Evaluating User Experience in Games: Concepts and Methods - Lirmm

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 10 Evaluating User Experience Factors Using Experiments: Expressive Artificial Faces Embedded in Contexts Michael Lankes, Regina Bernhaupt, and Manfred Tscheligi Abstract There is an ongoing debate on what kind of factors contribute to the general positive user experience while playing a game. The following chapter introduces an experimental setting to measure user experience aroused by facial expression of embodied conversational agents (ECAs). The experimental setup enables to measure the implications of ECAs in three contextual settings called “still,” “animated,” and “interaction.” Within the experiment, artificially generated facial expressions are combined with emotion-eliciting situations and are presented via different presentation platforms. Stimuli (facial expressions/emotion-eliciting situations) are assembled in either consonant (for example, facial expression: “joy,” emotion-eliciting situation: “joy”) or dissonant (for example, facial expression: “joy,” emotion-eliciting situation: “anger”) constellations. The contextual setting called “interaction” is derived from the video games domain, granting an interactive experience of a given emotional situation. The aim of the study is to establish a comparative experimental framework to analyze subjects’ user experience on emotional stimuli in different context dimensions. This comparative experimental framework utilizes theoretical models of emotion theory along with approaches from human– computer interaction to close a gap in the intersection of affective computing and research on facial expressions. Results showed that the interaction situation is rated as providing a better user experience, independent of showing consonant or dissonant contextual descriptions. The “still” setting is given a higher user experience rating than the “animated” setting. 10.1 Introduction Various methods and new methodological developments have been proposed to evaluate user experience in application domains ranging from user experience evaluation of mobile phones (Roto and Rautava 2008) to user experience for interactive M. Lankes (B) Upper Austria University of Applied Sciences, Hagenberg, Austria e-mail: michael.lankes@fh-hagenberg.at R. Bernhaupt (ed.), Evaluating User Experience in Games, Human-Computer Interaction Series, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84882-963-3_10, C○ Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010 165
Page 2 and 3:
Human-Computer Interaction Series E
Page 4 and 5:
Regina Bernhaupt Editor Evaluating
Page 6:
For Philippe
Page 9 and 10:
viii Foreword Chapter 3, Presence I
Page 11 and 12:
x Foreword personality which evolve
Page 14 and 15:
Contents Part I Introduction to Eva
Page 16 and 17:
Contributors Regina Bernhaupt IRIT,
Page 18:
Contributors xvii Manfred Tscheligi
Page 21 and 22:
xx About the Authors Emily Brown is
Page 23 and 24:
xxii About the Authors a post-docto
Page 25 and 26:
xxiv About the Authors Christina Ko
Page 27 and 28:
xxvi About the Authors MIT Media La
Page 29:
xxviii About the Authors Theft Auto
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 1 User Experience Evaluatio
Page 35 and 36:
1 User Experience Evaluation in Ent
Page 37:
1 User Experience Evaluation in Ent
Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 2 Enabling Social Play: A F
Page 43 and 44:
2 Enabling Social Play 13 It is als
Page 45 and 46:
2 Enabling Social Play 15 observati
Page 47 and 48:
2 Enabling Social Play 17 for playe
Page 49 and 50:
2 Enabling Social Play 19 to provid
Page 51 and 52:
2 Enabling Social Play 21 Colwell J
Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 3 Presence, Involvement, an
Page 55 and 56:
3 Presence, Involvement, and Flow i
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 4 Assessing the Core Elemen
Page 79 and 80:
4 Assessing the Core Elements of th
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101:
Page 104 and 105:
74 E. Brown (2005). Björk and Holo
Page 106 and 107:
76 E. Brown 5.2.3 How We Work Toget
Page 108 and 109:
78 E. Brown could be simulated on p
Page 110 and 111:
80 E. Brown 5.3.2 Pre-production At
Page 112 and 113:
82 E. Brown from the code. This is
Page 114 and 115:
84 E. Brown At this point, there is
Page 116 and 117:
86 E. Brown Game developers have be
Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 6 Investigating Experiences
Page 121 and 122:
6 Investigating Experiences and Att
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135:
Page 138 and 139:
108 G. McAllister and G.R. White Th
Page 140 and 141:
110 G. McAllister and G.R. White su
Page 142 and 143:
112 G. McAllister and G.R. White of
Page 144 and 145: 114 G. McAllister and G.R. White te
Page 146 and 147: 116 G. McAllister and G.R. White qu
Page 150 and 151: 120 G. McAllister and G.R. White 7.
Page 154 and 155: 124 G. McAllister and G.R. White an
Page 156 and 157: 126 G. McAllister and G.R. White Al
Page 158 and 159: 128 G. McAllister and G.R. White Ne
Page 161 and 162: Chapter 8 User Experience Design fo
Page 163 and 164: 8 User Experience Design for Inexpe
Page 177: 8 User Experience Design for Inexpe
Page 180 and 181: 150 K. Poels et al. in games. This
Page 182 and 183: 152 K. Poels et al. their game char
Page 184 and 185: 154 K. Poels et al. If we apply thi
Page 186 and 187: 156 K. Poels et al. Participants ge
Page 188 and 189: 158 K. Poels et al. 9.3.2 Exploring
Page 190 and 191: 160 K. Poels et al. If our train is
Page 192 and 193: 162 K. Poels et al. would be intere
Page 196 and 197: 166 M. Lankes et al. TV (Bernhaupt
Page 198 and 199: 168 M. Lankes et al. Concerning the
Page 200 and 201: 170 M. Lankes et al. Darwin (Cornel
Page 202 and 203: 172 M. Lankes et al. emotion-elicit
Page 204 and 205: 174 M. Lankes et al. Stimuli Descri
Page 206 and 207: 176 M. Lankes et al. categories. Th
Page 208 and 209: 178 M. Lankes et al. of three diffe
Page 210 and 211: 180 M. Lankes et al. Comparing stil
Page 212 and 213: 182 M. Lankes et al. Crane EA, Sham
Page 215: Part IV User Experience - Evaluatin
Page 218 and 219: 188 F. Mueller and N. Bianchi-Berth
Page 239 and 240: Chapter 12 Beyond the Gamepad: HCI
Page 241 and 242: 12 Beyond the Gamepad 211 12.2.1 St
Page 243 and 244: 12 Beyond the Gamepad 213 Fig. 12.1
Page 245 and 246:
12 Beyond the Gamepad 215 interacti
Page 247 and 248:
12 Beyond the Gamepad 217 12.4.1 Ju
Page 249 and 250:
12 Beyond the Gamepad 219 12.4.3 Re
Page 251 and 252:
12 Beyond the Gamepad 221 Time and
Page 253 and 254:
12 Beyond the Gamepad 223 Table 12.
Page 255 and 256:
12 Beyond the Gamepad 225 “Very e
Page 257 and 258:
12 Beyond the Gamepad 227 This exam
Page 259 and 260:
12 Beyond the Gamepad 229 This user
Page 261:
12 Beyond the Gamepad 231 Pinelle D
Page 264 and 265:
234 C. Koeffel et al. 2005). Severa
Page 266 and 267:
236 C. Koeffel et al. of a higher q
Page 268 and 269:
238 C. Koeffel et al. (see followin
Page 270 and 271:
240 C. Koeffel et al. are character
Page 272 and 273:
242 C. Koeffel et al. tabletop game
Page 274 and 275:
244 C. Koeffel et al. Virtual Inter
Page 276 and 277:
246 C. Koeffel et al. their selecti
Page 278 and 279:
248 C. Koeffel et al. we have selec
Page 280 and 281:
250 C. Koeffel et al. calculating a
Page 282 and 283:
252 C. Koeffel et al. Our approach
Page 284 and 285:
254 C. Koeffel et al. Cognitive Erg
Page 286 and 287:
256 C. Koeffel et al. Nielsen J, Mo
Page 288:
258 Index motivation, 150-155 perce
show all

Evaluating User Experience in Games: Concepts and Methods - Lirmm

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?