5 th <strong>European</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Virology</strong>Wednesday 11 th September 2013,16h15 – 18h15WORKSHOP 8: “ANTIVIRAL THERAPY ANDRESISTANCE TO ACUTE VIRAL INFECTION”Chairpersons: Johan NEYTS (Leuven, BELGIUM)& Manuel ROSA-CALATRAVA (Lyon, FRANCE)Amphitheatermembrane spanning protein <strong>of</strong> the viral replication complex corroboratethat K22 interferes with membrane bound viral RNA synthesis. This novelapproach is also applicable to diverse animal and human CoVs, includingthe recently identified HCoV EMC, and efficient inhibition can be achievedat the entry port <strong>of</strong> human CoV infection, the human airway epithelium.Collectively, we identified the recruitment <strong>of</strong> cellular membranes for viralreplication as a promising target for antiviral intervention. As replication atcellular membranes is a key step in the life cycle <strong>of</strong> many positive strandedRNA viruses, this approach may serve as a paradigm for the development<strong>of</strong> antiviral drugs to combat many other important virus infections.KEYNOTE:Antiviral Therapy and Resistance during acute viral infectionCharles BOUCHERDepartment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Virology</strong> Erasmus Medical Centre, Erasmus UniversityRotterdam, THE NETHERLANDSThe viral inoculum required for a successful viral infection is generallyquite small. Very early in HIV infection a nearly homogeneous viral wildtype population is found. The absence <strong>of</strong> viral variation enhances the efficacy<strong>of</strong> therapy because selection <strong>of</strong> preexisting resistance viruses is verylow. For example treatment with a low genetic drug (oseltamivir) veryrarely results in selection <strong>of</strong> single mutant resistant influenza. Under certainconditions selection <strong>of</strong> drug resistant may occur, for Influenza, HCV orHIV viruses the initial selected resistant viruses have a reduced replicativepotential. Continuous selection can lead to multiple additional compensatorymutations resulting in resistant viruses with a compensated replicationpotential. As a result <strong>of</strong> large scale spread use <strong>of</strong> antiviral drugs such compensatedresistant viruses can be transmitted and start sub epidemics (asreported for HIV) or can be the start <strong>of</strong> a global epidemic <strong>of</strong> resistance asobserved for Influenza in 2008. We study the rate <strong>of</strong> transmission <strong>of</strong> HIVand Influenza and subsequent evolution and its clinical significance.ORAL COMMUNICATIONSREF O07Potent inhibition <strong>of</strong> diverse Coronaviruses by targeting membranebound viral RNA synthesisEveline KINDLER 1 , A. LUNDIN 2 , R. DIJKMAN 1 , T. BERGSTROM 2 ,N. KANN 3 , B. ADMIAK 2 , C. HANNOUN 1 , H.R. JÓNSDÓTTIR 1 ,D. MUTH 4 , M.A. MÜLLER 4 , C. DROSTEN 4 , V. THIEL 1 ,E. TRYBALA 21 Institute <strong>of</strong> Immunobiology,Kantonal Hospital, St.Gallen, SWITZER-LAND; 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Clinical <strong>Virology</strong>, University <strong>of</strong> Gothenborg,Gothenborg, SWEDEN; 3 Chalmers University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Gothenborg,SWEDEN; 4 Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Virology</strong>, University <strong>of</strong> Bonn, Bonn,GERMANYThe concept <strong>of</strong> targeting key functions <strong>of</strong> the viral replication cycle ledto the development <strong>of</strong> potent antiviral drugs against HIV, influenza, andrecently HCV. Although targeting <strong>of</strong> multiple viral functions or enzymaticactivities resulted in highly active antiviral therapies, virus resistanceremains a concern. Therefore, there is an need to identify novel and druggabletargets to improve antiviral therapy. By screening more than 16 ′ 000compounds for anti human coronavirus 229E activity, we identified apotent inhibitor designated K22 that specifically targets membrane boundcoronavirus (CoV) RNA synthesis. Formation <strong>of</strong> virus induced doublemembrane vesicles, a hallmark <strong>of</strong> CoV replication, was impaired uponK22 treatment, which manifested a near complete inhibition <strong>of</strong> viral RNAsynthesis. Resistance mutants containing amino acid substitutions in aREF O08Discovery <strong>of</strong> low molecular weight compounds inhibiting Chikungunyavirus RNA replicationTero AHOLA 1 , Pasi KAUKINEN 1 , Finny VARGHESE 1 , MaximBESPALOV 2 , Krister WENNERBERG 2 , Andres MERITS 3 , BeateKUMMERER 41 University <strong>of</strong> Helsinki, Helsinki, FINLAND; 2 Institute for MolecularMedicine Finland, Helsinki, FINLAND; 3 University <strong>of</strong> Tartu, Tartu, ESTO-NIA; 4 University <strong>of</strong> Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, GERMANYChikungunya virus (CHIKV) (genus Alphavirus) causes in humans highfever, body rash, headache and severe joint pain that can persist for monthsor years. The re emergence <strong>of</strong> CHIKV caused a large epidemic on LaRéunion Island in 2005 2006 and the virus subsequently spread to Indiaand South East Asia causing millions <strong>of</strong> infections. Endemic CHIKV infectionshave also been reported in Italy and France. CHIKV is transmitted inhumans by the bite <strong>of</strong> infected yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti) orAsian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus). Currently, there is no vaccine orspecific drugs available to treat CHIKV infection. In this study, a CHIKVreplicon cell line expressing the virus replicase proteins and replicatingviral RNA was used in an antiviral screening assay with approximately3000 compounds. We identified several low molecular weight compoundsthat target the intracellular step <strong>of</strong> CHIKV replication. The most activecompounds were validated in CHIKV infection assay in human Huh7cells in combination with toxicity counter screening. We identified six hitcompounds, which showed dose dependent inhibition <strong>of</strong> CHIKV and therelated Semliki Forest virus with half maximal inhibitory concentration(IC50) below 3 micro Molar. As some <strong>of</strong> the compounds strongly modifiedthe localization <strong>of</strong> viral membrane bound replication complexes inCHIKV infected cells, they may affect general membrane properties. Therefore,some <strong>of</strong> the inhibitors could have broad spectrum antiviral activity.Isolation and analysis <strong>of</strong> drug resistant mutant viruses is currently beingpursued.REF O09Humanized antibodies able to protect mice from tick borne encephalitisNina TIKUNOVA 1 , Andrey MATVEEV 1 ,IvanBAIKOV 1 , LeonidMATVEEV 1 , Oleg STRONIN 21 Institute <strong>of</strong> Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk,RUSSIA; 2 Federal State Unitary Company Microgen Scientific IndustrialCompany for Immunobiological Medicines, Tomsk, RUSSIAAntibodies are used for therapy for a long time due to their exceptionalproperties – high specificities, availability <strong>of</strong> effector functions, andinvolvement <strong>of</strong> natural mechanisms in pharmacokinetics <strong>of</strong> administratedantibodies. There is currently no specific therapeutic strategy approved foruse in human tick borne encephalitis (TBE) in Europe. Specific immunoglobulinproduced from donor blood is used for TBE treatment in Russiabut this preparation has some disadvantages. Recombinant therapeuticantibodies <strong>of</strong>fer an obvious alternative to donor’s immunoglobulin.Vi<strong>rologie</strong>, Vol 17, supplément 2, septembre 2013S41
5 th <strong>European</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Virology</strong>Several neutralizing mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific to glycoproteinE <strong>of</strong> TBE virus were tested in the model animal protectionexperiments using lethal doses <strong>of</strong> this virus. Mouse MAb demonstratedprotective activity in the absence <strong>of</strong> antibody dependent enhancementwas selected. Variable domains <strong>of</strong> this mouse Mab and constant domains<strong>of</strong> human immunoglobulin were used to construct humanized antibody.This humanized antibody produced by CHO cell line shown nanomolaraffinity and ability to neutralize TBE infectivity in vitro. Moreover, thisantibody demonstrated protective activity when administrated 123daysbefore infection and therapeutic activity when administrated 1 2 days postinfection in TBE virus infected mice, and this activity was higher thantherapeutic activity <strong>of</strong> commercially available specific immunoglobulinfrom donor blood.REF O10Characterization <strong>of</strong> human cytomegalovirus microRNA temporalexpression pr<strong>of</strong>ile and target prediction by dynamic expression analysisMarta TREVISAN 1 , Carlotta ALBONETTI 1 , Enrico LAVEZZO 1 ,Tiziana SANAVIA 2 , Alessandro SINIGAGLIA 1,3 , Barbara DICAMILLO 2 , Giorgio PALÙ 1 , Luisa BARZON 11 Department <strong>of</strong> Molecular Medicine, University <strong>of</strong> Padova, Padova,ITALY; 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Information Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Padova,Padova, ITALY; 3 IOV Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, ITALYTargets for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) miRNAs in host transcriptomeare still largely unknown. Aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to characterize theeffects <strong>of</strong> HCMV miRNAs on host human miRNA and mRNA temporalexpression pr<strong>of</strong>iles after infection, identifying candidate gene targets.To this aim, tandem microarray analysis <strong>of</strong> miRNA and mRNA temporalexpression was done in time series <strong>of</strong> MRC 5 cells infected with HCMVTowne strain. The majority <strong>of</strong> HCMV miRNAs was found to be expressedsince the earliest stages or within 24 hours post infection and continuedto accumulate over time. Differentially expressed mRNAs were selectedaccording to the area <strong>of</strong> the region bounded by the expression pr<strong>of</strong>ilesrelated to control and post infection cases. Identification <strong>of</strong> HCMV miR-NAs targets was done by integrating the prediction <strong>of</strong> sequence basedalgorithms with Pearson correlation between viral miRNAs and cellularmRNAs temporal pr<strong>of</strong>ile to detect significant negatively correlated targetgenes. This method, for instance, permitted to identify 55 significantlycorrelated target for HCMV miR US25 2 5p among the 1034 sequencebased selected candidate genes. Experimental validation <strong>of</strong> some selectedpredicted targets was done by standard lucyferase activity assays and westernblot analysis. In conclusion, an integrated analysis <strong>of</strong> viral miRNAsand host mRNA using a meta consensus approach based both on sequenceprediction methods and on correlation analysis <strong>of</strong> dynamic expressiondata allowed the prediction and identification <strong>of</strong> host targets for HCMVmiRNAs.REF O11Non liposomal delivery <strong>of</strong> anti rabies virus siRNAs counteracts viralgrowth and spread in vitroTobias HALBACH, Johannes HARDER, Konstantin SPARRER,Thomas CARELL, Karl Klaus CONZELMANNLMU, Munich, GERMANYRabies virus (RABV) infection continues to be a threat throughout theworld, with more than 55,000 human deaths each year. The majority <strong>of</strong>rabies cases occur in rural regions <strong>of</strong> Africa and South Asia, where RABVinfection is endemic and access to rapid medical treatment is hindered.After the first symptoms <strong>of</strong> rabies emerge, post exposure treatment andvaccinations are not potent anymore and the outcome <strong>of</strong> the disease isalmost exclusively fatal. Therefore, the need for an efficient antiviral therapyagainst rabies is still a major issue. RNA interference (RNAi), whichsilences expression <strong>of</strong> specific target genes could represent a promisingtool for treating RABV infections in mammalian hosts. However, difficultiesincluding delivery <strong>of</strong> siRNA/miRNA, short term efficiency, theemergence <strong>of</strong> resistant subpopulations and the resistance <strong>of</strong> viral RNPsagainst RNAi limit the potential <strong>of</strong> this method. Here, we developed anovel non liposomal siRNA delivery system that can counteract RABVgrowth and spread in vitro. Using siRNAs that were covalently linked toan arachidonoyl ethanol amide (anandamide) ligand via their 3‘end wecould specifically target cells expressing the receptor for the anandamideligand (the cannabinoid receptor), which is predominantly present on neuronaland immune cells. Indeed, RABV infected human immune cells andmouse neuronal cells that were treated with the anandamide modified siR-NAs showed a strong inhibitory effect against RABV infection. Adaptingthis system to an in vivo model, it might represent a promising tool to limitRABV infections in vivo.REF O12Inhibition <strong>of</strong> Pyridimine Biosynthesis Pathway Suppresses ViralGrowth Through Innate ImmunityPierre Olivier VIDALAIN 1,2 , Marianne LUCAS HOURANI 1,2 , DanielDAUZONNE 3,4 , Pierre JORDA 3,4 , Gaëlle COUSIN 3,4 , AlexandruLUPAN 5,6 , Olivier HELYNCK 5,6 , Grégory CAIGNARD 1,2 , GenevièveJANVIER 1,2 , Gwénaëlle ANDRÉ 7,8 , Nicolas ESCRIOU 1,2 , PhilippeDESPRÈS 9 ,YvesJACOB 10,11 , Hélène MUNIER LEHMANN 5,6 ,Frédéric TANGY 1,21 Unité Génomique Virale et Vaccination, Institut Pasteur, Paris, FRANCE;2 CNRS, UMR 3569, Paris, FRANCE; 3 Institut Curie, Paris, FRANCE;4 CNRS, UMR 176, Paris, FRANCE; 5 Unité de Chimie et Biocatalyse,Institut Pasteur, Paris, FRANCE; 6 CNRS, UMR 3523, Paris, FRANCE;7 Unité de Biochimie Structurale, Institut Pasteur, Paris, FRANCE; 8 CNRS,URA 2185, Paris, FRANCE; 9 Unité Interactions moléculaires FlavivirusHôtes, Institut Pasteur, Paris, FRANCE; 10 Unité de Génétique Moléculairedes Virus à ARN, Institut Pasteur, Paris, FRANCE; 11 Dana Farber CancerInstitute, Center for Cancer Systems Biology (CCSB) and Department <strong>of</strong>Cancer Biology, Boston, USASearching for stimulators <strong>of</strong> the innate antiviral response is an appealingapproach to develop novel therapeutics against viral infections. Here weestablished a cell based reporter assay to identify compounds stimulatingexpression <strong>of</strong> interferon inducible antiviral genes. We screened a total <strong>of</strong>41,353 small molecules and selected DD264 for its immuno stimulatoryand antiviral properties. While searching for its mode <strong>of</strong> action, we identifiedDD264 as an inhibitor <strong>of</strong> pyrimidine biosynthesis, establishing ayet unsuspected link between this pathway and the expression <strong>of</strong> antiviralgenes. Furthermore, we found that antiviral activity <strong>of</strong> DD264 orbrequinar, a well known inhibitor <strong>of</strong> pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway, isstrictly dependent on cellular gene transcription and required InterferonRegulatory Factor 1 (IRF1). Altogether, our results better explain the antiviralproperty <strong>of</strong> pyrimidine biosynthesis inhibitors and unravel a novelpathway that induces cell resistance to RNA virus infections.S42 Vi<strong>rologie</strong>, Vol 17, supplément 2, septembre 2013
- Page 3 and 4: Contents5 th European Congress of V
- Page 5 and 6: i r o l o g i eList of Keynote Spea
- Page 7 and 8: i r o l o g i eList of Chairpersons
- Page 9 and 10: i r o l o g i eWelcomeWelcome to th
- Page 11 and 12: 5 th European Congress of VirologyY
- Page 13 and 14: i r o l o g i eExhibitorsThe indust
- Page 15: i r o l o g i eFacilities for the 5
- Page 18 and 19: i r o l o g i eGeneral Information
- Page 20 and 21: PROGRAMME AT A GLANCEWednesday 11th
- Page 22 and 23: 5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 24 and 25: 5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 26 and 27: 5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 28 and 29: 5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 30 and 31: 5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 32 and 33: Scientific Programme -Saturday 14 t
- Page 34 and 35: 5 th European Congress of Virology1
- Page 36 and 37: 5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 38 and 39: 5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 40 and 41: 5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 44 and 45: 5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 46 and 47: 5 th European Congress of VirologyW
- Page 48 and 49: 5 th European Congress of VirologyT
- Page 50 and 51: 5 th European Congress of VirologyT
- Page 52 and 53: 5 th European Congress of VirologyT
- Page 54 and 55: 5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 56 and 57: 5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 58 and 59: 5 th European Congress of Virologyw
- Page 60 and 61: 5 th European Congress of VirologyT
- Page 62 and 63: 5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 64 and 65: 5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 66 and 67: 5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 68 and 69: 5 th European Congress of VirologyT
- Page 70 and 71: 5 th European Congress of VirologyA
- Page 72 and 73: 5 th European Congress of Virologyp
- Page 74 and 75: 5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 76 and 77: 5 th European Congress of VirologyF
- Page 78 and 79: 5 th European Congress of VirologyF
- Page 80 and 81: 5 th European Congress of Virologyc
- Page 82 and 83: 5 th European Congress of VirologyF
- Page 84 and 85: 5 th European Congress of VirologyF
- Page 86 and 87: 5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 88 and 89: 5 th European Congress of VirologyH
- Page 90 and 91: 5 th European Congress of VirologyF
- Page 92 and 93:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 94 and 95:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 96 and 97:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 98 and 99:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 100 and 101:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 102 and 103:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 104 and 105:
5 th European Congress of VirologyA
- Page 106 and 107:
5 th European Congress of Virology1
- Page 108 and 109:
5 th European Congress of Virology1
- Page 110 and 111:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 112 and 113:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 114 and 115:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 116 and 117:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 118 and 119:
Virologie 2013, 17 (supplément 2)
- Page 120 and 121:
5 th European Congress of VirologyA
- Page 122 and 123:
5 th European Congress of Virology0
- Page 124 and 125:
5 th European Congress of Virology0
- Page 126 and 127:
5 th European Congress of VirologyH
- Page 128 and 129:
5 th European Congress of Virologys
- Page 130 and 131:
5 th European Congress of Virology0
- Page 132 and 133:
5 th European Congress of Virologyf
- Page 134 and 135:
5 th European Congress of VirologyE
- Page 136 and 137:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 138 and 139:
5 th European Congress of VirologyA
- Page 140 and 141:
5 th European Congress of Virologyp
- Page 142 and 143:
5 th European Congress of Virology0
- Page 144 and 145:
5 th European Congress of Virologyi
- Page 146 and 147:
5 th European Congress of Virologyr
- Page 148 and 149:
5 th European Congress of Virologyi
- Page 150 and 151:
5 th European Congress of Virologyp
- Page 152 and 153:
5 th European Congress of Virology3
- Page 154 and 155:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 156 and 157:
5 th European Congress of Virology0
- Page 158 and 159:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 160 and 161:
5 th European Congress of VirologyB
- Page 162 and 163:
5 th European Congress of Virologyr
- Page 164 and 165:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 166 and 167:
5 th European Congress of Virologyi
- Page 168 and 169:
5 th European Congress of VirologyI
- Page 170 and 171:
5 th European Congress of Virologyf
- Page 172 and 173:
5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 174 and 175:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 176 and 177:
5 th European Congress of Virology1
- Page 178 and 179:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 180 and 181:
5 th European Congress of VirologyV
- Page 182 and 183:
5 th European Congress of Virologyc
- Page 184 and 185:
5 th European Congress of Virologyw
- Page 186 and 187:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 188 and 189:
5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 190 and 191:
5 th European Congress of VirologyA
- Page 192 and 193:
5 th European Congress of Virologyn
- Page 194 and 195:
5 th European Congress of Virologyi
- Page 196 and 197:
5 th European Congress of Virologyw
- Page 198 and 199:
5 th European Congress of VirologyT
- Page 200 and 201:
5 th European Congress of Virology(
- Page 202 and 203:
5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 204 and 205:
5 th European Congress of Virology1
- Page 206 and 207:
5 th European Congress of Virologyo
- Page 208 and 209:
5 th European Congress of VirologyI
- Page 210 and 211:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 212 and 213:
5 th European Congress of Virologyw
- Page 214 and 215:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 216 and 217:
5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 218 and 219:
5 th European Congress of Virologyp
- Page 220 and 221:
5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 222 and 223:
5 th European Congress of Virology(
- Page 224 and 225:
5 th European Congress of Virologyt
- Page 226 and 227:
5 th European Congress of Virologyn
- Page 228 and 229:
5 th European Congress of Virologyi
- Page 230 and 231:
5 th European Congress of Virologyo
- Page 232 and 233:
5 th European Congress of Virology2
- Page 234 and 235:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 236 and 237:
5 th European Congress of Virology7
- Page 238 and 239:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 240 and 241:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 242 and 243:
5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 244 and 245:
5 th European Congress of Virologyc
- Page 246 and 247:
5 th European Congress of Virologya
- Page 248 and 249:
5 th European Congress of Virologyh
- Page 250 and 251:
5 th European Congress of Virology6
- Page 252 and 253:
5 th European Congress of VirologyC
- Page 254 and 255:
5 th European Congress of VirologyM
- Page 256 and 257:
5 th European Congress of Virologyi
- Page 258 and 259:
5 th European Congress of Virology2
- Page 260 and 261:
5 th European Congress of Virologyf
- Page 262 and 263:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 264 and 265:
5 th European Congress of Virologyw
- Page 266 and 267:
5 th European Congress of VirologyM
- Page 268 and 269:
5 th European Congress of VirologyI
- Page 270 and 271:
5 th European Congress of Virologyp
- Page 272 and 273:
5 th European Congress of Virologyu
- Page 274 and 275:
5 th European Congress of VirologyO
- Page 276 and 277:
5 th European Congress of Virologys
- Page 278 and 279:
5 th European Congress of Virology2
- Page 280 and 281:
5 th European Congress of Virologyf
- Page 282 and 283:
5 th European Congress of Virology2
- Page 284 and 285:
5 th European Congress of VirologyA
- Page 286 and 287:
5 th European Congress of VirologyI
- Page 288 and 289:
5 th European Congress of VirologyB
- Page 290 and 291:
5 th European Congress of VirologyD
- Page 292 and 293:
5 th European Congress of VirologyG
- Page 294 and 295:
5 th European Congress of VirologyJ
- Page 296 and 297:
5 th European Congress of VirologyL
- Page 298 and 299:
5 th European Congress of VirologyN
- Page 300 and 301:
5 th European Congress of VirologyR
- Page 302 and 303:
5 th European Congress of VirologyS
- Page 304 and 305:
5 th European Congress of VirologyW