> 36 presented no viral opportunistic infection. Single infections werediagnosed in 7 patients (19%), dual infections in 9 (25%) and in 16 patients(44%) three viruses or more were detected during the first term followingtransplantation. The analysis <strong>of</strong> patient’s outcome, taking into accountmajor clinical endpoints (viral disease, Graft versus Host Disease anddeath) and virological data (viral loads and kinetics) is presently beingperformed.Conclusions: Viral co habitation in cord blood recipients is frequent andcould have a clinical impact. Viral co infection experiments confirm thepossible existence <strong>of</strong> co activation mechanisms in dually infected cells.REF 551Comparison <strong>of</strong> two assays for CMV viral load expressed in InternationalUnits in plasma and whole bloodPaolo RAVANINI, Tiziana DI FATTA, Maura BANDI, Anna MariaNICOSIA, Maria Grazia CROBUAOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara, ITALYRecently an international standard for CMV has been established by WHO.This improvement can lead to a better comparison among the results obtainedwith different diagnostic assays and biological materials (plasma andwhole blood).In this study, the results <strong>of</strong> two CMV viral load assays were compared toverify the concordance <strong>of</strong> the results expressed in International Units (IU),the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the assays and the different biological materials, and to seta possible conversion factor between results from plasma and whole blood.Two Real Time PCR assays were used (RealTime CMV, Abbott; AlertCMV Q PCR, Nanogen). All results were expressed in IU/ml. Plasma andwhole blood samples, collected at the same time for both materials from47 kidney transplant recipients, were tested with both assays. The resultssuggest that both plasma and whole blood can be effectively used with bothassays for the monitoring <strong>of</strong> CMV viral loads in transplant recipients. Bothassays show good sensitivity in plasma (92.3 and 94.9% respectively),while in whole blood the Abbott assay shows better sensitivity (84.6 vs71.8%). In both cases, the sensitivity in plasma appears higher than inwhole blood. The concordance <strong>of</strong> the results in IU/ml is good between thetwo assays (100% <strong>of</strong> the results under 0.5 Log variation for both materials).The mean viral load difference between whole blood and plasma resultsis 1.63 fold. This conversion factor should be taken into account in theassessment <strong>of</strong> different threshold values for preemptive therapy when theviral load is determined in plasma or whole blood.REF 550Low level DNAemia <strong>of</strong> Parvovirus B19 (genotypes 1–3) in Adult TransplantRecipients is not Associated with AnaemiaSusanne MODROW, Annelie PLENTZ, Michael WÜRDINGER,Matthias KUDLICHUniversity <strong>of</strong> Regensburg, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Regensburg,GERMANYAfter acute parvovirus B19 (B19 V) infection <strong>of</strong> immunocompetentindividuals, viral genomes persist lifelong in various tissues. In immunocompromisedpatients, acute B19 V infection may be associated withsevere anaemia. It is unclear whether reactivation <strong>of</strong> latent B19 V genomesmay contribute to persistent viraemia and anaemia in transplant recipients.We retrospectively analyzed the impact <strong>of</strong> B19 V infection in 371 adulttransplant recipients (kidney, liver, heart, bone marrow). The patients’ pretransplantation serostatus was determined. 1431 serum or plasma samplesobtained in monthly intervals during six months following transplantationwere analyzed for the presence <strong>of</strong> B19 V DNA by qPCR which allowsdiscrimination between B19 V genotypes 1 3.Overall, 82% <strong>of</strong> the patients were seropositive indicating past B19 V infection.B19 V DNA was detected in <strong>of</strong> 4.0% <strong>of</strong> all patients and classified asgenotype 1 in 12, genotype 2 in one and genotype 3 in two patients, theDNA load ranging from
5 th <strong>European</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Virology</strong>REF 553The prevalence <strong>of</strong> DNA HSV 1 and HSV 2 in Polish patients subjectedto allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationSylwia RYNANS 1 , Agnieszka TOMASZEWSKA 2 , TomaszDZIECIATKOWSKI 1,3 , Katarzyna MOCKO 4 , Anna MAJEWSKA 1 ,Maciej PRZYBYLSKI 1,3 , Kazimierz HALABURDA 5 , GrazynaMLYNARCZYK 11 3Medical University <strong>of</strong> Warsaw, Chair and Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Microbiology,Warsaw, POLAND; 2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Hematology and TransfusionMedicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Haemopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation, Warsaw,POLAND; 3 2Central Clinical Hospital in Warsaw, Department <strong>of</strong>Microbiology, Warsaw, POLAND; 4 Warsaw University <strong>of</strong> Life Sciences,SGGW, Interfaculty Department <strong>of</strong> Biotechnology, Warsaw, POLAND;5 Medical University <strong>of</strong> Warsaw, Department <strong>of</strong> Hematology, Oncologyand Internal Medicine, Warsaw, POLANDHerpes simplex viruses type 1 (HSV 1) and 2 (HSV 2) belong to widespreadcontagious factors. A situation might becomes dangerous whenpatient is subjected to hematopoietic stem cells transplantations (HSCT)with the pr<strong>of</strong>ound immunosuppression. A retrospective review <strong>of</strong> serasamples coming from collection <strong>of</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Microbiology fromgroup <strong>of</strong> 54 adult recipients <strong>of</strong> allogeneic HSCT was made. All <strong>of</strong>them received anti viral prophylaxis, using oral form <strong>of</strong> acyclovir. Serumsamples taken before transplant were examined for presence <strong>of</strong> specificanti HSV 1 and anti HSV 2 antibodies in IgM and IgG classes. After transplantationquantitative real time PCR was used to determine viral load inplasma samples in range 0 100 days. Achieved results showed that antibodiesdirected against the HSV 1 in IgG class were appearing in the 87%examined persons and anti HSV 2 IgM antibodies in 3% patients. ViralDNA was detected in plasma samples in 15 (27,8%) <strong>of</strong> the 54 recipients,mostly between day 21st and day 45th <strong>of</strong> transplantation. All <strong>of</strong> themdeveloped fever <strong>of</strong> unknown origin, and over 50% had GvHD features.All <strong>of</strong> positive patients have HSV 1 viremia; none <strong>of</strong> HHV 2 DNA wasdetected. There is a high frequency <strong>of</strong> detectable HSV 1/2 viral load inalloHSCT recipients and it may lead to an increased risk for fatal symptomaticdisease. The availability <strong>of</strong> quantitative real time PCR method meansthat results are available in a clinically helpful time frame, which shouldassist with implementing timely therapeutic intervention and assessingresponse to treatment.REF 554Use <strong>of</strong> multiplex real time PCR assay for detection and differentiationviral haemorrhagic cystis in patients undergoing allogeneichaematopoietic stem cell transplantationSylwia RYNANS 1 , Tomasz DZECIATKOWSKI 1,2 , MaciejPRZYBYLSKI 1,2 , Agnieszka TOMASZEWSKA 3 , KazmierzHALABURDA 4 , Grazyna MLYNARCZYK 11 Medical University <strong>of</strong> Warsaw, Chair and Department <strong>of</strong> MedicalMicrobiology, Warsaw, POLAND; 2 Central Clinical Hospital in Warsaw,Department <strong>of</strong> Microbiology, Warsaw, POLAND; 3 Institute <strong>of</strong> Hematologyand Transfusion Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Haemopoetic Stem CellTransplantation, Warsaw, POLAND; 4 Medical University <strong>of</strong> Warsaw,Department <strong>of</strong> Hematology, Oncology and Internal Medicine, Warsaw,POLANDHaemorrhagic cystitis (HC) is characterized by painful haematuria dueto haemorrhagic inflammation <strong>of</strong> the urinary bladder mucosa. This complicationin group <strong>of</strong> allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation(HSCT) is associated with the reactivation <strong>of</strong> urotropic viruses, such ashuman adenoviruses (HAdV) and polyomavirus BK (BKV). The majoraim <strong>of</strong> this study was to develop a duplex real time PCR assay for thesimultaneous detection <strong>of</strong> HAdV and BKV using TaqMan hydrolyzingprobes. Second aim was a retrospective review <strong>of</strong> group <strong>of</strong> 64 adult recipients<strong>of</strong> allogeneic HSCT with history <strong>of</strong> haemorrhagic cystitis. 92 serumand 141 urine samples were examined for presence <strong>of</strong> HAdV/BKV DNA,using quantitative real time PCR to determine viral load in range 40 80days after HSCT. Viral DNA was detected in the sera samples <strong>of</strong> 31 persons(48%): BKV in 9 (14%) and HAdV in 22 (34%). Viruria was detected in:BKV in samples taken from 24 (37,5%) and HAdV from 55 (86%) individuals,showing symptoms <strong>of</strong> late haemorrhagic cystitis. None <strong>of</strong> describedindividuals died during detectable viremia period. Obtained quantitativeresults usually were at low to medium level, placed between 100-1500copies/ml for sera and 400-18000 copies/ml for urine samples, respectively.There is a high frequency <strong>of</strong> detectable HAdV viremia in HSCTrecipients with signs <strong>of</strong> haemorrhagic cystitis. Furthermore, establishment<strong>of</strong> appropriate procedures for monitoring active HAdV/BKV infection isimportant to clarify the virus infection in transplant recipients.REF 555Cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 7 co infections in Polishadults subjected to allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantationsSylwia RYNANS 1 , Agnieszka TOMASZEWSKA 2 , TomaszDZIECIATKOWSKI 2,3 , Anna KRYSKO 4 , Maciej PRZYBYLSKI 2,3 ,Karolina PIEKARSKA 5 , Kazimierz HALABURDA 6 , GrazynaMLYNARCZYK 11 Medical University <strong>of</strong> Warsaw, Chair and Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Microbiology,Warsaw, POLAND; 2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Hematology and TransfusionMedicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Haemopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation, Warsaw,POLAND; 3 Central Clinical Hospital in Warsaw, Department <strong>of</strong>Microbiology, Warsaw, POLAND; 4 Warsaw University <strong>of</strong> Life Sciences– SGGW, Interfaculty Department <strong>of</strong> Biotechnology, Warsaw, POLAND;5 Medical University <strong>of</strong> Warsaw, 2nd Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Warsaw,POLAND; 6 Medical University <strong>of</strong> Warsaw, Department <strong>of</strong> Hematology,Oncology and Internal Medicine, Warsaw, POLANDHuman herpesvirus 7 (HHV 7) is widespread around the world and mayalso be a possible c<strong>of</strong>actor for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in haematopoieticstem cell transplant recipients (HSCT). In case <strong>of</strong> viral diseaseswhere specific treatment is available, real time PCR assays constitutereliable diagnostic tools enabling timely initiation <strong>of</strong> appropriate therapy.The presence <strong>of</strong> CMV and HHV 7 was confirmed by the detection <strong>of</strong> DNAisolated from 1027 plasma samples. A group <strong>of</strong> 69 HSCT recipients wasexamined in early post transplant period using quantitative real time PCR.Within the study period, 62% <strong>of</strong> patients had at least once CMV DNAemia, while HHV 7 DNA was found in 43% <strong>of</strong> subjects. Co infection wasdetected in the plasma samples collected from 18 patients (26%). Patientswith concomitant HHV 7 DNA emia had significantly higher number <strong>of</strong>CMV DNA copies compared with those without HHV 7 infection (1986vs. 432 copies/ml) but there was no difference in duration <strong>of</strong> CMV DNAemia between these groups. On the other hand, while the load <strong>of</strong> HHV 7DNA was comparable between patients with CMV DNA emia and withoutCMV DNA emia, the duration <strong>of</strong> HHV 7 DNA emia was significantlylonger in the first group (38.5 vs. 14 days). HHV 7 DNA emia is veryfrequently detected in Polish HSCT recipients. In those, who have subsequentCMV reactivation, the coexistence <strong>of</strong> the viruses may negativelyaffect the kinetics <strong>of</strong> infection with either <strong>of</strong> them. Therefore the investigation<strong>of</strong> concomitant HHV 7 DNA emia could affect the prognosis <strong>of</strong>post transplant patients suffering from CMV reactivation.REF 556Effect <strong>of</strong> a TNF alpha antagonist based therapy on the VZV specificT cell immunity in a cohort <strong>of</strong> psoriatic patientsAlda SALDAN 1 , Elena SANDINI 2 , Daniel TINTO 1 , StefanoPIASERICO 2 , Andrea PESERICO 2 , Giorgio PALÙ 1 , Davide ABATE 11 Department <strong>of</strong> Molecular Medicine, University <strong>of</strong> Padova, Padova,ITALY; 2 Dermatology Unit, Padova General Hospital, Padova, ITALYIntroduction: biological antagonists <strong>of</strong> TNF (etanercept, adalimumab)are currently used for the treatment <strong>of</strong> severe psoriasis. One <strong>of</strong> theS274 Vi<strong>rologie</strong>, Vol 17, supplément 2, septembre 2013
- Page 3 and 4:
Contents5 th European Congress of V
- Page 5 and 6:
i r o l o g i eList of Keynote Spea
- Page 7 and 8:
i r o l o g i eList of Chairpersons
- Page 9 and 10:
i r o l o g i eWelcomeWelcome to th
- Page 11 and 12:
5 th European Congress of VirologyY
- Page 13 and 14:
i r o l o g i eExhibitorsThe indust
- Page 15:
i r o l o g i eFacilities for the 5
- Page 18 and 19:
i r o l o g i eGeneral Information
- Page 20 and 21:
PROGRAMME AT A GLANCEWednesday 11th
- Page 22 and 23:
5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 24 and 25:
5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 26 and 27:
5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 28 and 29:
5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 30 and 31:
5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 32 and 33:
Scientific Programme -Saturday 14 t
- Page 34 and 35:
5 th European Congress of Virology1
- Page 36 and 37:
5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 38 and 39:
5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 40 and 41:
5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 42 and 43:
5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 44 and 45:
5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 46 and 47:
5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 48 and 49:
5 th European Congress of VirologyT
- Page 50 and 51:
5 th European Congress of VirologyT
- Page 52 and 53:
5 th European Congress of VirologyT
- Page 54 and 55:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 56 and 57:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 58 and 59:
5 th European Congress of Virologyw
- Page 60 and 61:
5 th European Congress of VirologyT
- Page 62 and 63:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 64 and 65:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 66 and 67:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 68 and 69:
5 th European Congress of VirologyT
- Page 70 and 71:
5 th European Congress of VirologyA
- Page 72 and 73:
5 th European Congress of Virologyp
- Page 74 and 75:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 76 and 77:
5 th European Congress of VirologyF
- Page 78 and 79:
5 th European Congress of VirologyF
- Page 80 and 81:
5 th European Congress of Virologyc
- Page 82 and 83:
5 th European Congress of VirologyF
- Page 84 and 85:
5 th European Congress of VirologyF
- Page 86 and 87:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 88 and 89:
5 th European Congress of VirologyH
- Page 90 and 91:
5 th European Congress of VirologyF
- Page 92 and 93:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 94 and 95:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 96 and 97:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 98 and 99:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 100 and 101:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 102 and 103:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 104 and 105:
5 th European Congress of VirologyA
- Page 106 and 107:
5 th European Congress of Virology1
- Page 108 and 109:
5 th European Congress of Virology1
- Page 110 and 111:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 112 and 113:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 114 and 115:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 116 and 117:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 118 and 119:
Virologie 2013, 17 (supplément 2)
- Page 120 and 121:
5 th European Congress of VirologyA
- Page 122 and 123:
5 th European Congress of Virology0
- Page 124 and 125:
5 th European Congress of Virology0
- Page 126 and 127:
5 th European Congress of VirologyH
- Page 128 and 129:
5 th European Congress of Virologys
- Page 130 and 131:
5 th European Congress of Virology0
- Page 132 and 133:
5 th European Congress of Virologyf
- Page 134 and 135:
5 th European Congress of VirologyE
- Page 136 and 137:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 138 and 139:
5 th European Congress of VirologyA
- Page 140 and 141:
5 th European Congress of Virologyp
- Page 142 and 143:
5 th European Congress of Virology0
- Page 144 and 145:
5 th European Congress of Virologyi
- Page 146 and 147:
5 th European Congress of Virologyr
- Page 148 and 149:
5 th European Congress of Virologyi
- Page 150 and 151:
5 th European Congress of Virologyp
- Page 152 and 153:
5 th European Congress of Virology3
- Page 154 and 155:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 156 and 157:
5 th European Congress of Virology0
- Page 158 and 159:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 160 and 161:
5 th European Congress of VirologyB
- Page 162 and 163:
5 th European Congress of Virologyr
- Page 164 and 165:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 166 and 167:
5 th European Congress of Virologyi
- Page 168 and 169:
5 th European Congress of VirologyI
- Page 170 and 171:
5 th European Congress of Virologyf
- Page 172 and 173:
5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 174 and 175:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 176 and 177:
5 th European Congress of Virology1
- Page 178 and 179:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 180 and 181:
5 th European Congress of VirologyV
- Page 182 and 183:
5 th European Congress of Virologyc
- Page 184 and 185:
5 th European Congress of Virologyw
- Page 186 and 187:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 188 and 189:
5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 190 and 191:
5 th European Congress of VirologyA
- Page 192 and 193:
5 th European Congress of Virologyn
- Page 194 and 195:
5 th European Congress of Virologyi
- Page 196 and 197:
5 th European Congress of Virologyw
- Page 198 and 199:
5 th European Congress of VirologyT
- Page 200 and 201:
5 th European Congress of Virology(
- Page 202 and 203:
5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 204 and 205:
5 th European Congress of Virology1
- Page 206 and 207:
5 th European Congress of Virologyo
- Page 208 and 209:
5 th European Congress of VirologyI
- Page 210 and 211:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 212 and 213:
5 th European Congress of Virologyw
- Page 214 and 215:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 216 and 217:
5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 218 and 219:
5 th European Congress of Virologyp
- Page 220 and 221:
5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 222 and 223:
5 th European Congress of Virology(
- Page 224 and 225: 5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 226 and 227: 5 th European Congress of Virologyn
- Page 228 and 229: 5 th European Congress of Virologyi
- Page 230 and 231: 5 th European Congress of Virologyo
- Page 232 and 233: 5 th European Congress of Virology2
- Page 234 and 235: 5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 236 and 237: 5 th European Congress of Virology7
- Page 238 and 239: 5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 240 and 241: 5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 242 and 243: 5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 244 and 245: 5 th European Congress of Virologyc
- Page 246 and 247: 5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 248 and 249: 5 th European Congress of Virologyh
- Page 250 and 251: 5 th European Congress of Virology6
- Page 252 and 253: 5 th European Congress of VirologyC
- Page 254 and 255: 5 th European Congress of VirologyM
- Page 256 and 257: 5 th European Congress of Virologyi
- Page 258 and 259: 5 th European Congress of Virology2
- Page 260 and 261: 5 th European Congress of Virologyf
- Page 262 and 263: 5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 264 and 265: 5 th European Congress of Virologyw
- Page 266 and 267: 5 th European Congress of VirologyM
- Page 268 and 269: 5 th European Congress of VirologyI
- Page 270 and 271: 5 th European Congress of Virologyp
- Page 272 and 273: 5 th European Congress of Virologyu
- Page 276 and 277: 5 th European Congress of Virologys
- Page 278 and 279: 5 th European Congress of Virology2
- Page 280 and 281: 5 th European Congress of Virologyf
- Page 282 and 283: 5 th European Congress of Virology2
- Page 284 and 285: 5 th European Congress of VirologyA
- Page 286 and 287: 5 th European Congress of VirologyI
- Page 288 and 289: 5 th European Congress of VirologyB
- Page 290 and 291: 5 th European Congress of VirologyD
- Page 292 and 293: 5 th European Congress of VirologyG
- Page 294 and 295: 5 th European Congress of VirologyJ
- Page 296 and 297: 5 th European Congress of VirologyL
- Page 298 and 299: 5 th European Congress of VirologyN
- Page 300 and 301: 5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 302 and 303: 5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 304 and 305: 5 th European Congress of VirologyW